Ray @Stabiae331

@PCosmologist Ah yes, nothing says 'I just overturned a century of foundational cosmology' quite like a 'Peer Rewieved' paper in SCIRP, a well-known predatory publisher. Let me know when this hits The Astrophysical Journal—until then, I think standard physics is sleeping just fine.

1 0 1 16 0

View Details

Ray @Stabiae331

3 weeks ago

@ireneboss Stunning

0 0 1 10 0

View Details

Ray @Stabiae331

4 weeks ago

1 Augustus 2 Julius Caesar 3 Trajan 4 Justinian I 5 Diocletian 6 Aurelian 7 Basil II 8 Vespasian 9 Alexios I Komnenos 10 Majorian Honorable mention—Septimius Severus Excluded Constantine 1 because establishing Constantinople shifted the empire’s center of power and he thought himself a second Romulus. Marcus Aurelius because his decision to make Commodus his successor Hadrian** because he made consolidation, rather than expansion, the guiding policy of the Empire….it is when the rot began

1 0 1 88 0

View Details

Ray @Stabiae331

3 months ago

@ireneboss Stunningly beautiful and meant to be adored!!!!!

0 0 2 22 0

View Details

Ray @Stabiae331

3 months ago

@ireneboss It is my privilege……you have beautiful… and knowing and understanding eyes

0 0 1 8 0

View Details

Ray @Stabiae331

5 months ago

Check out my latest article: PART 2 of 2: The CYBERCAB IN THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT linkedin.com/pulse/part-2-c… via @LinkedIn

0 0 0 61 0

View Details

Ray @Stabiae331

5 months ago

Check out my latest article: Part 1 of 2: AI AND THE LAW, FROM CRUISE CONTROL TO CYBERCAB linkedin.com/pulse/part-1-2… via @LinkedIn

0 0 1 32 0

View Details

Ray @Stabiae331

6 months ago

@Oliviaxrtx No you’re beautiful

0 0 0 3 0

View Details

Ray @Stabiae331

8 months ago

@vxylily Just 10….100 at least…..

0 0 0 10 0

View Details

Ray @Stabiae331

8 months ago

@LilSpanky Sex

0 0 0 11 0

View Details

Ray @Stabiae331

8 months ago

@Neccccy Machiavellian

0 0 1 366 0

View Details

Ray @Stabiae331

8 months ago

@EmilySm43 Her’s do

0 0 0 8 0

View Details

Ray @Stabiae331

8 months ago

@lady_valor_07 Elon Musk

4 0 4 312 0

View Details

Ray @Stabiae331

8 months ago

@Matt_Pinner Love it

0 0 0 5 0

View Details

Ray @Stabiae331

8 months ago

@teslacarsonly Love it

0 0 2 46 0

View Details

Ray @Stabiae331

8 months ago

To ensure that we meet the goal of returning to the moon by the end of this decade, should SpaceX sacrifice the reusability of starship? This would lower the weight and simplify or eliminate the need for refueling. Also, is it time to consider using nuclear fuel on starship? That should eliminate the need for refueling and increase the cargo capabilities.