Tim Pohl @TimPohl7

@LibOrNormal Fuckyeah!

@Jennifer55gt Another Goatfucking Scammer!!

@Severin06453458 Dumbfuck Goatfucking scammer! You cannot add numbers? Dumbfuck

@Sofia50020Sofia Fake meat!

@travelingflying You would blasted back out of my window! I lock my doors for your protection, not mine!

@The_FJC Money back to we the people, doesn't treason carry the death penalty?

@Lilly_330n Death, human DNA

@Jenny1708FL They should be put down like a dog! But a dog doesn't know any better!

@lady_valor_07 Hide the money, because I know its not mine!

@miracles7k Satan!

@DonHenzzy_ Good for you! Not all people are financially stable enough to do what you are doing! You just put a thorn in their child trafficking! 👍

Corrupt CPS officer gets exposed for her lying and deception by the guy. Watch her ego crumble in real time. Lawsuit currently in progress. Warrantless raids, manufactured emergencies, and weaponized state power: this is what happens when Child Protective Services operates completely unchecked under color of law. ​What you are watching on this doorbell camera is not routine child welfare—l, it is a calculated retaliatory maneuver by Loudoun County Child Protective Services (CPS) and local sheriff’s deputies after a citizen refused to surrender his constitutional rights. ​The homeowner, Farzin Yazdani, found himself targeted by an escalating series of malicious, bad-faith reports stemming from a contentious custody feud. The reporting party had already filed fabricated assault accusations against him that local prosecutors ultimately dropped (nolle prossed). But when direct criminal allegations failed, social services was brought in as a proxy weapon to target his children, including his one-month-old breastfeeding infant, Roxana. ​When caseworkers first descended on his residence flanked by armed deputies, they possessed no search warrant, no court order, and no legal authority to breach the threshold. Yazdani stood firm behind his door, invoking his Fourth Amendment right against warrantless government searches. In response, CPS engaged in blatant bad-faith tactics: ​ Rather than respecting clear constitutional boundaries, the agency documented a citizen's lawful refusal of warrantless entry as hostile "non-compliance" and an "imminent threat," using his exercise of rights as a pretext to manufacture an emergency. Within 30 minutes of the initial standoff, Yazdani reached out and offered to let the caseworker visually inspect the infant that very evening, provided she arrived without armed law enforcement. CPS and county officials rejected the offer, went before a magistrate the very next day, and falsely attested under oath that "no less-drastic alternative existed" to physically seizing the children. The caseworker showed up with an emergency removal order obtained with zero prior notice, deliberately emailing the legal filings to Yazdani's work address just three minutes before knocking on his door, blatantly dodging his civil rights attorney who was actively calling her cell phone on the doorstep. In their rush to execute the order, authorities forcibly seized a one-month-old nursing baby girl from her mother, Emily, a parent against whom the state had never leveled a single accusation of abuse or neglect. ​The state’s manufactured narrative completely collapsed the moment it faced actual judicial scrutiny. Following an exhaustive five-day contested evidentiary hearing, a family court judge dismantled the agency's claims, threw out the emergency removal orders, and ruled that the statutory threshold for state intervention had never been met. Baby Roxana was ordered returned home after eight days in state custody. ​The battle, however, is far from over. Rather than letting the misconduct stay hidden behind closed doors, Yazdani has escalated the fight to federal court, filing a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights lawsuit against the involved Loudoun County deputies and caseworkers for unconstitutional seizure, due process violations, and abuse of state power. This lawsuit is in progress and we will update once there is a conclusion.

Giggling Gannon @GigglingGanon

a week ago

If you ever wondered why they are called trailers. Movie trailers were originally shown at the very end of films, which is why they are called "trailers". In the 1910s, promotional previews for upcoming serial chapters and feature films were spliced at the conclusion of the

9 37 164 1.1M 76

@oelma__ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Barack Obama did ALL he could today to muddy the waters on the investigation into Ilhan Omar. Watch as I fact check his misrepresentations. Don't fall for the Okey Doke.

@omoelerinjare1 True NPC!

Utterly Triggered Workers Melt Down Completely Over a Camera on Tape!

@SharronMcKenna5 They always think that they are above the law, They don't like to be told that their job is to protect and severe and they work for me!! 😁 Fucking Assholes!!

So much disrespect shown to an Officer of the Law. It's disgusting. Makes me so freaking angry. 🤬

It’s a very unpopular view, but this is exactly what the founding fathers had in mind when they wrote the 2nd Amendment. This is tyranny.

A RIDE DOESN’T BUY YOU THE RIGHT TO THREATEN THE DRIVER. According to this post, a disagreement escalated into threats of harm or carjacking. How does someone trying to earn a living suddenly become a target? What gets me is that the car is also the driver’s livelihood. You’re threatening his safety and the thing he depends on to pay his bills. Meanwhile, he’s stuck wondering whether the person sitting behind him means what he says. Paying for a ride entitles you to transportation. It doesn’t entitle you to intimidate the person taking you there.