calvin tull @TullCalvin

I’ve calculated £2.6 billion spent on just 66 charities (bearing in mind there are over 170,000 on the Charity Commission for England and Wales alone!) Includes: Migrant Help - £194,462,000 (2021–25) Migrant Training Company - £2,112,160 (2021–25) Migrants Organise Ltd - £405,130 (2021–25) charlottecgill.co.uk

🔥This isn’t just about the EU! In the UK the government is changing the rules as well. In 2015, all 193 UN member states agreed the Addis Ababa Action Agenda the financing framework for Agenda 2030. The UN describes this as aligning “all financing flows and policies” with economic, social and environmental priorities. It needs your SAVINGS. So when Ursula von der Leyen talks about putting Europe’s trillions in savings “at the service” of European businesses, while Britain at the same time redesigns savings and pension rules to mobilise private capital, it is a GLOBAL PLAN! and your savings are all part of the financing strategy.

Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸 @Tablesalt13

2 months ago

JUST IN - EU President Ursula von der Leyen says that people's savings accounts are a problem and that she must put this money "to the service of European companies" says her plan to "securitize them" and "supervise them" They're coming for your savings, Europe.

7K 23K 66K 12.9M 12K

Once you realise the entire system is engineered against you - this clip becomes perfectly relatable.

Europe calls biomass "clean" but the reality is brutal. To power its "green transition," the EU is burning millions of tons of wood pellets every year, shipped in from the US and Canada. Europe is cutting down forests halfway around the world, grinding them into pellets and shipping them across the Atlantic to burn in its power stations. Unsurprisingly, the total emissions here are higher than simply burning coal, according to peer-reviewed studies by the EU's own scientific advisors. But countries like the UK, Denmark and the Netherlands do it anyway, because it technically counts as zero carbon emissions. Burning forests and calling it "green" isn't climate policy, it's creative accounting.

It was great to finally have someone admit the truth: climate doomerism is about one world government, ending democracy and impoverishing the world. The idea that we must impoverish humanity to save it is not just absurd, it's a suicide pact. Sovereign nations will never accept it, and people will never vote for it. I don't believe in suicide for token gestures towards not solving a problem you're claiming to solve.

The UK Met Office has again been caught publishing temperatures from weather stations that don't exist. An FOI revealed Lowestoft closed in 2010, yet the Met Office kept issuing official temperatures for it. The office said they were using "well-correlated" neighboring stations, but the FOI revealed that this was a lie. The numbers were actually coming from a model that was inventing data from 'phantom' neighboring stations. When exposed, they quietly deleted years of readings for Lowestoft, as well as a number of other stations, and added a disclaimer saying their data is "for general interest only." FOIs also show over one third of Met Office stations never existed, and that real high-quality sites like Colwood are ignored. Also, more than 80% of the network is low-grade class 4 or 5, by WMO standards giving 2-5C uncertainty. This is the foundation of the UK's climate record – closed stations, imaginary stations and synthetic temperatures. The Met Office isn't credible.

The BBC says it will review its climate coverage, not because it suddenly found integrity, but because it got caught. A leaked letter from a former standards advisor accused executives of ignoring "widespread evidence of skewed reporting." The BBC has skewed the truth for years to push a political agenda. It claimed human CO2 made US heatwaves 35 times more likely. It said wildfires were exploding because of climate change. And it sold Net Zero as an economic miracle while hiding the costs. These are all falsehoods with the data, in many cases, showing the exact opposite. And when challenged, the BBC quietly edited, deleted or buried the evidence. Even the regulator Ofcom ordered entire climate programs be pulled for dishonesty. This isn't journalism, it's propaganda. But the public is cottoning on, and switching off. In the past two years alone, roughly a million UK households have stopped paying the BBC license fee.

Important Shiva overview of the Paris Accord COP24 shows it is about setting up the UN as a supranational new government That Carbon Tax is about financing it. It's even more sinister and shows its corruption pscp.tv/w/1yoKMBMPeNnGQ pscp.tv/w/1yoKMBMPeNnGQ

WHY @realDonaldTrump did the RIGHT thing on pulling out of Paris Accords: pscp.tv/w/bAcd1TFQbUVx…

x.com/boot15_vu/stat…

Britain had the rain. So why the shortage? Just five months after England’s eighth wettest winter, reservoirs fell from 94% full to 75.3%. No major new reservoir in 30+ years. Population up 11.5 million. Nearly one litre in five lost through leaks. This isn’t just about the weather. It’s about failing to build, store and maintain.

Can renewables fully replace denser forms of energy? Geologist Scott Tinker breaks down why energy density matters and how renewables fit into a diversified global energy portfolio, but why they won’t replace energy-dense fuels.

x.com/i/article/2078…

Keir Starmer and Dame Antonia Romeo are at the centre of questions about who really runs Britain. The issue is whether powers over policy delivery, Cabinet management, civil service reform and national security coordination are shifting further into Whitehall.

Most renewable electricity in the world is not wind or solar, it is hydropower. Hydro produces about 14% of global electricity, and more than half of all renewable power. It is reliable, dispatchable, and produces virtually no CO2 - yet many environmental groups oppose new dams. The same contradiction appears with nuclear power. Nuclear produces zero operational CO2, runs 24 hours a day, and uses far less land than wind or solar. If cutting emissions were truly the priority here, the focus would be obvious: Hydropower and nuclear, not endless wind and solar expansion.

After Ancient Apocalypse aired, the critical response from mainstream media and academic archaeology was swift and coordinated. Randall went through ten to twelve independent criticisms of the show - from journalists, from archaeologists, from sources presenting themselves as separate and unaffiliated - and found nothing of substance in any of them. What he found instead was something that struck him as far more significant than the criticism itself. The same phraseology. The same arguments. The same framing, repeated across supposedly independent sources with a consistency that pointed not to genuine independent analysis but to a shared origin. Randall is direct about what that pattern implies. Someone assembled that script and distributed it. The coordination required to produce identical talking points across multiple mainstream outlets and academic voices does not happen organically - it requires organization, intent, and a decision made somewhere by someone with both the motivation and the reach to make it happen. Randall names Graham Hancock as a friend and makes clear this is personal as well as principled. The erasure and rewriting of history he has been documenting throughout his research is not an abstract institutional tendency. It has an author - and Randall states plainly that in the interest of disclosure, he would very much like to know who that is.

A BBC article claims the island of Cartí Sugdupu (Gardi Sugdub) is being abandoned because of rising seas. But that's not what's happening. More than 1,000 people live on an island denser than New York City (without the high rises). Residents are relocating because there is no space, not because the island is drowning. The broader science tells the same story. A large satellite analysis of more than 700 islands across 30 atolls found 88.6% were either stable or increased in size, while only about 11% shrank. Another major study of Tuvalu's 100 islands found 73 islands expanded between 1971 and 2014, which, despite alarmist photo ops by the UN, increased the country's total land area by 2.9%. Coral islands naturally shift, build and reshape themselves. But that reality doesn't fit the narrative.

🚨 This is very important. Today the government will unveil its Land Use Framework. It is based on and aligned with the UN Agenda 2030 sustainable development goals. Goal 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), Goal 13 (Climate Action), Goal 15 (Life on Land) This is not about protecting the countryside. It’s about redefining land itself ! how it is used,what it is worth, and who ultimately decides what you can do with it. Under these frameworks, land is no longer simply owned, it is measured, categorised, and managed against central net zero targets. And once that happens, it can be restricted, steered, used to offset and of course monetise. The language will sound all fluffy and virtuous, but the reality is total control of all land.

"The 6th biggest economy in the world is run by infantile fantasists with no understanding of financial markets.... There's nothing progressive about driving the economy of a cliff"📉⛰️ @LiamHalligan @ #BattleFest 2025 "From steel to railways: can the state revitalise British industry?"👨‍🏭🚆 👇