TurfTruth @TurfTruth

BS on a scale from 1-9. 1=no BS, 5=minimum acceptable BS, 9=pure BS. https://t.co/qAFhSbwjKd 567-393-2029 [email protected] Joined July 2008

Tweets

483
Followers

4K
Following

2K
Likes

0

TurfTruth @TurfTruth

2 years ago

BS=1. #Air2g2 did not affect soil moisture, surface firmness, infiltration rate, or O2 conc. compared to the non-treated control. We asked for evidence 2 years ago. We're still waiting. Meanwhile refuting evidence is piling up. @air2g2 @CampeyTurfCare acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cs…

1 0 12 5K 0

TurfTruth @TurfTruth

3 years ago

These cannot be simultaneously true. gcmonline.com/course/turf/ne… "Sorochan noted that zoysiagrass also can be planted to the edge of the green and will not encroach into neighboring areas, such as bunkers or fairways..." @Sorochan, did you say that? If so, will you elaborate?

Kyle Callahan @callahan_kyle

3 years ago

1 1 47 11K 0

Download Image

0 0 3 6K 0

TurfTruth @TurfTruth

3 years ago

BS=1. If we are going to survive the onslaught of negative press about turfgrass, we need to fund, conduct, and promote more research like this. Thank you Mike Barnes and @erictwatkins for this work! journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/j…

0 1 15 5K 2

TurfTruth @TurfTruth

3 years ago

BS=8. Dunning-Kruger in full effect. Find us a better example and we may use it on Season 2 of @TurfTruth Tuesdays. This would be humorous if it were not so dangerous. #TurfMechanic #Dunning youtube.com/watch?v=OKKCQ8…

2 0 8 5K 1

TurfTruth @TurfTruth

3 years ago

BS=7. Without committing a fallacy, please show us any evidence that those specific products result in: the most efficient & economical system of macros and micros sending roots deep protecting the leaf from disease. Indoctrination is powerful. Proverbs 22:6.

Howard Szczurek @HCMSTurf

3 years ago

1 5 16 20K 0

Download Image

4 0 16 16K 0

TurfTruth @TurfTruth

3 years ago

BS=8. By request. 'Some pHactors Affecting Soil Chemistry on Greens' contains a lot of #BCSR misinformation. When the @USGAGrnSection was notified of the same, they acknowledged their error and issued a retraction. @CarolinasGCSA will you follow suit? digital.carolinasgcsa.org/HTML5/Carolina…

0 0 3 2K 0

TurfTruth @TurfTruth

3 years ago

For those asking, no, we did not make these hats and we don't know how to get one. But we like them!

Daniel Marion Francis @francisdmarion

3 years ago

For those asking, no, we did not make these hats and we don't know how to get one. But we like them!

0 0 2 9K 0

Download Image

1 0 14 9K 0

TurfTruth @TurfTruth

3 years ago

BS=1. The evidence refuting #BCSR continues to pile up. "Crop yield was not affected by soil Ca:Mg ratio for any crop in any year." The sooner we stop buying products from charlatans using #BCSR, the more efficient we will be. acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.10…

2 0 21 8K 1

TurfTruth @TurfTruth

3 years ago

BS=8. By request. Claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. But in this case, we have refuting evidence. journals.ashs.org/horttech/view/… 'It also appears that the effects of ozonated water may become negligible after continuous application...' 🔥💵🔥

SeeGrowS @SeeGrowS1

3 years ago

1 1 24 27K 2

Download Video

7 1 11 13K 0

TurfTruth @TurfTruth

3 years ago

BS=6. No they are not ample. No one is refuting that evidence exists confirming #MLSN results in sufficient nutrients under the conditions of those studies. But, none of those studies provide a scintilla of evidence that #MLSN works on ALL turfgrasses on ALL soils.

Micah Woods @asianturfgrass

3 years ago

2 0 5 9K 0

1 0 1 8K 0

TurfTruth @TurfTruth

3 years ago

BS=1. So are we! But let's not forget that BCSR was refuted decades ago. It only remains in our industry as a result of delusion and/or indoctrination.

Steve Datwyler @ravennasuper

3 years ago

BS=1. So are we! But let's not forget that BCSR was refuted decades ago. It only remains in our industry as a result of delusion and/or indoctrination.

1 0 3 5K 0

0 0 9 5K 0

TurfTruth @TurfTruth

3 years ago

BS=1. Thank you. Claiming #MLSN works on bent greens in Scandanavia is an ordinary claim and the paper you cited is ordinary evidence. Claiming #MLSN works on ALL turfgrasses on ALL soils is an extraordinary claim that requires extraordinary evidence.

Bert Sandell @BertSandell

3 years ago

1 0 11 10K 1

2 0 4 9K 0

TurfTruth @TurfTruth

3 years ago

BS=6. We suppose it depends on what you mean by 'works', but the fact that you continue to make these #MLSN claims without providing an iota of evidence is disappointing. Evidence published in a reputable turfgrass journal is all we ask.

Micah Woods @asianturfgrass

3 years ago

2 0 6 11K 0

3 0 6 15K 1

TurfTruth @TurfTruth

3 years ago

BS=1. Lots of great turfgrass exposure by the @NFL. Well done @NPappas23! youtu.be/f1KasB_ZsbE

1 1 7 4K 1

TurfTruth @TurfTruth

3 years ago

For most nutrients, the majority of turfgrass soil tests are not correctly correlated or calibrated. To that end, turfgrass soil testing is a potemkin village.