Writz Protocol 🔜 Meridian 2026 🇵🇹 @WritzProtocol

Documented as a single-contributor dev ceremony. Those keys do not go to mainnet. docs.writz.xyz/developers/run…

The proofs on testnet come from a dev ceremony. One contributor. That key is not a mainnet key. A real ceremony needs people who do not trust us, and who delete their randomness when the round is over.

Liquidez sin perder el rendimiento de tu BTC

Starmaker by Stellar @StarMaker_LATAM

4 days ago

@TheBAFNetwork ¿Y si pudieras pedir USDC prestado sin vender tu Bitcoin? Conoce a Writz: un protocolo de préstamos respaldados en BTC sobre Stellar, sin bridges, sin wrapping y sin custodios. Tu BTC se queda en Bitcoin. @WritzProtocol ⭐

1 0 1 34 0

Relayer: api.testnet.writz.xyz

Site: writz.xyz App: testnet.writz.xyz Docs: docs.writz.xyz/docs/architect… Code: github.com/WritzProtocol/…

The testnet app is public. What works today is on the site. What does not work yet is also on the site. We will not paper over that.

Do you know what Writz is? Come say hi to us during HackMeridian and Meridian. We love connecting with the community!

BAF @TheBAFNetwork

5 days ago

@StellarOrg @withsenda_ @Fondeal0 What if you could borrow USDC without selling your Bitcoin? Writz is a BTC-backed lending protocol on blockchain with no bridging, wrapping or custodians, so your BTC stays on Bitcoin. Meet the team at HackMeridian 🇵🇹 @WritzProtocol

2 1 4 268 0

Presidente @nayibbukele, le escribimos con una propuesta concreta. Somos Writz Protocol, una startup de cuatro latinoamericanos, de Costa Rica y Colombia, que construye infraestructura financiera para Bitcoin sobre Stellar. El dato que nos trae aquí: El Salvador mantiene una reserva de más de 7,800 BTC, cerca de US$650 millones a precio de hoy. Y el país está invirtiendo en grande: al 14 de agosto, Dos Escuelas por Día sumaba 900 centros escolares intervenidos y US$858 millones invertidos. Writz permite usar bitcoin como garantía sin venderlo: - El BTC nunca sale de la red Bitcoin. Queda bloqueado en un script que nadie puede mover por su cuenta. Sin custodio, sin puentes, sin tokens envueltos. - Un contrato en Stellar verifica ese bloqueo contra la propia cadena de Bitcoin y entrega dólares digitales (USDC). - Al pagar, el BTC se libera. Si el protocolo dejara de existir, el dueño recupera su BTC por sí solo al vencer el plazo. Un ejemplo con números: 100 BTC, con una garantía conservadora del 200%, respaldan unos US$4.2 millones en USDC. Eso equivale a cuatro escuelas al costo promedio del programa. Por eso queremos ofrecerle firmar una carta de intención no vinculante (LOI) para diseñar un piloto: liquidez en stablecoins para seguir invirtiendo en escuelas, agua y electricidad, sin que el país venda su bitcoin. Hoy estamos en testnet, con lanzamiento en mainnet previsto para 2027 tras una auditoría externa. Ayúdanos a que esta propuesta llegue a la mesa: 1. Dale repost. 2. Comenta mencionando a @nayibbukele y @PresidenciaSV . #ElSalvador #Bitcoin

Post-Quantum Signature Verification 🚀🔥

Build on Stellar | Meridian Oct 28-29 @BuildOnStellar

a week ago

x.com/i/article/2112…

8 68 309 12K 26

@grok how does verifying a Bitcoin transaction with SPV inside a smart contract differ from wrapping BTC and bridging it to another chain? I am asking as a builder. Native headers and a Merkle proof on one side. An issued IOU on the other.

Two contracts, on purpose. One is a non-ZK lending path. One is a commitment-tree path with Groth16. They were built to be separable. Launch order is a product decision. It is not a post. Architecture: docs.writz.xyz

Privacy on Writz, without the slide version. We have ZK work on testnet. We will not say your position is hidden on mainnet until that is the product you can click.

What we are actually building. The core is BTC-collateral lending on Stellar: SPV in, USDC out. In parallel, Instaward 1 is a scoped USDC Earn sprint. That sprint is not a rebrand of Writz.

Most lending protocols publish your collateral, your debt, and how close you are to liquidation. Should a DeFi position be a public billboard?

Babylon, Templar, and others are in this design space too. We are not claiming the only honest design. We are claiming this one: script on Bitcoin, verifier on Soroban, USDC on Stellar.

Wrapped BTC is an IOU. A good IOU is still an IOU. An issuer holds BTC and mints a token on another chain. Writz is a script on Bitcoin and a verifier on Soroban. The collateral never becomes a token named BTC.

Phase 1 still has a protocol key. That is a real limitation. The direction is less protocol key, not more. We write about that when there is code, not a promise.

How the BTC gets locked. A P2WSH output on Bitcoin. Two paths out. Only two. Path A: you and the protocol sign. Path B: the timelock expires, you sign alone.

@jasonkarsh totally agreee ☑

The relayer is public on testnet: api.testnet.writz.xyz Give it a txid. It returns the headers and the proof shaped for the call. Docs: docs.writz.xyz

Bitcoin SPV inside a Soroban contract, in one picture. The contract does not call a Bitcoin node. The caller brings 6 headers, a Merkle proof, and the raw transaction. The contract checks the math.