This is really all you need to know about the Cass Review
This is really all you need to know about the Cass Review https://t.co/3KxKMu2Cwg
@GBBranstetter Would really like to know how the methodology was developed and who thought to constrain it to purely scientific assessments (testing criteria). Imagine doing a blind study? That's Mengele territory...
@Znapkel_Zeppo @GBBranstetter Systematic scientific review. York University was commissioned and found 3000 international papers. 103 were deemed to be of sufficient quality for the review. Conclusion - poor evidence of +ve outcomes, high risks and evidence to support watchful waiting.
@Debscorb123 @GBBranstetter Not likely. And CBC did a great analysis. Their conclusions: too much bias, not enough attention to non-clinical research and reviews.