Peter Manning @agolfman

@LinksGems 1. The arrival of a long rectangular brown box on your porch 2. The time you spend teaching your kids this game 3. Ice water refills at the turn 4. The next putter you buy 5. Masters Thursday.

0 0 2 105 0

View Details

Peter Manning @agolfman

a month ago

@YipStrickler @USGA Clubs need to embrace all net events to only use “low index from past 12 months”. This isn’t perfect but it’s good enough.

1 0 4 713 0

View Details

Peter Manning @agolfman

a month ago

@chrisrusso115 @stoolpresidente Why not go all in and just embrace this and say that it’s due to power and control? ID in all contexts is simply a validation of eligibility. To say otherwise just demonstrates a willingness to repeat what you’ve been conditioned to say.

0 0 2 227 0

View Details

Peter Manning @agolfman

2 months ago

@Mike_kim714 315

0 0 1 12 0

View Details

Peter Manning @agolfman

2 months ago

@MyGolfSpy Missed the Pelz putting tutor!

0 0 0 2K 0

View Details

Peter Manning @agolfman

2 months ago

@NathanChambers4 @JeffOstler1 @OleBeeM @LouStagner It doesn’t matter because they accounted for this with an actual local rule. The local rule is terrible, IMO but it’s the rule for as long as it’s a rule.

1 0 1 19 0

View Details

Peter Manning @agolfman

2 months ago

@flushingitgolf Accidental or even heavy stepping is enough to cause a penalty. Poor judgement here, but there’s a hundred other players who are protected here.

1 0 0 437 0

View Details

Peter Manning @agolfman

3 months ago

@RonDeSantis @EndWokeness If you had to tax something, this would be a good place to start.

0 0 0 11 0

View Details

Peter Manning @agolfman

3 months ago

@GolfMonthly I think a missing analysis is the frequency of 325+ yard drives. Honestly, every shot on the broadcasts seem to blow through this mark. In turn, this is the key to birdies or better.

0 0 0 17 0

View Details

Peter Manning @agolfman

3 months ago

@LouStagner Well, sure…NLU may be a case where the narrative may not fit. That doesn’t make Jack wrong though. Manufacturers and player do share the same interest here though: Monetization objectives.

0 0 0 15 0

View Details

Peter Manning @agolfman

4 months ago

@LouStagner I never have bought the USGA analysis of slower distance gains than we see every week. Their motivations are to grow the game and by doing so, they ignored this issue as to not disenfranchise the top players and their equipment relationships.

0 0 0 47 0

View Details

Peter Manning @agolfman

4 months ago

@NUCLRGOLF @thetimes Pro golf, and all pro sports, are just monetizatuon schemes. Not I hereby lay wrong, but let’s not pretend or romanticize it. Maintaining sponsorships is the #1 focus of all the tours. That’s fine, but it is the reality.

0 0 0 61 0

View Details

Peter Manning @agolfman

5 months ago

@Barrel1984 @DanOnGolfShow @Skratch @manorsgolf @PGATOUR I’m not disagreeing about the content angle, it is wild. It’s just another person piling on. I’m all for more golf that’s all.