Rajesh Parikh @ancvisit

After the protests and the notice issued by the Supreme Court, wisdom has dawned on the ECI and Mr Gyanesh Kumar S.I.R. has been abandoned for the 17 remaining States and UTs, and it will only be the customary SSR (special summary revision) Documents to prove citizenship need not be produced Why were 20 States discriminated against under S.I.R. and 13,30,00,000 names (including the dead) were removed without Due Process? After removing crores of names illegally, now the ECI has undertaken another exercise to include the 'left out' voters! Mr Gyanesh Kumar should be surcharged for the double expenditure

Fearless mongoose takes on a deadly black cobra! 😱🐍🦦 What a battle of speed, courage, and survival instincts! 🔥

LOOK WHAT I FOUND 😲 a new open-source model that just hit #1 on Hugging Face and it runs fully local on a 16GB laptop it is called Spark-X2.5-4B: → 4 billion parameters  → native 1 million token context window  → runs completely offline and private  → strong coding + agent capabilities  → works with Ollama, LM Studio, llama.cpp, etc. no cloud and no data leaving your machine. it's free and open source. repo:  github.com/XHToken/Spark-… save this for later.

Nexx @nex_ify

3 weeks ago

yesterday was a LOT, OpenAI dropped a whole pile of updates around DevDay here’s what stood out to me: GPT-6.1 Sol: near Astra performance for coding, computer use and professional tasks, at $2/$10 per 1M input/output tokens. Astra Ultrafast: faster token generation for

5 0 17 55K 6

The Indian Express has come out with another revelation of the machinations for deletion of names of genuine voters during the current SIR exercise. The Indian Express investigation reveals that persons have been set up by a political party – evidence points to the BJP – in constituencies whose job is to file objections to the enlistment of voters who have voted against that party. One person files 100–200 applications in Form 7 per day, objecting to the enrolment of voters who have voted against them or may vote against them in future - on various false grounds – mostly that they do not live at the address they have given in their application for enrollment, or that they are dead. Each Form 7 is to be signed by the objector - So, he signs 100 forms in his own name or under different fictitious names. He gives a declaration that what he is alleging is true even if it is false. He sends the objections to the Electoral Registration Officer in bulk though the objector is supposed to file each application personally. The voter whose inclusion has been challenged does not even know that the inclusion of his name has been challenged. A notice is issued to him by the ERO which he does not receive because the ERO does not take the trouble to actually communicate the notice to the voter. The voter does not appear, and his name gets left out of the Roll. All social workers who want democracy to prevail need to do two things: 1. The voters need to be informed about what is happening. Let every social worker do so. Let every political party do so. They must check that notices are issued and served by the EROs in cases where objections have been filed. 2. It will turn out that a large number of declarations in Form 7 filed by objectors are false. This is an offence under Section 31 of the Representation of the People Act and Sections 171, 227, 228, 229, 233, 234, 236 and 237 of the BNS. Where an Electoral Registration Officer deletes a name without enquiries, or accepts false declaration without verification, he is liable for prosecution under Section 32 of the Representation of the People Act and Sections 49, 233 and 237 of the BNS. Criminal cases need to be lodged against the objectors and EROs by the voters who have been affected; and the social and political workers need to help them in this. Once criminal cases start getting lodged by the voters this “Vote Chori” will stop.

Serval is an African wild cat, fast and dangerous than snake

An open letter to all my countrymen. Do you want India to remain a democracy? Then you must understand what Gyanesh Kumar, the CEC, and his bosses are doing in the so-called SIR. They are violating the law. - As per Section 21 of the law, a special revision is to be undertaken only in special cases, for reasons to be recorded in writing in each case; and that also only in any constituency or part of a constituency. An order for intensive revision for the whole country was illegal. An exception allowed for special cases cannot become the rule. The Supreme Court order upholding the general SIR was wrong. Another question is - who took the decision for SIR in the whole country? Was it the full commission; or only Gyanesh Kumar. - Section 21 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, provides that where the revision of an electoral roll is taken up, the electoral roll in force at the time of the issue of the notification of revision shall continue in effect till the completion of the revision. The revised electoral rolls become complete only after all the appeals filed against inclusion or deletion are disposed off. Where the appeals were still pending, the original Electoral roll which was valid on the date of notification was to be used. Contrary to this the new roll with deletions was used during the elections even though appeals against deletions were still pending. This was illegal. - Section 22 of the RP Act provides that the Electoral Registration Officer, and not anyone else, can remove a voter's name from the roll and that also only on the grounds listed in Section 22(a), (b), and (c); and only after a specific enquiry, after giving the concerned person a reasonable opportunity of being heard, and only after appeals against his order are disposed off. Gyanesh Kumar removed the names of all the voters who had been listed by the ERO's after 2003, without any basis, without any enquiry, and without any show cause to the registered voters. This was blatantly illegal. The persons whose names were removed summarily had to apply as fresh voters in Form 6 and give evidence that they were eligible to be registered. This is a clear violation of the Supreme Court judgement in Lal Babu Hussain and Others v. Electoral Registration Officer and Others, [(1995) 3 SCC 100], which held that the enquiry authority or the objector and not the voter - must bring forth material evidence to back any claim that an enrolled voter be disqualified. And in such cases the voter must be asked to show cause why his name should not be removed on the basis of the grounds adduced by the enquiry officer. All this did not happen. The established jurisprudence is that the onus to prove that there are sufficient grounds for subjecting any person to a disability or punishment is on the person or institution which is seeking to inflict the punishment. Here, Gyanesh Kumar has inverted the burden of proof. This is also against the law. Up to now, the efforts of the Government and the Election Commission have always been to enroll all eligible voters. It was a mission to deepen democracy and empower all citizens. This is the first time in history of the country that the mission is to disenfranchise people. Gyanesh Kumar added a new appendix to Form 6. He was not authorised to do so, as Form 6 is mandated by statutory rules. And he added this himself – against the views of the two election commissioners. The decisions of the commission are to be taken either unanimously – or by a majority. The majority was against the addition of the new appendix to the form. So the addition of the new appendix was against the decisions of the Commission itself. So why was it added? On whose orders? This was illegal. This appendix asks the applicant to state the serial number in the 2003 voter list on which their parents' names were listed. Where can an ordinary person – a young man of 18; access the 2003 roll in 2026? This stopped the registration of all young voters. BJP knows that young voters will not vote for it. Objections to inclusion of voters names in form 7 were filed in bulk. Who filed them? How were the forms accepted and acted upon when the persons who signed it did not appear? Names of 16 lac voters found valid by the ERO were not registered in Bengal because, it seems, the EC filed appeals against them. Why? On which grounds? Who authorised the Commission to file appeals? Two Election Commissioners say they did not do so. So the Commission did not authorise anyone to file appeals. Who did it? Gyanesh Kumar? These people were prevented from voting in the election. So the Election Commission and some people from a political party were acting in cahoots to get bogus Form 7 objections filed in bulk and delete names? How were elections allowed to be held when the appeals of lakhs of voters were pending? The ECI and the Supreme Court have to answer. The appeals which have been decided show that 90% of the voters who were left out were valid. A ridiculous thing was brought up called "logical discrepancy". Gyanesh Kumar does not have any idea of how the poor live in India. Their children are not born in hospitals. They do not have birth certificates. They do not have calendars in their homes. When the BLO approached them to enroll them in the voter list they gave their estimated year of birth. Similarly, when their fathers' names were enrolled in the electoral roll, they gave their estimated year of birth. The dumb people in the Election Commission, under Gyanesh Kumar, said that any difference of less than 15 years between father and children would be a logical discrepancy justifying excluding their names. The “Logical Discrepancy” names were excluded without enquiry, contrary to sec 21 of the act. The largest number of exclusions have been the poor and the underprivileged, those without a voice. They were and are mostly away from their homes, earning their daily bread. Lakhs are working in faraway places/states. They could not and cannot afford to go back to their homes for a month to get their names registered. They will go hungry if they do not earn. They cannot fill the complicated forms. They do not have birth certificates and the papers. Why should they sacrifice their daily wages for a vote? The illegal immigrants are not affected. The first thing they do on entering India is to get their documentation made—Aadhaar card, ration card, etc. The earlier immigrants are their support systems. It is the poor Indian citizens who have been disenfranchised. The dumb people in the Election Commission and their bosses did not understand this. Or they wanted it this way. Gyanesh Kumar has made a digital electoral roll and empowered it to refuse addition of names because of “Logical discrepancy”. In the name of "Logical discrepancy", the names of millions of voters have not been included. This is against the law. The only authority designated by law to add or delete names and publish the electoral rolls is the Electoral Registration Officer. Contrary to this, the electoral roll was centralised and the revision happened centrally. This was illegal. Two Election Commissioners pointed out that the only people authorized to add or delete names – the ERO, the DEO and the CEO were not being allowed to access the voter list. In Goa, 97 electors were found by the ERO to be valid and fit for inclusion in the roll. They have not been able to add their names to the roll as yet. The centralisation of the voter list amendment is dangerous. It can be used to cut voters from booths which vote against NDA. Is this what happened? Deleting voters names before verification is a heinous offence, and Gyanesh Kumar is guilty thereof. 13 crores names have been deleted by SIR so far. This is 13% of the voters, and SIR is not over. The difference between NDA and INDIA in the 2024 elections was only 3%. So the deletion have had and will have a material impact on the elections. The press note issued after the Commission meeting on 26th September confirms the illegalities mentioned above. Did Gyanesh Kumar commit all these illegalities himself or was he directed to do so by his bosses? The Opposition says that they will impeach Gyanesh Kumar. That is an exercise in futility. They just do not have the numbers. If they really want a remedy, they should file criminal cases against Gyanesh Kumar. The next step to be taken is that all opposition parties should unite and say that they will not participate in any election till the CEC and Election Commissioners' resign and the selection of their successors is as per the previous selection system, with the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition, and a sitting Supreme Court judge. Elections held in states while the appeals of lakhs of voters were pending must be set aside and fresh elections held. And the poll must be held by ballot not by EVMs because no electronic system has yet been invented which cannot be hacked. That is why none of the economically and digitally advanced countries use EVMs. If we want to preserve our democracy the whole country will need to be made aware and united. The reputation of the Supreme Court has been besmirched by the judgement on SIR. It is at par in infamy with the judgement upholding the emergency. Hon’ble Judges may please note. The procrastination on the challenge to the law on selection of Election Commissioners is also sending a bad message about the Supreme Court – as it is an open and shut case that the Election Commissioners should not be selected by the party in power; but by a neutral selection committee to ensure their neutrality. Let us unite to save our democracy. RK Singh (IAS Retd. Ex Union Home Secretary) @abhijeet_dipke @Cockroachisback @RahulGandhi @kharge @ArvindKejriwal @MamataOfficial @yadavakhilesh @mkstalin @yadavtejashwi @Pawankhera

Before we had silicon chips, we had needle and thread. In the 1960s, NASA didn’t ‘upload’ code; they sewed it. To get Apollo 11 to the moon, skilled weavers (often called ‘Little Old Ladies’) literally hand-stitched software into physical objects.

Yvon Chouinard, the founder of Patagonia, has made the planet itself the sole beneficiary and effective "shareholder" of his company. In an extraordinary move that redefined corporate ownership, Chouinard transferred full control of the $3 billion outdoor apparel brand away from his family. He placed 100% of the company into a carefully designed structure consisting of a trust and a nonprofit organization, both dedicated to combating the climate crisis and protecting the natural world. Under this new arrangement, the Chouinard family gave up any claim to personal profits. Instead, all earnings not reinvested in growing the business—roughly $100 million each year—now flow directly to environmental causes, funding the preservation of wild lands, conservation efforts, and initiatives to fight climate change. In essence, Patagonia now exists to serve Earth as its only true shareholder, placing planetary survival above the accumulation of private wealth. The model has already delivered significant results. As of 2025, the company had channeled an additional $180 million into nature-protection projects. The structure relies on two key entities: the Patagonia Purpose Trust, which safeguards the company’s original mission and values, and the Holdfast Collective, a nonprofit that directs the profits toward high-impact environmental work. Rather than selling the business to the highest bidder or taking it public, Chouinard chose this radical path—creating what many see as a groundbreaking template for purpose-driven capitalism. Patagonia has shown that a for-profit company can become a powerful force for ecological restoration while remaining financially successful. [Chouinard, Y. (2022). Patagonia's Next Chapter: Earth is Now Our Only Shareholder. Patagonia Works]

एक मंझे हुए एक्टर से ऐसी उम्मीद न थी। सब सही था,फोकस सही था, लाइटिंग सही थी, मेकअप ओके था, चेहरे पर गजब का कॉन्फिडेंस था, नज़रे कैमरा से 30° कोण बनाते हुए हल्का चिन-अप, एक हाथ जेब में , दूसरे से फाईल पकड़े आप सेंटर ऑफ द फ्रेम में थे.... पीछे दो लोग परफेक्ट V एंगल पर थे... तीनों का दायां पैर आगे था, कदमताल करते हुए ये एक जहीन, पढ़े-लिखे, साउथ इंडियन हीरो की एंट्री का कहर सीन था, पता नहीं साहब कैसे फाइल में कागज डालना भूल गए। इस छोटी सी गलती ने फिल्म डुबो दी...🤣

@Nikunj21129 @SamsungMobile @SamsungMobileUS @SamsungIndia Get a 512 MB 17 pro. Used and in new condition. Or a new one. It's beautiful. I'm using 16 pro. Superb it is.

Today, we’re announcing Ternary Bonsai 2 27B. Based on Qwen3.8 27B, Bonsai 2 27B is 9x smaller than its full-precision counterpart while retaining 98.2% of its aggregate benchmark performance. Two months after the first Bonsai 27B release, the biggest change is quality. The footprint remains 5.9 GB, but the gap to full precision has narrowed materially, with particularly strong gains in agentic coding, multimodal reasoning, and long-horizon tool use. Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is available today under Apache 2.0.

Thank you @SamsungMobile @SamsungMobileUS for pushing update. Now 5th green line appeared after update on 15/Sept/2026. Great going. @SamsungIndia

Thinking Indian (Dr.Nikunj) @Nikunj21129

2 months ago

So @SamsungMobile & @SamsungIndia employs classic policy exclusion, without even reviewing the case. When you post on social media, they just act as if they're reviewing your case, in reality they don't. #donotBuySamsung

2 2 1 3K 1

Modi invented Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code in 2016 exactly for making money out of loan write-offs. Arun Shourie exposed this several years ago. They'll write off 99.97% of the loan and take money from the promoter who will buy back the business cleverly using their relatives. Here gives an clear example of how it is done. Make no mistake @narendramodi, has institutionalized corruption in this country. It took British 200 years to loot this country and he is doing it in record time.

I think the govt is underestimating middle class anger. People are fed up with paying income tax & getting nothing in return except for collapsing infrastructure & now, an economy also near collapse At the same time tax payers money is being used to bail out billionaires, to write off their debts & hand state assets over to them It’s easy to see why the beleaguered middle class is so angered by this kind of crony capitalism

Gurdeep Singh Sappal @gurdeepsappal

2 months ago

अगर सुभाष चंद्रा के क़र्ज़ वाले मामले ने आपको झकझोर दिया है, तो कुछ और जानकारी आपको दिलचस्प लगेगी। नीचे ऐसे टॉप केस हैं जिनमें IBC क़ानून के तहत फ़ैसले हुए हैं। ये जानकारी सितंबर 2024 तक की है। @INCIndia @kharge @RahulGandhi

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

145 2K 4K 281K 504

study calculus. not because you need to pass an exam. because calculus teaches you how the world changes. • derivatives → how fast something is changing right now • integrals → how tiny changes accumulate into something larger • differential equations → how systems evolve through time • partial derivatives → how one variable changes inside a system with many moving parts • gradients → which direction changes something fastest • optimization → finding the best solution under constraints then connect it to reality. • velocity is the derivative of position. • acceleration is the derivative of velocity. • energy can be accumulated through integration. • control systems are built around changing states. • neural networks learn using gradients. • physics is full of differential equations. don’t memorize calculus as a collection of formulas. draw it. simulate it. derive it. write code for it. connect it to motion and physical systems. calculus becomes beautiful when you stop seeing x and y. and start seeing change.

These 3D elevation maps reveal the true shape of every continent — not as flat outlines on a page, but as they actually exist in three dimensions. The differences are extraordinary. [🎞️ discovertheplanet]

How a Transformer Works ⚡ | The Science Behind Voltage transformation

Trump didn’t forget what Narendra Modi said. He just didn’t listen. A compromised PM is not taken seriously. It is painful to see what India has been reduced to under Narendra Modi. Once a formidable force. Today, taken for granted. PS: Why is Modi so afraid of press freedom — at home and abroad?

Shashank Mattoo @MattooShashank

2 months ago

India specifically requested no press conference at the Trump-Modi meeting at G7 Trump initially agreed, then forgot about it and did a 45-minute press conference sitting next to Modi

96 970 4K 783K 375

👇🏾👇🏾

PenPencilDraw @penpencildraw

2 months ago

Bal Narender.

41 552 2K 63K 147