Even assuming Cotton's claims are correct - and he has a history of issues going back to audit of 2020 race - what part of the legal precedent that appellate courts don't consider new evidence seems to have escaped discussion?
Even assuming Cotton's claims are correct - and he has a history of issues going back to audit of 2020 race - what part of the legal precedent that appellate courts don't consider new evidence seems to have escaped discussion?
108
2K
3K
430K
284
@azcapmedia 👏 you’re correct. I’ve been saying this for weeks. It’s a joke of a petition for cert.