“Leave fossil fuels in the ground. It’s so simple” Writer George Monboit says that as a result of oil and gas industry influence, the COP conferences are unsuccessfully “preventing climate breakdown” and not enough action is being taken #bbcqt bit.ly/41aIq0i
@bbcquestiontime What a whopper. I wonder how much fuel he used to travel to his 25 pointless meetings?
@bbcquestiontime . BBC Questiontime . x.com/TheLastPersont…
@bbcquestiontime The guy is literally wearing fossil fuel spectacles.
@bbcquestiontime @ThierryAaron Overall - it is up to the consumer. Demand from CONSUMERS has changed the direction of the auto industry. We will do what the govt & corporations are afraid to do.
OK. We leave fossil fuels in the ground. Where's the lost 50% of our electricity generation going to come from? We barely have enough right now, never mind if everyone has an EV and a heat pump. What he really advocates is a return to a pre-industrial economy. With poverty, famine and depopulation.
@bbcquestiontime Defund the BBC Stop paying your tv licence people Dis information Bias Broadcasting Gutter Press Journalism Anti Israel
@bbcquestiontime And if the science changes and we figure out it's nothing to do with CO2...🤷♂️ x.com/keillerdon/sta…
@bbcquestiontime And if the science changes and we figure out it's nothing to do with CO2...🤷♂️ x.com/keillerdon/sta…
@bbcquestiontime This is a rich fed person thanks to Fossil Fuel and fossil fuel products. His generation and the ones after him will flourish thanks to oil. And yet this person doesn't want poor, hungry 1.4 Billion Africans to have access to cheap reliable energy. x.com/juspermachogu/…
@bbcquestiontime This is a rich fed person thanks to Fossil Fuel and fossil fuel products. His generation and the ones after him will flourish thanks to oil. And yet this person doesn't want poor, hungry 1.4 Billion Africans to have access to cheap reliable energy. x.com/juspermachogu/…
Title: The Role of the UN: Balancing Global Priorities and National Interests Introduction: The United Nations and its associated agencies, such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the World Health Organization play a vital role in addressing global challenges. However, concerns have been raised regarding the influence of these agencies on sovereign democracy and financial independence. In this article, we will critically examine the impact of the UN, IPCC, and WHO, considering the backdrop of the significant 1992 Rio Earth Summit and the establishment of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change 1. The Rio Earth Summit and the UNFCCC: The 1992 Rio Earth Summit marked a significant milestone for global environmental governance. The UNFCCC, signed by 197 governments, aimed to address climate change and stabilize CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere. However, it is important to note that the specific numerical thresholds, such as 550 ppm and later 450 ppm, were not scientifically supported but emerged from "scientific assessments" conducted by the IPCC. While the signing of this agreement gave the United Nations significant influence over energy policies, which are fundamental to the security and financial stability of nations, it also raised concerns about the potential impact on national sovereignty. 2. The Role of the IPCC: As an agency of the UN, the IPCC is primarily funded by taxpayer money and operates with the mandate to review and synthesize existing scientific literature. Its primary role is to provide policymakers with a comprehensive assessment of climate change science. However, it is important to acknowledge that the IPCC also has a broader agenda to support and implement UN policies. While this is meant to ensure a coordinated global response to climate change, some argue that it raises concerns about subverting sovereign democracy and creating a one-world government under the technocracy of the United Nations. 3. Balancing Global Priorities and National Interests: The UN and its agencies operate in a complex global landscape, where the need to balance global priorities and national interests is crucial. The involvement of governments in signing international agreements demonstrates their recognition of the importance of addressing global challenges collectively. However, it is also important to recognize that the United Nations is an unelected body that is not directly accountable to the people. This, coupled with the fact that it tends to house a large number of failed and disgraced ex-politicians, raises concerns about transparency and democratic accountability. Financial commitments made by governments without the direct will of the people should be subject to scrutiny and accountability to ensure the preservation of financial independence and democratic principles. By critically examining the impact and influence of the UN, IPCC, and WHO, we can foster a deeper understanding of the delicate balance between global priorities and national interests. While recognizing the importance of collective action in addressing global challenges, it is essential to maintain transparency, accountability, and democratic principles to ensure the well-being of nations and their citizens.
Title: Tackling Climate Change and Wildfires: A Comprehensive Approach for a Sustainable Future Introduction: As the debate on climate change intensifies, it is crucial to approach the topic with a balanced perspective. This article aims to provide a comprehensive approach that challenges climate alarmism while acknowledging the need to address the impact of wildfires. By understanding the potential risks and limitations of climate science, setting realistic baselines for CO2 levels, and examining the role of international organizations, we can pave the way for effective solutions that promote a sustainable future. The Potential Arrogance of Climate Science: Playing "God" with CO2 Levels: While climate science plays a vital role in understanding and mitigating climate change, it is essential to consider the potential risks associated with manipulating atmospheric CO2 levels. By examining the proposed baselines of 180 ppm and 280 ppm, we can assess the impact of human activities and develop strategies for reducing carbon emissions. However, it is crucial to recognize the complexities of Earth's climate system and avoid assuming an unwarranted level of control over nature. The Importance of CO2 for Life: Acknowledging the importance of CO2 for life on Earth is crucial in the climate change debate. Dangerously low levels of atmospheric CO2 can have detrimental effects on plant and animal life. While the current CO2 levels are higher than in the past, it is essential to understand the historical context and the role CO2 plays in supporting life on our planet. The Role of the UN: Balancing Global Priorities and National Interests: International organizations such as the United Nations, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and World Health Organization (WHO) play a crucial role in addressing global challenges. However, concerns have been raised regarding their influence on national sovereignty and financial independence. By critically examining the impact of these organizations, we can ensure a balance between global priorities and national interests. Challenging the Climate Alarmism Narrative: Unanswered Questions and Arbitrary Targets: While mainstream media promotes climate alarmism, it is essential to raise pertinent questions and challenge the prevailing narrative. Understanding the natural climate variations and historical context of sea-level rise is crucial in assessing the human impact on climate change. Additionally, questioning the arbitrary thresholds and unanswered questions surrounding the consequences and timeline of surpassing CO2 levels can foster a more informed discussion. Tackling Wildfires and Making a Huge Difference: Addressing the issue of wildfires, particularly in the Boreal Forest, is a significant step towards reducing global emissions. With adequate financial budgeting and increased investment in wildfire suppression and forestry management, we can make a monumental impact on global emissions. By holding governments accountable for resource allocation and providing compensation to affected communities, we can ensure a safer environment for all. Conclusion: In the high-level debate on climate change, it is essential to present a factual and accurate assessment while challenging climate alarmism. By acknowledging the potential risks and limitations of climate science, setting realistic baselines for CO2 levels, and addressing the impact of wildfires, we can pave the way for effective solutions.