Data from the first year of our new approach to publishing!! In brief, we are still seeing the same quantity and caliber of papers. But the process feels much more constructive. For Editors, and for authors. Data: tinyurl.com/mrnmrayk Editorial: tinyurl.com/3kf256u6
Data from the first year of our new approach to publishing!! In brief, we are still seeing the same quantity and caliber of papers. But the process feels much more constructive. For Editors, and for authors. Data: tinyurl.com/mrnmrayk Editorial: tinyurl.com/3kf256u6
Thanks so much to all the authors who have trusted in us, and to the epic folks at @eLife who have made it happen!
@behrenstimb Do you think reviewers are more constructive because this model constrains/removes their 'gatekeeping' role? (This is my hunch). And any thoughts on how to quantify 'constructivity'?
@behrenstimb @blamlab The number of submissions is a very neoliberal way to measure success.