Don’t be Brainwashed @chambleeusa

🚨🚨THE DEMOCRACY FILES, PART 2: WHEN AND HOW TO DECLARE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ILLEGITIMATE 🚨 Some questioned whether a group of 200 ex-USAID officials could actually pull off their ambitions to rewrite the Constitution. Here, they describe exactly how it works. They aren't working alone. The videos all come from Renew to Thrive (R2T) group and associates. Danielle Reiff and Paul Zeitz play key roles within R2T. R2T sits inside a much, much larger umbrella called United Democracy Alliance (UDA), which is an extremely hush-hush control plane of leaders from major "blocking" NGOs such as 50501 and Indivisible fulfilling various functions. UDA decides when protests get deployed, timelines, how to respond, all that. R2T's role within UDA is concerned with "the day after tomorrow" - in other words, their function is to conceive what a rewritten American government will look like after the rest of UDA fulfills its purpose. As will be shown, Erica Chenoworth is credited with conceiving UDA in the first place under the Horizons "Big Tent" initiative. Note here that National Security Leaders for America (NSL4A) is credited for operationalizing UDA. NSL4A is a group of 1,600 ex-military, intelligence, and diplomatic officials. They are led by Rear Admiral Michael E. Smith (Ret). NSL4A also played a key role in the "illegal orders" messaging which targeted Pete Hegseth. Zeitz is also a member of NSL4A. It must be emphasized that the choice of a military-oriented organization to coordinate NGOs across domestic protests is an interesting one all in itself - especially in an umbrella conceived by a regime change expert like Chenoworth. You will have a hard time finding any mentions of UDA in the public. They are extremely hush-hush and selective who they talk to. Mike Smith himself makes a personal appearance in other calls, coordinating Insurrection Act exercises and roleplaying with R2G as one of the participants. As the audio transcript shows, they have outlined a sequence of "redlines" in which case the federal government should be declared illegitimate. Invoking the Insurrection Act against "peaceful" protesters is one of the most discussed redlines. I will post the illegitimate criteria below, but basically, almost any effective pushback against NGOs is a measure of illegitimacy according to them. Important to understand: The audio shows they shopped this idea around governors, but the reality is that governors do not have to explicitly sign on to the pact to play their role in the coup. All they have to do is refuse troops in their state and let UDA / R2G do the work of dissolving the federal government.

The past few days, I got my hands on thousands of new transcripts and hundreds of recordings, thanks to leads from @SKDoubleDub33 and @iamlisalogan . You've heard that the DSA is proposing structural reforms to America, including abolishing the Senate and imposing term limits. What you not have heard is - there is an operational plan to put it all into action. If the Democratic Party sweeps 2026, then DSA will become "foot soldiers" in constant clashes with the administration to cross a "red line" or invoke a "doomsday scenario" - meaning, President Trump invokes the Insurrection Act, probably sometime in 2027. Then, a lot of coordinated responses kick off, including delegitimizing the federal government itself and handing that legitimacy to Democratic governors. 2028 then becomes a vote on whether to keep America governance as-is or to burn it all down to appease a "young and brown" demographic. The mysterious group who's been coordinating 50501, Indivisible, and coordinating the NoKings protests is called "United Democracy Alliance" and their intellectual leader is Erica Chenoweth who came up with the 3.5% rule of nonviolent regime change. Patience. I know I've hyped this more than anything else. It's genuinely the biggest discovery I've had. This is an enormous archive. This is only the beginning.

@FinalTelegraph 🇺🇸

Trump’s race to launch nuclear microreactors changes everything | Joanne Nova, CFACT It’s just transformative — throw away the transition plans! A year ago Donald Trump decided to reignite nuclear power research –– his goal in June 2025 was to develop three new advanced nuclear reactors and get them to reach criticality by July 4th this year for the 250th celebrations. In the end they got four across the line. One of them, created by an Australian Bobby Gallagher, was a latecomer to the race, but managed to build a new microreactor design, with some help from the US Energy Department, in an awe-inspiring 150 days. Australia is such a backwater, his work wouldn’t even be legal here. We have more uranium than any country on Earth, but it’s buried under ten million square kilometers of stupid red tape. The microreactor on the ute in the photo is 1 megawatt with a target cost of 15 cents per kilowatt hour. It is expected to run for five years before refueling, and is called the Unity Nuclear Battery. The plan at the moment is to sell them commercially starting (wow) in 2028. With mass production and fine tuning the team at Deployable Energy hope to get the cost of electricity down eventually to as little as 5 cents a kilowatt hour. All those batteries, the transmission lines to pointless solar arrays and windmills we don’t need are being superseded even as they are being built. Bobby Gallagher sees the next grid moves as “fire to fission” where natural gas is the bridge to small nuclear. The 1MW microreactors can be used for mines and remote communities to replace diesel generators. Even if only a quarter of this goes to plan, the mass production of microreactors will wipe out any feeble pretense that we need “low emission” unreliable generators when there are near zero emission, cheaper and more reliable alternatives. At this point, the only sensible thing to do is pause our entire grid redevelopment, repair the coal plants, and wait a few years. The last thing we want is to invest $200 billion on an outdated, fire-prone, unreliable, expensive disposable renewables grid destined for landfill. Venezaustralia, here we come? Graham Lloyd wrote about this in The Australian Nuclear power on the back of a truck moves closer to reality in the US A fleet of reactors can be used depending on whether you need 1MW, 10MW, 100MW or 1000MW of power. It does not require water for cooling, can be buried underground, can replace gas to back up renewables and uses only a tiny fraction of the land needed for other power sources to generate the same output. Gallagher’s company, Deployable Energy, boasts its microreactor has been designed to use standard fuels, materials and industrial processes already available at commercial scale. The result is a system that can be produced in volume, deployed quickly and operated reliably across a wide range of applications at what the company says will be a competitive cost. The timeline from here includes full power operations under US Department of Energy authorisations at the INL in 2027, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission approval of a commercial licence in 2028, with 1GW of manufacturing capacity annually from 2030 and initial production facility essentially booked through 2035. Gallagher says the company has more than $100bn in commercial interest. The Unity Nuclear Battery is a small reactor not “a battery” but it has the convenience of working like one, except that instead of being a 2, 4 or 8 hour battery, it’s a five year one. This may well be the nuclear Armageddon the renewables industry has quietly feared for years. There have been no new nuclear power designs launched since 1973. The “Dawn of the Second Nuclear Age” | Tyler Durden, ZeroHedge What restarted it was a deadline. In May 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14301, “Reforming Nuclear Reactor Testing at the Department of Energy,” which directed the DOE to stand up a Reactor Pilot Program and get at least three new test reactors to criticality by July 4th, 2026. When that goal was announced, most of the industry called it a fantasy. The conventional wisdom is that a new reactor takes at least a decade. The order gave them roughly just twelve months. They didn’t just hit the target. They beat it. Four companies reached criticality: - Antares Nuclear — the Mark-0, a 500-kilowatt sodium heat-pipe microreactor, critical at INL on June 4th. - Valar Atomics — the Ward 250, a 100-kilowatt helium-cooled, TRISO-fueled high-temperature gas reactor, critical in Emery County, Utah on June 18th. - Deployable Energy — the Unity Nuclear Battery, a roughly 1-megawatt shipping-container reactor whose founder famously drove the core to Idaho in the bed of a Ford F-150, critical on June 30th. - Aalo Atomics — the Critical Test Reactor went critical at INL in the wee hours of July 4th, the very deadline itself. The DOE was entitled to its victory lap: for the first time in history, a single country brought four distinct advanced-reactor designs to criticality inside one month’s time. That’s never happened before in world history. For over fifty years the pace of American reactor innovation was zero. Then, on a presidential dare, four companies did the impossible in four weeks. That is the real headline — and it deserves to be spread far and wide. In one podcast Bobby Gallagher was describing Deployable Energy as more of a “shielding” company than a nuclear generator. His point was that most of the material they built and designed was for shielding, not generation. Remarkably, he praised the Department of Energy officials in Idaho, and talked about how helpful they had been with arranging approvals and with procurement of essential items. It’s strange to hear someone saying nice things about bureaucrats. It shows what an astonishing effect the right leadership can have (which is a credit to Donald Trump and Chris Wright). Clearly the public servants were as excited about the ambitious goals as the private companies were. Bowl me over… it seems so unheard of? cfact.org/2026/08/15/tru…

Communism begins by whispering that your neighbor’s blessing is your theft. That alone should tell you what spirit animates it. Every healthy impulse in the soul reaches toward gratitude, brotherhood, sacrifice, stewardship, and the hard dignity of building something worthy. Communism reverses that current. It teaches envy as virtue and division as moral awakening. It doesn’t heal the wound between men. It opens it wider, then promises power to whoever bleeds the most. Imagine two brothers standing before a fire. One built it. The other arrived cold. The decent impulse is to share the warmth. The communist impulse is to convince the second brother that the first committed a crime by striking the match. That isn’t compassion. It is quite literally spiritual sabotage. Perhaps the first generation of communists could plead ignorance. They hadn't yet seen the camps, engineered famines, purges, firing squads, and the mountains of bodies produced whenever envy was given a government. But after a century of graves (over 100 million), there is no innocence left in trying again. At that point, it is no longer an experiment. It is devotion to the thing that failed. It is, by definition, demonic. And a reasonable person can only surmise that whoever advocates for such an ideology in the 21st century, wants to watch the world burn... and is content ruling over the ashes.

Imagine the level of ideological capture required to stand shoulder to shoulder with ten thousand people in minus thirty degree weather… not to defend your own children, your own neighborhoods, your own wages, or your own sovereignty… but to protest on behalf of illegal criminal aliens who violated the law to enter the country and would never endure that cold, that sacrifice, or that risk for you. That is not compassion. That is inversion. You are freezing your body to protect people who openly reject your laws, your culture, and your nation… while ignoring citizens crushed by crime, addiction, inflation, and collapsing public order. You have been trained to feel morally superior for defending outsiders while treating your own people as expendable. No nation survives when loyalty flows outward instead of inward. No society remains sane when empathy is weaponized against self preservation. And no movement is more dangerous than one that convinces people to suffer proudly for those who would never lift a finger for them. That is not virtue. That is liberal brainwashing.

Prosecute @GovTimWalz

Nick shirley @nickshirleyy

10 months ago

🚨 Here is the full 42 minutes of my crew and I exposing Minnesota fraud, this might be my most important work yet. We uncovered over $110,000,000 in ONE day. Like it and share it around like wildfire! Its time to hold these corrupt politicians and fraudsters accountable We ALL

46K 222K 679K 144.2M 141K

A profound and articulate summary of the deliberate controlled demolition of the West. "Something is happening across the Western world... A silent shift is underway and it has a name—the inversion matrix." "The end goal? A population too confused to resist and too fragmented to unite." "The longer we stay silent, the more the inversion matrix tightens... This is about survival." "And if you're still listening, it means the program didn't fully work on you."

Stop pretending your attacks on Musk's wealth have anything to do with homelessness. Homeless deaths are rising. The homeless population is growing. Per-capita spending continues to increase. These facts indict your priorities. If you cared about outcomes, you would be arguing about what works and what fails. You are not. Nor is this really about wealth. Trillions sit inside NGOs and foundations that could go to solving world hunger, paid leave, all that. You never criticize George Soros, the Pritzkers, or Pierre Omidyar. You stopped condemning the Kochs the moment they aligned with you. Your outrage follows faction, not principle. You fixate on @elonmusk because he exists outside your epistemic bubble and threatens it. He does not require your approval or your moral framing. That is the danger. He risks exposing how much your authority depends on mutual affirmation among people who circulate legitimacy inside a closed loop and call it ethics. You are the hollowness at the center of this system, and you resent anyone who might force others to confront it. C. S. Lewis wrote about people like you in The Great Divorce: "The doors of Hell are locked on the inside." You are not being excluded because of Musk's wealth. He simply reminds you that you are refusing to leave.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Hello Dr. Snyder, Don’t worry, we’ll help end any “media silence.” The real story is how expertly managed dissent at home now mirrors the same democracy-promotion playbook exported abroad. We've noticed: 🔹 USAID organizers passing out instructions 🔹 The costly, uniform banners and art exhibitions 🔹 The scripted coordination through Indivisible groups 🔹 The massive amounts of money dispersed to Indivisible through George Soros, the original destabilizer of nations 🔹 That the same leaders of Indivisible were also discussing the colors of the color revolution" to happen in the United States - yellow and black. 🔹 That NYC No Kings literally partnered with Communists (CPUSA). Bluntly: The rallies weren't spontaneous outrage. They were an expensive, stage-managed attempt at a color revolution. Since you've urged the media to "inform the public about the facts," let's review a few. You were a Marshall Scholar, trained in a British government program that grooms future transatlantic policymakers. Your mentor, Timothy Garton Ash, has long served as an intellectual bridge for “democracy promotion” ventures in Eastern Europe, including writing an article critical of Victor Orban for clamping down on George Soros in Hungary. You sit on Council on Foreign Relations which was financed by the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation, which supported Woodrow Wilson's interventionist idealism. Its meetings were chaired by Elihu Root, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace President and Theodore Roosevelt's Secretary of State. and has had many prominent members of CIA, including the infamous Allen Dulles. Jeffrey Epstein was a member too, but that's besides the point. Your career has passed through institutions such as the Weatherhead Center at Harvard, home to Gene Sharp’s Program on Nonviolent Sanctions — the think-tank that supplied much of the theory for modern “nonviolent regime change.” You’ve since partnered with oligarch-philanthropists like Victor Pinchuk and James Temerty, whose funding networks are integral to Western information and influence operations in Ukraine. So when you urge resistance movements at home, it’s hard for us to miss the echo: the same toolkit once exported abroad now redeployed domestically, under the banner of “saving democracy.”

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

BORDERLINE INSANITY: CHAOS WASN’T AN ACCIDENT, IT WAS THE PLAN When is a border not a border? When it’s a revolving door dressed up as “compassion.” The border crisis isn’t a failure of policy - it is the policy. In the U.S, Biden promised “orderly and humane” immigration. What they got instead was overwhelmed detention centers, record-setting illegal crossings, and a quiet pipeline from the Rio Grande to 4-star hotels. Need a bed, a bus ticket, or a prepaid debit card? Welcome to America. Trump did what no one else would: closed the border, put ICE back on the streets, and made sanctuary cities sweat. So why aren’t other countries following suit? Because the chaos isn’t an American quirk - it’s a global mood. The UK is creaking under record net migration, housing asylum seekers in seaside hotels while veterans sleep rough. France and Germany are juggling spiraling migrant crime and culture clashes, but the response isn’t a crackdown - it’s a shrug. What ties it all together? A political class that’s quietly decided national borders are passé - outdated relics that get in the way of their vision: one planet, no fences, and an endless supply of grateful newcomers who just might vote the right way. Citizens get taxed. New arrivals get fast-tracked. The line between compassion and cynicism? Completely erased. And when communities push back? When protests erupt in sleepy English towns, they’re told to check their privilege, ignore their eyes, and accept that this is the future now. Borders aren’t racist. They’re real. Sovereignty isn’t hate. It’s how countries stay countries. What we’re watching isn’t a humanitarian crisis accidentally mismanaged. It’s a slow-motion erasure of control - dressed up as kindness, but paid for by people who never voted for this. The migrants aren’t the problem. The policymakers are. Because no one accidentally dismantles an entire border system across multiple continents at once. That takes planning. Sources: AP, BBC, Reuters, Financial Times, The Guardian, Al Jazeera, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Migration Policy Institute, UK Parliament Library, Mayer Brown, The Scottish Sun, Axios

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Elon Musk @elonmusk

a year ago

💯

4K 17K 80K 6.3M 2K

@pacobell12 @atensnut You probably meant Obama. Joe didn’t deport anyone

Have You Built Your "Grid" Correctly? zerohedge.com/markets/have-y…

A nation in which one administration can allow millions of unvetted illegal migrants into the country, but requires that a court vet each deportation decision in an individually adjudicated case will soon lose the values our democratic system was intended to preserve.

EXPOSED: Does the X Platform Contain Malicious Code From Twitter 1.0 to Sabotage Growth and Suppress Reach? (Thread) @elonmusk @lindayaX 1. For over four years, my account on X appears to have been subjected to an insidious and deliberate suppression tactic—one designed to cripple my growth, and inhibit my reach. Every single day, the X platform automatically “unfollows” approximately 60% of the amount of that day’s gross new followers from my account. This began under Twitter 1.0 on November 10th, 2020, and has never stopped. Important to note: This was just 3 days after the Associated Press called the election for Joe Biden on November 7th, 2020. I believe that engineers of Twitter 1.0 may have created a malicious growth suppression algorithm code (referred henceforth as MGSAC) to manipulate account growth by slowing it down to around 1/3 of the rate the account would normally be growing at. I’ve carefully laid out the evidence of this claim in data, pictures, and video below…

.@VDHanson makes a compelling case for the @realDonaldTrump tariff strategy, but gets one issue incorrect. He describes the Trump tariffs as reciprocal and proportional to those other nations have assessed on us. In actuality, the Trump tariffs were set at levels substantially above, and in many cases, at a multiple of the counterparty country’s tariff levels. Initially, the market responded favorably, up more than one percent when Trump referred to ‘reciprocal tariffs’ in his Rose Garden speech. It was only when he put up a chart showing the actual tariffs that the markets plunged. We can divine from this response that market participants are supportive of the administration using tariffs as a tool to lower the asymmetrical tariffs of our trading partners, but are highly concerned with tariff levels set well in excess of a corresponding country’s levels. So why did Trump take this approach? The answer goes back to ‘The Art of the Deal.’ Trump’s negotiating style is to ask for the moon and then settle somewhere in between. It has worked well for him in the past so he is using the same approach here. The market’s response is due to the fear that if this strategy fails and the tariffs stay in place, they will plunge our economy into a recession. And we don’t need to wait for failure as it doesn’t take long for a high degree of uncertainty to cause economic activity to slow. Press reports today have said that all deals are now on hold. This is not surprising. Capitalism is a confidence game. Uncertainty is the enemy of business confidence. The good news is that a number of countries have already approached the negotiating table to make tariff deals, which suggests that Trump’s strategy is beginning to work. Whether this is enough to settle markets next week is unknowable, but we will find out soon. The idea that Wall Street and investors are opposed to the President’s efforts to bring back our industrial base by leveling the tariff playing field is false. Our trading partners have taken advantage of us for decades after tariffs were no longer needed to help them rebuild their economies after WWII. The market is simply responding to Trump’s shock and awe negotiating strategy and factoring in some probability that it will fail or otherwise lead to an extended period of uncertainty that will sink us into a recession. The market decline has been compounded by losses incurred at so-called pod shops and other highly levered market participants that have been forced to liquidate positions as markets have declined. Stocks of even the best companies are now trading at the cheapest valuations we have seen since Covid. If the President makes continued progress on tariff deals, uncertainty will be reduced, and the market will begin to recover. As more countries come to the table, those that have held out or have reciprocated with higher tariffs will have growing concerns about being left behind. This should cause more countries to negotiate deals until we reach a tipping point where it is clear that the strategy will succeed. When this occurs, stocks will soar. Trump’s strategy is not without risk, but I wouldn’t bet against him. The more that markets support the President and his strategy, the higher the probability that he succeeds, so a stable hand on the trading wheel is a patriotic one. An important characteristic of a great leader is a willingness to change course when the facts change or when the initial strategy is not working. We have seen Trump do this before. Two days in, however, it is much too early to form a view about his tariff strategy. Trump cares enormously about our economy and the stock market as a measure of his performance. If the current strategy works, he will continue to execute on it. If it needs to be tweaked or changed, I expect he will make the necessary changes. Based on the early read, his strategy appears to be working. Let’s help him succeed. It’s the least we can do.

Freyja™ @FreyjaTarte

2 years ago

Victor Davis Hanson explains Trump’s tariffs like no one else can. #MAGA

614 8K 19K 3.1M 10K

I'm concerned that many people do not understand the historical and institutional context in which the DOGE labor reforms are unfolding. They look at this as if these are some random, chaotic, arbitrary, strange, and even cruel measures to impose on a devoted civil service. The reality is very different, and I'm not even sure that Elon entirely understands this. For more than a century, even dating back to 1883, the civil service has grown and grown without check from the elected branch, either the presidency or the legislature . The bureaucracies have ballooned from a few to 450 or so. The bloat and absurdities have grown too. Get this: no one has ever known what to do about it. Not Coolidge, not Hoover, not Nixon, not Reagan, not Clinton, no one. No president has been able to crack this nut. The only reforms ever to have made it through are those that make the administrative state bigger, never smaller. Countless cabinet secretaries have come and gone, always with the intention of making a change but leaving saddened, demoralized, outwitted, outgunned, and ultimately devoured. No president has seriously taken on this problem because they simply did not know how. The unions are powerful, the intimidation from the deep institutional knowledge is overwhelming, the fear of the media as been powerful, and every single president comes to power vaguely feeling threatened by the intelligence agencies. The industries that have captured every single agency were also far too powerful to unseat or control. This combination of institutional inertia has blocked serious reform for a full century. No one has dared. No one has even had a theory or strategy about what to do about this problem. It had become so terrible that most people in politics have simply surrendered, like homeowners who know there are rats in the basement and bats in the attic but long ago gave up trying to fix the issue. All this time, the American people have felt themselves ever more oppressed, weighed upon, taxed and regulated, spied upon, brow beaten, and otherwise overwhelmed. Voting never made any difference because the politicians no longer controlled the system. The bureaucracies ruled all. The Biden years underscored the point. We didn't even need a conscious and present executive. We only needed a figurehead to pretend to be president, just like the Soviet premiers in the old days. The institutions ran everything and the people controlled nothing. How to deal with this? Trump alone figured it out in his last term: he simply took charge of the agencies in a limited way. There were screams of horror and plots galore. They performed a long stream of clever schemes to destroy him and show him who is boss, which is not the democratically elected president but the forces behind the scenes. The job of the president, goes the message from all the insiders, is to PRETEND to be in charge but not actually do anything meaningful. Shut up, mug up, obey, and disturb nothing, let the administrative state do its thing without oversight or disruption, and then you will get your honorary library and bestselling autobiography and go down in history as great. Trump refused the deal and look what happened. Four years have gone by and Trump is back again, this time with a determination to slay this beast, one that he knows all-to-well. The efforts of DOGE and MAHA and MAGA are epic in scope, breaking a century of pathetic acquiescence toward the deep, middle, and shallow states, at last using moral courage to confront the problem head on, come what may. They are profoundly aware that they MUST act fast and with some degree of ferocity, even recklessness, else we will default back to the status quo of leaders who pretend to be in charge while the embedded system runs things behind the scenes. It has been this way for TOO LONG. The voters this time have demanded change, and mustered the faith to believe that change is possible. This is precisely what DOGE is attempting, to make good on a promise, a promise that for once the voters actually believed was credible. They simply must succeed. There might never be another chance. The way of failure is the path everyone knows the US was on, toward economic stagnation, political scolerosis, and eventual irrelevance in the unfolding of the next stage of social evolution.

@MarioNawfal Its as if they were trying to intentionally bankrupt the country and destroy middle class America

@LauraLoomer @JDVance @RoKhanna @DavidSacks Petty. Look forward

@ernielyles @BillAckman $36 trillion via bureaucratic waste and corruption implies a need for a complete re-engineering of most of our government functions. Name the engineer most able to accomplish this extraordinary feat.