Cody White @cojac

@farmingandJesus Exactly. This is an issue for the local church in exercising church discipline over members. If attention is not given to sheperding toward restoration, with measures of success, those elders implementing the discipline are in sin. Ultimately we all are Steve Lawson.

Glyphosate isn’t controversial because it’s understudied. It’s controversial because the evidence is ignored. Fact 1. This chemical is exhaustively studied: •40+ years of data. •Thousands of studies. •Reviewed repeatedly across continents. Fact 2. Global regulators agree: Every major regulatory authority that assesses real-world exposure reaches the same conclusion: •US EPA •EFSA •ECHA •Health Canada 👉 Not carcinogenic at human exposure levels. 👉 Not genotoxic. 👉 No unacceptable health risk when used as directed. This is not one agency. This is not a global conspiracy. Fact 3: The largest human study says no. •54,000+ pesticide applicators. •Followed since 1993. •No link to overall cancer. •No consistent link to non-Hodgkin lymphoma. If glyphosate caused cancer, this study should have found it. It didn’t. Fact 4: Food residues are not the issue. •Residues are far below safety limits. •Dietary exposure does not pose a cancer risk. •Drinking water exposure is not a health hazard. “Toxic” without dose is not toxicology. Fact 5: Worker exposure is also low. •Measured exposures are far below NOAELs. •Regulators repeatedly conclude: not of concern. So where does the scare come from? One outlier → IARC IARC did a hazard classification, not a risk assessment. They put glyphosate in the same category as: •Red meat. •Hot beverages. •Being a barber. IARC explicitly ignores exposure. Regulators do not. This is the entire conflict: Hazard-only classification vs Risk-based regulation. Confuse the two - and fear wins. Bottom line: No pesticide regulator on Earth currently considers glyphosate a cancer risk at real-world exposure levels. The science is boring. It’s to put a stop to the misinformation.

Great question. Jesus said that not everyone who calls him “Lord, Lord” will enter the kingdom of heaven (Matt. 7:21). If the confession on your lips doesn’t match the reality in your heart, the confession doesn’t avail. A confession of faith is supposed to be a genuine reflection of faith in the heart. If there is only a confession but no faith, then there is no salvation. “If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For with the heart one believes and is justified, and with the mouth one confesses and is saved.” -Romans 10:9-10

derek guy @dieworkwear

9 months ago

Genuine question for theologians: what is the Christian view of whether someone will go to heaven if they say "I accept Jesus as my lord and savior" at the last minute, but also say they don't actually believe in God?

2K 70 5K 1.4M 494

Coach Venables lost eight Conference games in his two seasons in the Big 12

George Stoia III @GeorgeStoia

12 months ago

Brent Venables on playing in the SEC and it being a one-possession league: “This isn't the old Big 12 days where Oklahoma destroys everybody every single week except one game of the year.” #Sooners

218 38 768 3.9M 49

@ColbyJPowell @Carson_OKC

Good men must die, but death can't kill their names.

OKLAHOMA’S TEAM! Congratulations, @okcthunder! #GoPokes | #ThunderUp

I pardoned my son. 😅

A friend says this is like Joseph’s seven years of plenty. We have 2-4 years to store up and build strong families, businesses, and churches. May God grant us longer and may He grant a true Reformation and Revival, but we must build houses on the rock that are ready for storms.

Dems Are Probably Wishing They Let Trump Win in 2020, Here's Why...

My biggest worry for the next 4 years is still the Oklahoma State defense

@andrewtwalker Except that the abortion cause won 8 out of 10 state measures…

Both these guys called me trash this week…..

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

This sort of story makes me very angry. What the government are doing to our magnificent farmers is absolutely disgusting. And no, it doesn’t just affect a few rich farmers. It affects so many family farms who are struggling to survive financially.

@DylanBuckingham @CowboySportsNet is re-airing the second half of last year’s bedlam game during the wait…

@DustyDeevers @AlanInSoCal Whose picture is on the coin?

It's Thursday and we're back to believing in OkState. Drink this Orange Kool-Aid

These images are unbelievably horrific and sickening. But they are necessary to see. People need to know the reality of abortion.

Live Action @LiveAction

2 years ago

This is what "reproductive rights" look like.

824 4K 8K 1.6M 4K

Whenever you see the sign "FREEDOM" behind Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, please realize that they are not referring to freedom from collectivist tyranny: The "freedom" that they are proclaiming is "freedom" from free-market capitalism and our constitutional republic. The "freedom" that they promise is a world free from being forced to earn a living, think and plan your life well, and a life free of bad decisions as every decision will be made for you. Free from a world of oil and gas, from individual ownership of everything, from the need to prosper and succeed. Free from a world where your thoughts are your own thoughts, free from a world of meritocracy, free from a world of autonomy, free from a world of spontaneous travel. Under the Harris and Biden Administration, you will be liberated from the cruel world of the American project and the freedom to pursue happiness that has brought wealth and prosperity to nearly every non-corrupt nation in the world. You will be liberated from the chains of liberty, of personal sovereignty. This is the "FREEDOM" Harris and Waltz are referring to.

While people have speculatively used labels like dementia or Alzheimer’s for the president’s problem, Biden is actually dying before our eyes. And he’s not the only one. livingwaters.com/the-bible-reve…