Laurel @corncobqueen

“If you want to change the world, go home and love your family.” Kentucky! Joined June 2020

Tweets

4K
Followers

1K
Following

1K
Likes

424K

Laurel @corncobqueen

5 days ago

@Kingubitto @ZuhdApprentice Yes, and no. It’s because it’s still a lady wrist/hand even though they present differently.

0 0 0 50 0

View Details

Laurel @corncobqueen

6 days ago

@Cat5SMASHICANE @Ilegvm @_vet96 You just had to go and make it weird.🤭

0 0 0 16 0

View Details

@danielgerling @Michael57347723 @BearFlagFan @jaschmd @ByronYork Besides, you argued against that when they mentioned Carson changing health policy earlier while holding high status health positions in the White House, because “retirement.” Now it’s the entire basis of your argument?

1 0 0 28 0

View Details

Laurel @corncobqueen

7 days ago

@danielgerling @Michael57347723 @BearFlagFan @jaschmd @ByronYork If they’re fussin over Ben Carson NOT being recognized for the same thing (as pot. President) do you really think they care what skin color Sayed is? It’s the hypocrisy. That of the NYT and the way in which you’ve shown your own all while pretending not to understand the argument

1 0 1 23 0

View Details

Laurel @corncobqueen

7 days ago

@danielgerling @Michael57347723 @BearFlagFan @jaschmd @ByronYork You are not a serious person. ‘Running on’ universal healthcare doesn’t qualify as “whose practice is their primary current occupation.” Even if he does, as you said, work really hard campaigning for it. Retirement does not wash away a title. Just ask all the former Presidents.

1 0 2 41 0

View Details

Laurel @corncobqueen

a week ago

@FrancisMeacham1 @julioloveswater @jessesingal Wild that it is, in fact, a little old lady shooting the shit so hard people can’t help but buy into it. She’s certainly got retirement figured out. I wonder if she believes the nonsense she spews, or just knows she’s tapped into the unlimited resource of, well, gullible idiots.

0 0 3 28 0

View Details

Laurel @corncobqueen

a week ago

@SaveAmericaUSA1 @PatJenk83193532 @CeoNunneley @robbystarbuck If a black couple said it was “their neighborhood” to another black person do you think that statement would hit the same? No. It wouldn’t miss the mark. Because it IS a neighborhood not a college parking lot. Their colors ain’t got shit to do with shit. ‘Cept it clearly does now

0 0 1 25 0

View Details

Laurel @corncobqueen

a week ago

@RB9CMS @br0therj0e @charise_lee What an absurd takeaway. It isn’t the least bit misogynistic to say she’s objectively terrible at comedy.

0 0 6 61 0

View Details

Laurel @corncobqueen

2 weeks ago

@paul_eggsNolan @KarluskaP @007LisaJones Okay, yeah. That makes sense. I thought the message (much like television being visual and auditory) was meant to be in the music, so it confused me. It’s like Taylor stating who she voted for and all the Swifties following suit. Thank you.

1 0 2 37 0

View Details

Laurel @corncobqueen

2 weeks ago

@paul_eggsNolan @KarluskaP @007LisaJones I’ve read that in the past, and have a very basic understanding of the situation, but what I don’t understand is: what did they stand to gain by doing so? Unlike with news channels, which can tell a specific narrative, I don’t get how that’s accomplished here.

1 0 2 89 0

View Details

Laurel @corncobqueen

2 weeks ago

@pootywithaduty @JimPlumDFS @mtracey @bungarsargon That’s literally just his face. The proof is in the video above. Them eyebrows just about fly off the forehead when he’s actually raising them.

1 0 3 104 0

View Details

Laurel @corncobqueen

2 weeks ago

@DaoistManifesto @SaraGonzalesTX @TheCalvinCooli1 Right? His side aren’t likely to Joe Biden his ass. Beyond that, who could/would possibly (legitimately) verify his whereabouts? We don’t swim in the same pond he does, and those who do aren’t likely to follow Sara. This is silly.

0 0 1 23 0

View Details

Laurel @corncobqueen

2 weeks ago

@Doc_Klutz @MrAndyNgo Had it been an actual woman I seriously doubt her choice of clothing would have also made the headline. Unless, of course, she had on tactical gear/clothing etc. “A female in a dress” is such an odd and off putting way to describe someone who murdered women and children.

0 0 6 79 0

View Details

Laurel @corncobqueen

2 weeks ago

@truthnow24 @bethanyshondark Nah, they didn’t even flinch. Instinct kicks in before your brain even has time to process and, more often than not, we throw our arms out to help the person before we realize we’ve done it. It rarely works out, but still, we try. I don’t disagree about the shoes, though.

0 0 1 14 0

View Details

Laurel @corncobqueen

3 weeks ago

@Vance_Rubio2028 @ianmSC I really don’t think it’s a secret. He makes it quite obvious.

0 0 1 14 0

View Details

Laurel @corncobqueen

3 weeks ago

@RightReason_NZ @KenFarmer @wrestlewithpigs This made me snicker! 🤭

0 0 2 18 0

View Details

Laurel @corncobqueen

3 weeks ago

@AlisonWattles @Irrationalbasi5 @annakhachiyan Yes. Absolutely. We’re making, what could be considered, an educated guess based solely on previous cases. It isn’t common for the mother to lose custody and it sure as sugar isn’t common for her to be banned from so many activities/outings with the child. Unless given just cause

0 0 1 13 0

View Details

Laurel @corncobqueen

3 weeks ago

@Erhea123Eve @nypost Me, too! Once you see their little faces you can’t unsee them! I think it’s rather too large for me, but I love it

0 0 0 6 0

View Details

Laurel @corncobqueen

3 weeks ago

@zToast6 @BoBoAlways01 @HistoryBoutique @mattvanswol Also, they have taken down videos of adults for the very same reason. (Kirk is an immediate example.) it’s just not typical and usually requires court intervention.

0 0 3 11 0

View Details

Laurel @corncobqueen

3 weeks ago

@zToast6 @BoBoAlways01 @HistoryBoutique @mattvanswol Revictimization is the child (or person) going through the initial (horrific) event, and then being forced to relive it (all while knowing that everyone else is seeing it too) while it’s online. I get it. The goal is to get them to age 18 before hanging them out to dry, I reckon?