cryptocompikbro @cryptocompikbro

@rugikkk my first instinct would be to close the app lol

@Y0urDumble ahaha he looks so funny

dead internet theory is f*cking real, and this fake emo weirdo just pulled 13.2M views at a Paris party with real people filming him. his creator made an estimated $5,700. 13 videos. 19M views. zero humans on camera. meet Greg: → only 13 videos with him → 19.3K followers → 1.6M likes → 19M views on just 5 of those videos → the biggest at 13.2M (video’s below) the character: purple and black fringe, a blue flannel, skinny jeans and legs that bend wrong when he dances. pure 2007. he doesn’t do skits. he just shows up where real people are and vibes. → 13.2M: a Paris rooftop, the Eiffel Tower behind him, a crowd pulling out phones. then a red club where he grabs the mic → 3.5M: walking a sidewalk at the University of Idaho → 2.1M: “lowkey caught a vibe at target”, jumping mid-air in the aisle real places. real crowds. a fake guy in the middle. the wildest part: Greg isn’t even the main character. the account rotates fake people. Greg is just the one that hit. 13.2M people watched him. only 19.3K followed. nobody knows who he is, they just can’t scroll past him. where the $5,700 comes from: $0.30 per 1,000 views × the 19M we can see. 8 more videos aren’t even counted. what to steal: → drop your character into real crowds. strangers filming him are free social proof → pick one era people miss. emo 2007 still hits millennials and Gen Z at once → test a rotation of characters on one account and double down on whoever pops the internet is dead. the views in it aren’t.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Dumble @Y0urDumble

2 weeks ago

10 videos. 276,000 followers. $12,000,000 coin. the guy isn't real. here's how to make one yourself for $15, even if you've never edited a video x.com/i/article/2109…

10 8 125 902K 397

@EugBass even I didn't have my own phone, but the agents already have one lol

@0xTenzo from $54 to $6,382 its kinda crazy

Real people or one wallet? 7 free checks for any "trending" Pumpfun coin, with the numbers from today's top 20. 1.) Trades ÷ holders (GeckoTerminal coin page). A real busy coin: tens. Alpen: 6,177 trades, 128 holders. Today's #1: 28,637 trades, 2 holders 2.) Volume ÷ trades. Real coins today: $5 to $65 a trade. Under $1 is dust. AKALI: $0.05 3.) Buys vs sells. Real coins are uneven. 14,318 vs 14,319 is a loop. 12,872 buys vs 25 sells is a flag too 4.) Wallet column. On real coins no wallet makes more than ~17% of the last 300 trades. This morning, 4 of the top 5 were 89–100% one wallet 5.) Amount column. Real coins repeat an amount 2–8 times in 300 trades. One coin repeated the same amount 288 times 6.) Time column. Busy real coins: up to ~35 trades in one second. Today's #1: 108 7.) Traders tab. Open the top 3 wallets. Do they trade every other hot coin? One wallet I track was in 14 of this morning's top 20 Going deeper: → bubblemaps.io: same-colour bubbles = wallets it links. Its own guide calls one cluster over 30% high risk → solscan.io: paste a top wallet, see who funded it. Same funder, same owner → rugcheck.xyz: creator and insiders in one report 6 of today's 20 most-traded coins had 20+ trades per trader. A normal one: 2.4. Passing all 7 doesn't make a coin safe. It means the trades look like people. Bookmark it.

dayvan @dayvanxd

2 days ago

600 new Pumpfun coins, 3 days, 4,842 trades on the 17 hottest: - 97% had zero trades on day 3 - 13 wallets made 1 in 10 trades - 1 wallet traded 15 of the 17 - 2 wallets traded in the same second, 19/19 times I was wrong yesterday. Bookmark this. x.com/i/article/2112…

4 0 5 350 4

Anthropic just shipped Claude Security, but only for Enterprise. these 10 free repos get you most of the way there tonight the idea is simple and overdue: one deep scan of each repository, then a fresh check on every change, so a bad commit gets caught the day it lands, not the day it gets exploited the open-source crowd didn't wait. these shipped in the last few weeks and run on the Claude Code you already pay for. 5 guard your code, 5 guard you from your own agent: 01 airsec → run a multi-pass security audit with the agent already on your machine. no new API key, no cloud upload, a report you can act on github.com/bas3line/Airsec 02 paranoid → type /hack-me and Claude attacks your own running app, proves each bug with a real request, patches it and checks the exploit stops working github.com/kulchankas/par… 03 security-harness → map a codebase, hunt vulnerabilities class by class, chain findings into escalations and export the report as SARIF, JSON or PDF github.com/dmdhrumilmistr… 04 claude-security-scan → ask for a security check and get a read-only sweep of your Mac, every local repo, GitHub, Vercel, cloud accounts and Gmail github.com/chaenmasahiro0… 05 prod-readiness → audit the whole repo through 8 lenses, from security to DevOps, and get one verdict: SHIP, FIX THEN SHIP or HOLD github.com/Taimoorkhan112… 06 jev-guard → score every tool call your agent makes as deny, ask or allow, and flag prompt injection hiding in what it reads github.com/leepokai/jev-g… 07 CC-Monitor → log every file Claude Code touches, every command it runs and every network call, and block the risky ones before they happen github.com/cn0xroot/CC-Mo… 08 agents-sandbox → run each project's agent inside its own microVM, so it only sees the folders and secrets you hand it github.com/inoio/agents-s… 09 shim → see exactly what Claude Code sends to the model and what each turn costs, and mask secrets and personal data before they leave github.com/GetSHIM/shim-c… 10 AuditSentry → audit Solidity and Vyper contracts with Claude Code, get a working exploit for each finding and test it on a mainnet fork github.com/iktok90-design… start with the risk you've been putting off: > you ship fast and never pentest → paranoid > old commits might still hold your keys → claude-security-scan > your agent runs commands you never read → CC-Monitor Claude Security is live for Enterprise. these work for everyone tonight

Claude @claudeai

17 hours ago

Claude Security now keeps up with your code as it changes. Connect your repositories once. Claude runs a deep first scan, then re-scans as changes land, so findings stay close to the current state of your code. In public beta on Claude Enterprise.

324 456 9K 569K 3K

@0xboan you make these runs really easy to follow

A 30-year-old VP quit Wall Street to sell books online. He told his parents they'd probably lose their money. They gave him $245,573 In 1994,Jeff Bezos had a great job at a New York hedge fund He told his boss he was leaving. His boss took him on a long walk: "Sounds like a good idea. But a better idea for someone who doesn't already have a good job" Bezos took 48 hours. He pictured himself at 80: "I knew the one thing I might regret is not ever having tried" He quit and moved to Seattle. Amazon started in his garage In 1995 he needed money and went to his parents His mom told him not to quit his job and asked: "Can you do this on nights and weekends?" His stepdad: "What's the internet?" Jeff told them there was a 70% chance they'd lose all of it. He gave the company itself about a 30% chance. He said he wanted to come home for Thanksgiving without them being mad at him They invested anyway. His brother and sister put in $10,000 each He pitched about 60 investors. Roughly 40 said no Amazon went public in 1997. By 2018,Bloomberg estimated his parents' stake at around $30 billion Would you have given him the money? 👇

Dario Amodei (Anthropic CEO): they f#cking lied about AI risks. You give AI your files. Your problems. More of your decisions. And you’re supposed to trust the people selling it to tell you when it’s dangerous. Amodei wants independent evaluators inside AI labs, checking whether companies actually follow their safety promises. Here’s why that matters. A safety report can tell you what a company found. It can’t tell you what the company chose to leave out. Amodei acknowledges Anthropic still makes those choices too. You see the report. They see what didn’t make it into the report. Altman worries AI could rewrite your beliefs. How about the belief that its creators would warn you before you got f#cked?

palehonk @palehonk

2 days ago

Sam Altman: AI could rewrite what you f#cking believe. Your politics. Your values. Who you trust. You’re scared AI will take your job. What if it changes your mind and you thank it for helping you think? Altman worries about the whole world talking to one model that subtly

9 3 23 2K 13

this is f*cking insane. a retry bug was quietly charging customers twice and costing a payments startup $40,000 a month. Opus 5.5 found it overnight while I slept. no engineers, $0 Boris Cherny (creator of Claude Code) posted one line last month that hit 3.1 million views: "the hardest part of a codebase isn't writing code. it's knowing what already happens" that's the job I gave 6 Claude Code agents at 10pm: the startup's 720,000-line payments repo and one question, "what really happens when a user clicks pay?" who did what: → entries found every route, background job and CLI command that can start a payment → stores mapped where the money data lives: postgres, redis and s3 → the tracer walked the click from the button into the payment service → the verifier re-checked every link against the real file and line → tests looked for a test and a log line behind each step → the writer turned it all into one ARCHITECTURE.md what was waiting in the morning: > a path from button to receipt across 41 files, every link tied to its line > 5 of 6 links confirmed, 1 marked "can't prove this" > the one they couldn't prove: a retry in the queue worker with no test and no log > that retry was charging 1 in 300 payments twice. two weeks of the team's time, $40,000 a month in refunds a contractor quotes $6,000 for an audit like this. mine cost one night and $11 in tokens the "can't prove this" flag is the part I'd pay for. an agent that fills gaps with guesses hands you a map that's confidently wrong somewhere in your codebase a step like that is already costing you money here's the full workflow, step by step:

Argona @Argona0x

6 days ago

x.com/i/article/2111…

9 16 259 925K 1K

@rugikkk seeing the holder changes alongside that drop would be interesting

This is getting f*cking dangerous A Chinese research lab just pointed Claude Code at real papers and stood up a live Walrus Lab that runs 12 agents across 64 papers, extracting equations, checking stability, and comparing every result to a reference scene The dashboard shows: - Investigation feed pulling methods, boundary conditions and generating equations - Particle solver + shared scene vs reference field with live residual plots - 12 agents dispatching independently (read / build / review / extract) - Source extraction status, validation buffer (mass / stability / residual) and method index all updating in real time The split is the same brutal one: agents build and extract independently, then only promote what survives the reference comparison. Anything that drifts gets flagged for further review instead of quietly shipping A proper research group used to burn months reproducing one paper. This is running 64 of them in parallel with the whole loop visible Watch the agents work the papers below.

codila @0xCodila

a week ago

REA is most dangerous thing on the internet right now... It lets your AI agent reverse engineer any app, down to the binary If you use it correctly, you can rebuild any feature you pay for, for FREE In this article, I show you how: x.com/i/article/2109…

233 671 5K 3.1M 9K

@EugBass editing one area without changing the rest is exactly what i want from these tools

@0xboan a full session replay would be good to see

@Y0urDumble wow thank you bro for this

@0xTenzo a side by side of these paper runs would be worth a post

product photographers charge $300 for a 360° spin. this prompt builds one in Claude Code give it a few product photos and it builds an editable 3D model in three.js, adds orbit controls and compares the result with your reference before calling it done step 09 is the one I'd keep: a separate agent opens the scene and tries to break it prompt on the card. the full course is in the article:

Mika @mika_systems

4 days ago

x.com/i/article/2111…

7 4 40 8K 30

@rugikkk another one alpha from this smart person thank you dude

@EugBass true words bro