"today's hearing is setting a dangerous precedent that if Congress doesn't like what you publish you'll be hauled in before a congressional committee to answer for it...Congress should not be meddling in the peer review process" youtube.com/watch?v=XBmWQJ…
Reminds me of a concern expressed by, coincidentally, former Editor of Science Don Kennedy a few years ago about the idea that the US govt should run science publishing x.com/cshperspective…
Reminds me of a concern expressed by, coincidentally, former Editor of Science Don Kennedy a few years ago about the idea that the US govt should run science publishing x.com/cshperspective…
@cshperspectives Again with the pretension that Covid origins is just another "scientific" problem🤦♂️ In any case, Congress has every right to ask questions so long as the research is supported by taxpayers. Thorp can whine about the "chilling effect" of this inquisition in his editorials.
@cshperspectives @stuartjdneil It's more about what you don't publish.
@cshperspectives If you like your editor, you can keep your editor.