Durbin announced he would a 'no' on Amy Coney Barrett before asking her a single question. Schumer, and a bunch of Democrats, including members of the judiciary committee, did the same-- and never even bothered to meet her.
Durbin announced he would a 'no' on Amy Coney Barrett before asking her a single question. Schumer, and a bunch of Democrats, including members of the judiciary committee, did the same-- and never even bothered to meet her.
Was that in the best interest of the Senate? I'm sure someone asked him. nationalreview.com/news/several-s…
@davidharsanyi Geez, I wonder why. (cough) Merrick Garland
@davidharsanyi Consistency and sincerity were@never their calling card
@davidharsanyi The two cases are completely indistinguishable to me!
@davidharsanyi Because it was a month before an election. She shouldn’t have been nominated
@davidharsanyi Do you remember when the Dem letter rejecting the SCOTUS pick was accidentally emailed to supporters and it was drafted before the nominee was named. It had blanks like “insert name here” in the email. Awesome.
@davidharsanyi @SenatorDurbin What if in your learned opinion the Ketanji Brown Jackson is as ill prepared for service on the bench as Sonia Sotomayor? Are you willing to lead a bipartisan denial for the good of the court?