1/ We knew in 2020 that vac clinical trials were NOT designed to determine whether vac candidates would prevent infection, stop transmission or reduce hosp/mortality. We knew in 2020 that claims of stopping transmission were false based on known science re IgG & IgA Ab responses
1/ We knew in 2020 that vac clinical trials were NOT designed to determine whether vac candidates would prevent infection, stop transmission or reduce hosp/mortality. We knew in 2020 that claims of stopping transmission were false based on known science re IgG & IgA Ab responses
2/ Reminder from 2020…
@dockaurG Yet I asked why @OntHospitalAssn Still has mandates based on Transmission ? As well I asked in their forum if there was any evolutionary Biologist that can confirm the 56 different sexes and the exceptional pace of evolution from Men becoming Women -ALL Politics -no response yet
@dockaurG Dr K, I have always been curious as to why they were even allowed to call this treatment a 'vaccine' because it is not a vaccine by any definition of the term. Perhaps this is why everyone assumed it would prevent both infection and transmission... neither of which it does.
@dockaurG I think it was Pfizer that acknowledged in their initial reports that they did not test for transmission because it was too costly. They disclosed this to govt officials who chose to hide that from the public.