The Cass Review is a methodologically flawed, ideologically led study that isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on. The Labour Party, and Wes Streeting, must stand against the erosion of trans rights and trans healthcare provisions. This is absolutely vital.
The Cass Review is a methodologically flawed, ideologically led study that isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on. The Labour Party, and Wes Streeting, must stand against the erosion of trans rights and trans healthcare provisions. This is absolutely vital.
@e_mmarussell Your pronouns in bio are methodologically flawed
@e_mmarussell No, the Labour Party must stand against the erosion of women’s rights, gay rights and most importantly - stand for the right of a child to grow up without being medically experimented on by gender cultists like you. It’s over Emma SheHer - You lot have done enough damage.
@e_mmarussell Dr Cass is a consultant paediatrician. What qualifications do you have to offer this commentary on her report? The importance of the issues at stake here means that knee jerk reactions must be avoided, and that calm, informed voices are required.
I’m curious. What are your professional qualifications and experience, vs Dr Hilary Cass’? - consultant paediatrician - previous Head of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (2012-2015) - OBE (2015) services to child health - honorary fellowship from the Royal College of Nursing in 2015 On what basis are you asserting that opinion?
@e_mmarussell You didn't even have the time to read, let alone digest this paper before you published your statement. That is pure charlatanery.
@e_mmarussell show your workings. Have you even read it?
@e_mmarussell In what way is it methodologically flawed? Do you think a vulnerable group of children and adults do not deserve the same evidence led medical treatment that the rest of us expect?
@e_mmarussell Waiting to see your point by point analysis that brought you to this conclusion.