🤏🧠: NFTs are bad because of the environmental impact 🌌🧠: NFTs are bad because they glorify possession and consumption of nothing, exclusivity without meaning, receipts over creation, resale over appreciation. they devalue art and funnel money to those who already have it
i think some folks are interpreting this as saying the environmental impact doesn't matter? sorry, maybe this was a poor choice of format it super does, but there's a chance it'll be fixed one day, but NFTs would /still/ suck ass, so i don't want that to be the only criticism
@eevee Why are you so much against artists owning the means of their production? Especially when we haven't abolished the private property whatsoever elsewhere.
@eevee @lucas_bourdon NFTs are not jpegs, its a technology with very broad applications.
@eevee @PerthshireMags eh that's already what the art market is to be honest, it's not a big hop skip and a jump away. it's what art trading deserves.
@eevee you mean like selling art in the first place? this aint it. an nft is indistinguishable from selling an irl painting