Email suggests Fauci was involved in some kind of "damage control" related to EcoHealth Alliance in April 2020. Top aide to Fauci relays rumor to EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak that Fauci was doing damage control related to his grant. The "Lauer letter" likely refers to a letter from NIH Deputy Director for Extramural Research Michael Lauer to EcoHealth seeking more information about the group's work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology as a condition of the continuation of its NIH funding. h/t email maven @Rebecca21951651 ecohealthalliance.org/2024/04/ecohea… wsj.com/articles/nih-p…
In response to a news article about the Lauer letter, NIH Director Francis Collins wrote an email referring to EcoHealth's connection to Wuhan as "one of the most difficult and wrenching situations of my 11 years as director." x.com/jamesctobias/s…
In response to a news article about the Lauer letter, NIH Director Francis Collins wrote an email referring to EcoHealth's connection to Wuhan as "one of the most difficult and wrenching situations of my 11 years as director." x.com/jamesctobias/s… https://t.co/fMytKHfLHF
@emilyakopp "15,000 samples in freezers in Wuhan, and could do the full genomes of the 700+ CoVs we've identified"
@emilyakopp "hope this situation can be resolved with minimal damage" writes David Morens to Peter Daszak. Presumably, he's only concerned with those involved in creating the COVID-19 pandemic getting caught, not the pandemic spreading. He misspells Negra Modelo, a dark lager.
@emilyakopp @BlackTomThePyr8 Do you already have this document?
Emily, do you have pinned or highlighted posts that convey what changes you recommend for the health system? Here are mine, 5 simple but I believe dramatically effective changes. From my Substack article. 1. Make it illegal for pharmaceutical companies to advertise or sponsor or gift to any medical institution, health insurance company, individual scientists (not hired by same) or any medical journal, social media network, TV, magazine, newspaper (paper or electronic). If this requires a new constitutional amendment, I'm sure an enraged public will get it passed. In the interim, have the FDA restore it's pre-1977 rule on pharmaceutical company presence in advertisement media prior to 1997 (see drmichaelwayne.com/blog/drug-ads-… ). 2. Abolish the FDA, NIH (Fauci's department is part of NIH), and CDC, allow the 50 states (and DC plus US Territories) to decide how they want to do similar functions, whether as an individual state or as a member of a group of states, the obvious reaction will be that there will be a dominant blue-state approach, a dominant red-state approach, and a dominant mix-match approach. I would agree to a minimal federal law requirement. Nobody can sell a drug or medical device that is not insured for liability protection (remove vaccine liability protection first). Liability insurance company underwriting testing labs would end up being setup to evaluate the risk of a new drug seeking liability protection then. Better to have competing safety certifying labs, so customers over time learn which testing labs do a better job. The counterpoint that many vaccines would not be produced is that (a) only bad vaccines would be stopped (good), (b) mandatory vaccine mandates would not be workable (of course, since one has abolished the FDA, NIH and CDC), and (c) vaccines would become voluntary and possibly more expensive but perhaps coverable under medical insurance. 3. Stop taxpayer funding of medical research, instead provide the incentives via a double-value or triple-value tax deduction approach for individual taxpayers to fund competing medical grant financial foundations. A double-value tax deduction, means a $1 given allows the individual to record on their taxes they donated $2. 4. Have the Congress pass these laws on a non-recorded vote so that their pharmaceutical overlords can't see how individual legislators voted (it's a simple procedural rule to allow bill passage by aye-nay voices). 5. Recommend individual states to abolish the DECERTIFICATION practices of individual medical licensing boards and pharmacy licensing boards; replace the decertification process by the use of civil law suits that require a trial by jury. For more, please follow. I have another article detailing item 3 above. The above is from my Substack article: Five, Simple, Dramatic Changes for the USA in a Sane Post-Pandemic World open.substack.com/pub/postpandem…
@emilyakopp How neatly they document what they didn't tell Fauci. How convenient.