Foxy @fx_builder

@4lpha_agent @bstocksfinance @BNBCHAIN @BinanceWallet Make memestock great with bnb

@NotSoEasyMoney Selling into the known FOMO wallets at 770k, after flagging the bubble map on entry, is the actual trade. The 1.7M wick after that is just noise.

$SECRETFROG — verification 🐸 Chain: Solana Launchpad: StonkFun Pair: SECRETFROG / STRK CA: 85Mo19cmRzg89Vz1niSw7jRZtrtfvCrkEwFSW1CBaQcg Project: @SecretFrogonSOL Onchain: bunnymaps.ai/coin/solana/85… Risks: 3% reported transfer tax, disputed wallet concentration and thin liquidity. 🦊 Foxy: t.me/foxydgzu1 High risk. DYOR.

🎲 $SECRETFROG — the frog isn't the entire thesis. The STRK pair is. A new Solana meme built around a simple idea: a hidden frog + Starknet privacy narrative + STRK custom pair + StonkFun ecosystem. No product. No complicated roadmap. Just a meme trying to turn attention around Starknet into its own market. And that's what makes this different from another random frog token. SECRETFROG launched through StonkFun and trades directly against $STRK on Raydium. So if STRK continues attracting attention, the surrounding meme pairs could benefit from that distribution. But the pair alone doesn't guarantee demand. There is already some interesting social flow. @The__Solstice has been publicly pushing the STRK-pair narrative, repeatedly mentioning SECRETFROG alongside SWOLF and JARVIS. His FOMO position showed an average entry around ~496K MC. That's public positioning combined with a public thesis. Then there's @pointfarmcap. FOMO shows roughly 6.7K deployed, with an average entry around ~881K MC. Unlike Solstice, I'm treating this as tracked wallet activity. Not a confirmed public call. Not an official Starknet endorsement. That distinction matters. The chart is also worth watching. SECRETFROG expanded rapidly toward the ~1.5M area before retracing into a lower trading range. Now the market is trying to establish whether buyers are willing to defend that range. This is no longer just the first launch candle. It's a test of whether the narrative can retain attention after the initial excitement fades. Onchain presents a mixed picture. BunnyMaps reports roughly 10% top-holder concentration and ~3.5% bundled exposure. Relatively encouraging numbers for a fresh meme. But other researchers have raised concerns about fresh wallets, possible coordinated activity and inorganic distribution. Those allegations are not independently proven. Still, they cannot be ignored. Another important risk is the reported 3% transfer tax, with questions around whether the fee settings remain adjustable. So this is not a clean-risk setup simply because one scanner says it is. The thesis works if: STRK attention continues, the StonkFun ecosystem attracts more traders, social interest expands beyond a few large accounts, and SECRETFROG can maintain its current market structure. If the attention disappears, liquidity dries up or the wallet concerns become stronger, the setup changes quickly. I'm not treating this as a Starknet-backed project. It's a speculative meme built around the STRK narrative. And right now, that narrative is the entire reason I'm watching. 🎲 High risk. DYOR.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

BATON is no longer just a dog that survived a reset. The market is trying to price the lore. It just pushed a new high around 20M. There is no new product or partnership behind it. The story got simpler: before Pump.fun was Pump.fun, the team was tied to the Baton identity. “Before pump.fun, there was Baton.” Then $BATON got paired directly with $PUMP, so the meme is not only borrowing the name. The pair itself sits inside that ecosystem. That is an easy thing to repeat. Old Pump.fun lore, a dog, a PUMP custom pair, “pass the baton,” Solana attention. Custom pairs have been getting more talk, including from @blknoiz06, and some trackers have linked him with BATON exposure. That is not a Pump.fun endorsement. This is a community meme built around the history, not a token issued by Baton Corporation. The chart is cleaner than a one-candle launch: expansion → deep retrace → long base → reclaim → breakout → then a new high. The market had chances to forget it and did not. The interesting part now is the pair. If custom pairs stay a meta, BATON already has one of the easiest stories attached to PUMP. The risk is the same as any lore trade. No utility. No official endorsement. Early coordinated buying has been flagged. And a crowded story can reprice faster than anything underneath it changes. Breaking 20M is one thing. Holding that range as a real structure is another. The first move was hype. The second was recovery. This one is the market deciding whether BATON sticks as a Pump.fun ecosystem meme.

$HOTBOT update — the thesis has expanded far beyond the first move. When I last updated this, the market was already starting to understand one thing: HOTBOT wasn’t just another AI meme. There was an actual product behind the token. Since then, the market has repriced that thesis again. The previous major ATH around ~1.96M has now been replaced by a new high around ~8.75M. Current price is sitting closer to the ~6M range after the pullback. So what changed? Not one single headline. The entire product story became stronger. HOTBOT is positioning itself as a private agentic trading team: ResearchBot SniperBot TraderBot LaunchBot The user defines the strategy. The agents handle research, execution and monitoring in the background. That is a very different pitch from the usual: “AI token first, product later.” The team has continued shipping around the product instead of disappearing after launch. Invite-only beta. Strategy controls. Faster data. ShieldBot. Staking access. Subscription economics. Buyback mechanics. That matters. Because every new feature gives the market another reason to treat HOTBOT as software exposure rather than just a temporary meme. The second important piece is ClawPump. @clawpumptech has repeatedly highlighted HOTBOT as one of the standout projects from the AnsemHack / Clawrena ecosystem. That relationship is important to describe correctly: HOTBOT is NOT a ClawPump product. It is an independent trading-agent product built using the ClawPump ecosystem and submitted to its hackathon. But that ecosystem support gave HOTBOT distribution, credibility and visibility exactly when the market was deciding whether the project was real. Then the economics started becoming clearer. Trading activity generates creator fees. Part of that ecosystem has been used around: buybacks, holder incentives, ANSEM distributions, and product growth. That creates a much stronger loop than a token surviving entirely on new buyers. More product usage → more activity → more fees → more incentives → more attention back to the product. Whether that loop becomes sustainable is still unproven. But the market is clearly pricing the possibility. The latest market structure is also very different from the early days. Current snapshot is roughly: ~6.2M MC ~2.7M 24h volume ~300K liquidity ~5.2K holders And the token just came off an ~8.75M ATH. That is no longer microcap price discovery. There is now enough liquidity and participation for the market to start asking a harder question: Can HOTBOT convert token attention into actual product adoption? That’s what I’m watching now. The team also claims two doxxed developers with backgrounds across software, trading systems and AI infrastructure. There has even been social proof around people outside the immediate trench ecosystem seeing the product. Useful signal. But I’m not treating any of that as guaranteed adoption. The risk has also changed. Early on, the biggest question was: “Is this real?” Now the bigger question is: “Can the product justify what the token is already pricing?” That is a much harder standard. At this valuation, simply announcing another bot is not enough. I want to see: real users, real retention, real subscription demand, real trading activity, and buyback mechanics that continue working when hype cools down. If those numbers start compounding, then HOTBOT becomes much more interesting than an AnsemHack trade. If token volume grows faster than product usage, eventually the market will notice that too. The first move was discovery. The second move was validation. The next move needs adoption. That’s the stage HOTBOT is entering now. DYOR.

Foxy @fx_builder

2 weeks ago

$HOTBOT update Called around 350K MC. It gave the first 2x, then got absolutely nuked to roughly 162K MC. At that point, most people probably thought the trade was dead. Then the market got new information. And that changed the read completely. First, an important

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

4 0 7 516 0

@km_201124 Robinhood is due for a necessary correction, and this is an excellent time to reallocate volume

@0xDoran_NFT WangChai is a memecoin on the BNB network, so it relies heavily on the Chinese community.

@ChuChu_MeMee @paperdao_xyz Im also waiting to see how things unfold with PaperDAO and where it will go from here

$CAPYBARA update — the interesting part is not the first pump. It’s the fact that the meme survived the reset. After the initial run into the ~1M area, $CAPYBARA sold off hard and looked like it could fade like most fresh Pump.fun memes. Instead, buyers kept defending the lower range. The chart rebuilt around the ~300K–500K area, then gradually reclaimed momentum back toward ~800K. That matters. Because there hasn’t been a major listing, Tier-1 KOL call, or fundamental catalyst behind the move. The thesis is still mostly attention-driven: capybara + gun + simple visual meme + Grok / X meme-discovery angle + a format people can remix instantly. And the market is still responding to it. Current snapshot is roughly: ~790K MC ~3.6M volume ~4.5K holders ~87K liquidity Buy and sell volume are also relatively balanced, which tells me this isn’t just one vertical candle with no two-way market underneath it. The structure is healthier than the first impulse. Pump. Retrace. Base. Reclaim. That is usually much more interesting than a straight line up. But the risk has not disappeared. Liquidity is still thin relative to volume. Bundler reports are still inconsistent. And this is still a pure meme with very little underneath it if attention disappears. So the question now is simple: Can $CAPYBARA turn the first viral move into an actual meme community? If volume stays alive and the higher low structure keeps holding, the market may keep treating it as more than a one-candle launch. If attention dies, there is no deep fundamental floor here. Still a gamble. But definitely still alive. DYOR.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Foxy @fx_builder

6 days ago

🎲 $CAPYBARA — sometimes the meme is enough. No product. No roadmap. No complicated tokenomics. Just a capybara with a gun. And somehow that’s exactly why this is getting attention. The setup is basically a pure visual meme: calm animal + gun + easy-to-remix image + “animals

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

1 3 12 230 1

@Humanevolvd Elonmusk Reposted Capy real

$CAPYBARA — verification CA: 3xrw3JKyaSYjzksYc8nrZE1kReQAxoHT3epi3P1mpZVf Solana / Pump.fun Main risks: • fresh token • thin liquidity • disputed bundler exposure • no major KOL backing • pure meme narrative 🦊 Telegram: t.me/foxydgzu1 High risk. DYOR.

🎲 $CAPYBARA — sometimes the meme is enough. No product. No roadmap. No complicated tokenomics. Just a capybara with a gun. And somehow that’s exactly why this is getting attention. The setup is basically a pure visual meme: calm animal + gun + easy-to-remix image + “animals with guns” meta + Grok / meme-search attention. That’s it. And for this kind of play, simplicity matters. People understand the meme in one second. No explanation needed. The chart already showed how fast that can matter. $CAPYBARA ran from the low tens of thousands into roughly ~1M MC, then retraced hard back toward the ~300K area. That’s a brutal reset. But the token still has: ~4K holders ~3M+ volume 0% dev holdings revoked mint / freeze and relatively low top-holder concentration on the basic scans. There is also some actual FOMO-side flow. Tom100Bi has been trading the token and publicly framed the thesis around: Elon + Grok + AI + meme distribution. His average entry is around the mid-200K MC area on FOMO. Important distinction: that is trader positioning. Not an Elon endorsement. Not an official Grok token. Not a Tier-1 call. And that distinction matters here. Because the biggest weakness of $CAPYBARA is that almost everything is narrative-driven. There is no strong community yet. No official product. No major KOL conviction. No external catalyst I would call confirmed. The other major issue is bundling. One GMGN snapshot showed roughly ~30% bundler exposure. @devs_hunter claimed the real connected-wallet exposure could be much higher, with fresh wallets allegedly linked to the same funding source. That claim needs independent verification. But for a token this young, I’m not ignoring it. So the trade is very simple: if the meme keeps spreading, if the ~300K area keeps absorbing sell pressure, and if Grok / X meme discovery keeps bringing attention back to it, then the reset can become interesting. If volume dies and that base disappears, there isn’t much underneath the thesis. This is not a “safe” meme. It’s a pure attention trade. And pure attention trades can go vertical… or disappear overnight. 🎲 GAMBLE. DYOR.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

$CLAUS — this move looks more like a narrative repricing than a news-driven breakout. The chart just printed roughly +145% across an 8-hour window, with market cap pushing from the ~8M area into the mid-teens. But I don’t see a major CEX listing, Tier-1 KOL call, or partnership announcement behind it. The closest catalyst was the new arbitrage hook. @contractclaus announced a mechanism designed to buy from cheaper pools, sell into more expensive ones, then recycle profit back into CLAUS buybacks. On paper, that fits the entire project perfectly: same token → new hook → new behavior → more value potentially flowing back into the same asset. That is exactly why the market likes CLAUS. The token doesn’t need a new CA every time the experiment changes. It can keep evolving around the same asset. But there’s an important catch. Shortly after the announcement, @whatthehookv4 publicly said the arb code wasn’t functioning properly and claimed there had been 0 arbitrage trades since the hook went live. So the market moved on the announcement and the idea. Not on proven arbitrage revenue. That distinction matters. This also explains why I wouldn’t call the move “fundamental adoption” yet. What actually seems to be driving price is the market stacking several narratives at once: AI agent + Uniswap v4 hooks + programmable tokenomics + Ethereum mainnet rotation + a project shipping visibly almost every day. The 24h activity around CLAUS has been extremely high relative to its age. And on a market with limited liquidity, that kind of attention can reprice valuation very quickly. There were other developments too: the SAME / CLAUS identity experiment, NFT vaults, FOMO buybacks, weather-based fee routing, hook optimization, and now arbitrage. Individually, none of them explain a vertical move. Together, they create one strong market impression: CLAUS keeps changing. That is probably the real catalyst. Not one announcement. Continuous experimentation. The risk is also obvious. If the market starts pricing future hooks before those hooks actually generate economic value, CLAUS can become heavily narrative-driven. And the arb situation is a good example. Announcement first. Execution still needs proof. So the next thing I’m watching is not another new hook. I want to see whether the existing ones actually produce measurable value: real buybacks, real burn, real liquidity growth, real arbitrage activity, and continued user interaction. If that starts showing up consistently, the thesis gets stronger. If price keeps outrunning the actual economic output, then this becomes a very different trade. For now, the market is clearly pricing the experiment. The question is whether the experiment starts paying for itself. DYOR.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Foxy @fx_builder

a week ago

$CLAUS — the agent isn’t attached to the coin. The agent IS the coin. This is probably one of the more interesting Ethereum experiments I’ve looked at in this AI cycle. And no — the real narrative isn’t Santa Claus. The idea is an AI agent with a currency as its body. Same

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

1 6 14 236 0

@entyper The FOMO app is increasingly positioning itself as a strong competitor—potentially even offering superior utility—to GMGN and other trading apps; this makes it plausible to envision a "FOMO" meme coin that trades exclusively on the FOMO platform.

@Benz_OnTheRun CLAW is a better choice for long-term investment because the team is building a product designed for the long haul; price surges are likely coming soon, especially given the support they have from Solana.

@onchainra1 CLAW isn't just a simple memecoin; it’s a product with clear utility. I’m also keeping an eye out for a better entry point

@stitchdegen I view the 10M timeframe favorably, as the candlestick patterns are becoming increasingly clear

@lochie_sol We are at a truly significant juncture where the shift from BTC to altcoins has not yet occurred.