Every day is a good day for @MichaelWorobey to retract his Science paper. Unless obviously he can tell us how China selected the 100 confirmed cases with 2019 onset it presented to the WHO, out of the 165 that were actually present in the official CDC database at end Feb 2020.
All details, plus links to peer-reviewed papers from top Chinese teams having privileged access to the official Chinese CDC database, showing 247 to 260 Dec 2019 onset cases there:
All details, plus links to peer-reviewed papers from top Chinese teams having privileged access to the official Chinese CDC database, showing 247 to 260 Dec 2019 onset cases there:
@gdemaneuf @MichaelWorobey And you really think that the peer review and editorial review process at Science, one of THE top journals, would have missed this? Don't tell me - they are all in on it as well, right? And how about some actual data FOR a lab leak? Still none?
@gdemaneuf @MichaelWorobey I also look forward to learning more about why his 737 Weibo cases looks different than mine. Or theirs. Or theirs. @WashburneAlex @danwalker9999
@gdemaneuf @MichaelWorobey This assumes that there were no false positive diagnosis or double counting during the early part of an epidemic when the cause of the pneumonia wasn't even known! You're obviously just assuming accuracy of the largest possible number assuming a conspiracy.