JAY STORM @jaystorm2016

When the Muslim population in a country is less than 2%, they are a peace-loving minority that poses no threat to other ethnic groups. United States 1.1%, China 1.8% for example. When the Muslim population is 2-5%, they begin to push for government authorization to enforce Islamic law in Muslim enclaves, recruiting new members from prisons and the streets, with disturbances occurring in Muslim enclaves. Such countries include: Australia 3.2%, Canada 4.9%, Italy 4.8%. Denmark 5.4%, Germany 6.7%, United Kingdom 6%, Spain 5.3%, Thailand 5.4% When the Muslim population reaches 5-10%, major disturbances erupt in Muslim enclaves; they advocate for the introduction of halal foods, ensuring that halal food practitioners are Muslims; they pressure chain supermarkets to label shelves with halal certifications, threatening those who refuse to comply. Such countries include: Denmark 5.4%, Germany 6.7%, United Kingdom 6%, Spain 5.3%, Thailand 5.4%, Philippines 5%, Sweden 7.1%, Switzerland 5.9%, Netherlands 5.5%. When the Muslim population approaches 10-20%, nationwide riots occur; Muslims issue a series of demands, such as building large mosques in enclaves, granting super-national and super-legal privileges, forcing non-Muslims to follow Muslim customs, and criminalizing "expressions of dissatisfaction with Islam." Such countries include: France 10.8%, India 14.6%, Israel 18.4%, Russia 13%. When the Muslim population is 20-60%, jihadist militants sporadically massacre non-believers, burning down Christian and Jewish places of worship; other ethnic groups either convert to Islam out of fear of being killed or are killed by Muslims; the country experiences massacres and ongoing terrorist attacks. Such countries include: Ethiopia 33%, Bosnia 50.7%, Chad 55%. When the Muslim population reaches 60-80%, Islamic law replaces secular law, establishing a theocratic regime that persecutes all other non-believers in the name of the state, massacres Christians, and imposes taxes on non-believers using Islamic law as a weapon. Such countries include: Lebanon 67.8, Albania 60%, Malaysia 63%, Qatar 77.5% (Qatari citizen 100%). When the Muslim population is 80%-98%, the country lives in daily intimidation, violence, and jihad, carrying out ethnic cleansing and massacres, with the state expelling non-believers. Such countries include: Sudan 96.6%, Bangladesh 90%, Egypt 93%, Indonesia 87%, Iraq 99.6%, Pakistan 97%, Palestine 98%, Syria 90%, Turkey 94%. When the Muslim population is 98 to 100%, the Islamic people welcome the "House of Islamic Peace." In theory, this should be a time of peace, as everyone is Muslim, living in harmony without internal strife—but in reality, it is nothing like that; peace is not achieved, because in 100% purely Islamic countries, Muslim groups of different sects attack each other, vie to become the leaders of domestic Islamic law, and seek to eliminate other Muslim factions for all sorts of reasons. Such countries include: When the Muslim population is 80%-99%, the country lives in daily intimidation, violence, and jihad, carrying out ethnic cleansing and massacres, with the state expelling non-believers. Such countries include: , Afghanistan 100%, Somalia 99.6%, Yemen 100%. Maldives 99%, Mauritania 99.6%, Morocco 99%, Niger 98.2%, Iran 99.5%

Official figures out this morning report that last month, the UK government borrowed £24.5 billion. But the fineprint shows that almost £11 billion of that extra borrowing went on debt interest payments. That's more than £400 per household on debt service costs, in September alone. So far during this financial year, from April to September, the government's debt interest payments amount to £61 billion. Now, this number will barely feature in UK newspapers and across our airwaves. It may be mentioned in passing in out-of-the-way business sections, or on the odd business bulletin. But this huge debt interest bill won't register with the vast majority of our political and media class, or impact the national debate. Let me explain why that's so wrong and so dangerous ... £61 billion is a massive amount of money. It's equivalent to the UK's entire annual defence budget – the money we're paying, increasingly to foreign creditors, simply to service our national debt for six months, not to pay any of it back. £61 billion is equivalent to the money you'd raise over a year from adding a whopping 7 pence to the basic rate of income tax. For £61 billion, you could build around 40 large, state-of-the-art hospitals, or employ more than 100 thousand extra nurses for ten years. £61 billion would pay for free-at-the-point of use social care for everyone who needs it in the UK, for an entire year – three times over. Again, this is the debt interest bill on Britain's spiralling national debt – now more than 3 trillion pounds – over the last six months alone. The UK's public finances are close to meltdown – yet so many MPs and journalists continue blithely to view ever more public spending and borrowing as the answer to every problem. Those who highlight the dangers post by our hugely precarious national accounts are dismissed as cranks, ideologues or worse. But basic arithmetic has no ideology. And there is nothing "progressive" or "kind" or "right-on" about driving the UK ever closer to the fiscal cliff edge, provoking a crisis that will make the "austerity" years of the 2010s feel like a picnic, a crisis in which poorer households will suffer the most. Yes, Britain's national debt is lower than that of France. But because our borrowing has been rising so sharply, and because we're so prone to inflation, our debt service costs are much higher. The UK is spending a disgraceful 3.6pc of GDP on public debt interest, while France spends less than 2.5pc. Endless airtime and column inches are devoted to spurious conversations about a billion or two of additional "fiscal headroom" we may or may not have in three years' time. And, of course, any "extra headroom" is immediately pledged in new spending – which means yet more borrowing. These conversations are a waste of time – and, in fact, are deeply counterproductive. Three-year fiscal forecasts, even one- and two-year forecasts, routinely turn out to be askew by tens of billions of pounds. I'm not saying we don't need fiscal rules - we do, but we need more immediate rules, which actually bite, acting as a meaningful constraint on out-of-control borrowing and spending. Instead, political and media sages present the nation with spuriously precise discussions about fictional fiscal outcomes way into the future – using rules which are deliberately designed to kick arithmetic realities into the long grass .... An increasingly expensive, over-bearing, out of control state is not the answer to Britain problems. But unless we change course, it will certainly be our downfall. Please like/share if you think what I'm saying is important – and if fiscal realities should feature more prominently in our national debate. And for more sharp, plain-speaking economic analysis subscribe to: "When The Facts Change - economic and politics in a fast-moving world, with Liam Halligan"

@TonyClimate Result, stasis.

@ScienceAlert Legal bs obscures access to this post

@ABridgen Gobshite

Sorry Folks. Another mega-rant from my goodself. Here I am, a lone 70 year old pensioner, who contrary to the notion spread by MPs and political pundits not rich. I don't own my own home worth millions and live the life of luxury, because I'm a baby 'boomer'. I live from week to week on a state pension and that's it. I've worked my entire life and rarely had occasion to claim benefits. Only when I've been between jobs. Even then, I've got off my arse and got a job. Any job, even menial jobs to earn a crust, until I could find a job in my field of expertise. I even worked way past my retirement date, as a favour to the boss I worked for. No, I'm not looking for sympathy. I'm just stating how it is. This is why I despair at this country (UK) and how it has been railroaded on a path to a place I simply don't recognise any more. It's not the country I grew up in. It has changed beyond recognition. Purely and simply because the Governments of all colours over many decades have 'engineered' a country swamped by illegal and legal immigrants. It continues this relentless path to population exchange. Cheap labour to undercut the indigenous white people. Call me racist, if you must. But deny this is happening? You can't. When I was more able (housebound now), I would visit my local high street, and wander around the shops and market, and buy groceries and shopping of one sort or another. All very leisurely. Now? You have to sneak about with hopefully some degree of invisibility. Dare not wear a watch or anything valuable. Don't use a mobile phone, or if you do, hide in a doorway, and make the call brief. All for fear of being targeted by gangs of immigrants, loafing about, looking for their next 'victim'. Admit it or not, that is how a significant proportion of people live these days. I know it's a much vaunted phrase, but it's like living in the third world. It's actively been engineered and continues. In fact gets worse by the day. Now, we have the debacle in Gosport. Where the police invoked a special order to effectively lock down the entire town. Laid on luxury coaches, commandeered a dozen or so ambulances, and provided motorcycle outriders to 'escort' the most recent influx of illegal migrants to God knows where. The police provided more security than they would to a visiting dignitary. A great big welcome to illegal invaders. Is it any wonder true Brits are spitting feathers, knowing Brits are footing the bill for this kind of exclusive treatment. As I hurtle along my twilight years, I can only feel a growing despair at what I'll be leaving this in place of this once great country. A third world shit-hole, entirely engineered by politicians.

@andyburnham The practical way to actually help people: - scrap Net Zero - approve domestic oil & gas production - build nuclear power plants

I am an atheist, but I listen with intent to this young woman's words. in 1945 the world's biggest religion was christianity. Now the followers of Islam are 500% more than the followers of Christianity; 2 billion vs just 400 million. This rapid change is a relatively short period of time is clearly catastrophic for the survival of Western society.

Who comes first in Pakistan? Pakistanis. 
Who comes first in China? The Chinese. 
Who comes first in Iraq? Iraqis. Who comes first in Russia? Russians. 
Who comes first in the UK? EVERYONE except the natives. Diversity is killing our country.

The police operation around Gosport is impressive in its scale and organisation. What it proves is that, when it comes to its own priorities, the government can be ruthlessly competent. Incompetence is a policy choice.

The only desirable migrants have all left for Monaco and in their place we have a thriving demand for genetic disorder doctors , motability showrooms and world class sex offenders. Sounds like a nation that's been busy building its funeral pyre for 30 years.

💯💯💯💯💯 The Muslims see the Lefty's as USEFUL IDIOTS.

That’s the problem

300 Guns @300_guns

3 weeks ago

86 2K 17K 560K 786

@Real_JFKK In Saudi Arabia and in most Muslim countries that practice Sharia law, Pork is banned Alcoholic beer and wine are banned Non-Muslim churches are banned Not wearing a burqa / niqab / hijab are not allowed Non Muslim Arabs are second class citizens Kick these Islamists out.

Muslim parents "demanded" a ban on pork at a school in a city in the Netherlands. The mayor of that place responded with wise words! "Muslims must understand that they must adapt to the Netherlands, their customs, their traditions, their way of life, because it was the country they chose to emigrate to. They must understand that they are the ones who must integrate and learn to live in the Netherlands. They must understand that they are the ones who must change their lifestyle, not the Dutch. You must understand that the Dutch are not racist or xenophobic. We accept many immigrants, from many countries with different cultures and religions, which are Islamic countries that do not accept non Islamic immigrants. Therefore, the Dutch are not willing to give up their identity and their culture. In conclusion, they must understand that in the Netherlands, with their Jewish Christian roots, Christmas trees, churches, and religious parties, the religion must remain in the Netherlands. For Muslims who disagree with the Dutch culture and religion and do not feel comfortable in the Netherlands, there are 57 beautiful Muslim countries around the world, most of them populated and ready to receive them with open arms, according to the sharia. If you leave your country to come to the Netherlands, and not to a Muslim country, it is because you have seen a better life in the Netherlands than where you come from. THIS IS THE WAY TO TREAT PEOPLE COMING IN THAT ARE THEIR TO DESTROY OUR COUNTRIES! IF YOU DONT LIKE IT? GO HOME!

Why aren’t the “good” Muslims telling the “bad” Muslims to stop?

You want to start a race war? Good job, UK. This is exactly how you start one.