Martin Kotlář @knitram

Toto vlákno naplno ukazuje, že tento národ je nevratně vymytý dezinfem. - Starostové a minulá vláda je vykreslována jako vítačská, přitom nepřijala jediného ekonomického migranta. Nynější "protimigrační" vláda s SPD přitom zvyšuje kvóty na ekonomické migranty z Filipín a dalších vzdálených kultur. - Byl to Rakušan, kdo přinesl jeden z nejpřísnějších azylových zákonů v Evropě, nebyl to Okamura, ani Babiš. Ti teď naopak jsou nasraní, protože nemají kam zpřísňovat. - Migrační pakt většina vymytých v ČR vnímá jako pakt pro migraci. Přitom promigrační aktivisté a neziskovky byli silně proti němu a nenávidí ho, považují jej za fašistický atd. Proč? Protože přinesl snažší vyhošťování, nové podmínky detence a konečně i to financování zasažených zemí k obraně hranic. Že to je financováno skrze to, že si buď vezmeme legála, nebo pošleme prachy právě na tu ochranu, nebo jako třetí možnost pošleme pohraničníky? To je ten kompromis, ale nedělá z toho pakt promigrační. - Migrační pakt už běží, počty ilegálů, co se dostávají do EU klesly. - Kdo žije z migrace? Nejvíce ji využívají strany, co podporují ruSSáky, tedy zemi s obřím podílem muslimů, zločinů, vražd, kde Putin otevírá obří mešity, líbá Korán a muslimové pořádají modlení v ulicích... - Kdo podporuje migraci? Rusáci cpali roky migranty do Polska přes Bělorusko, nyní to opakují přes Pobaltí. Hlídají trasy v africe, vydělávají na převaděčství a migranty organizují. Takže je fakt neskutečná píčovina volit proruské strany, aby "migraci řešily", když jejich země zaslíbená je sem zároveň lifruje.

Jura Háček 🇨🇿🇪🇺🇺🇦 (jirka maso :) @jura_haczek

7 days ago

Ok, takže koho mám příště volit, abych nikdy nemusel koukat na záběry, jak u nás běhá podobná svoloč po Staromáku a rabuje v Pařížský stejně, jako se děje teď v Miláně? (dezostrany nepočítám)

344 50 1K 106K 69

As France is burning, I keep thinking of what the UAE Foreign Minister said a few years ago 👇 He accurately predicted this.

@jefferinc @BohdanKrotevych They are paying for the services. It is not cheap.

@ne_vluchiv @BohdanKrotevych Let's hope

Piráti VYHRÁLI spor s Čeprem, který dlouho tvrdohlavě odmítal poskytnout informace o tom, jaký objem zakázek zadal bez soutěže (z ruky) Agrofertu. Je to šílená částka, což byl taky důvod, proč to Čepro utajovalo. 19 miliard pro Babiše bez výběrového řízení, přikryté antimonopolním úřadem a neřešené bývalým ministrem za ODS Zbyňkem Stanjurou. Soutěžení, které jsme požadovali Stanjura odmítl, připravenou změnu na Antimonopolním úřadě a nový zákon, který jsem s odborníky připravil, narazil u tria Kupka, Stanjura, Blažek a u jejich kamaráda z vlády (2012-2013: Petr Mlsna, Petr Nečas, Petr Fiala, Pavel Blažek, Zbyněk Stanjura, Martin Kuba, Petr Bendl, Tomáš Chalupa), šéfa antimonopolního úřadu dosazeného bez řádného výberka duem Babiš - Zeman. Tolik k tržnímu prostředí a férové soutěži v ČR. Doporučuji pořad z té doby “Noty od Mlsny” a asi si před tim dát kouda černého uhlí. 🙈 ceskatelevize.cz/porady/1142743…

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Shocking unreleased footage of CCP violent crackdown on the peaceful student protesters in Tiananmen Square on 6/4, 1989, has finally been revealed. It was sealed by British ITN. Estimated 10k students were killed. @DSA should learn from this massacre!

@AlesZelinka555 @JSedlarik My jsme tam byli na jídle kvůli tomu dobrému hodnocení, ale jídlo nás dost zklamalo. Kolega v práci chodí s Írankou a ta je taky nehodnotila pozitivně . Škoda. Nicméně šafránový čaj mají dobrý .

University debate, "Were humans built to eat meat?", same two chairs, same clock. Vegan: "Anatomically we're closer to the gorilla than the lion. Flat molars, long gut. A gentle plant-eater with delusions." Paleoanthropologist: "Then explain the acid." Vegan: "Which acid?" Paleoanthropologist: "Your stomach runs at a pH of about 1.5. A lion's sits nearer 3.6. Yours is stronger than the animal you've just been contrasted with, by a factor of about a hundred." Vegan: "Stomach acid digests food." Paleoanthropologist: "A cow's rumen sits at about 6.5. That's a compost heap with a pulse. Yours strips the zinc off a coin. Why would a gentle plant-eater carry that?" Vegan: "Protection." Paleoanthropologist: "From what? Lettuce doesn't fight back." Vegan: "Bacteria." Paleoanthropologist: "Which bacteria live in a leaf at a level that needs a pH of 1.5? Name the salad." Vegan: "..." Paleoanthropologist: "The animals that run acid as low as ours are the scavengers. Vultures. Things that arrive at a carcass on the second day and need to kill what's already living in it. We're not built like the lion. We're built like the bird that waits for the lion to finish." Vegan: "Flattering." Paleoanthropologist: "It's a picture of a species with a rock, a sharp flake and no claws. You don't get the fresh kill. You get the femur nobody could open, forty hours late, and you'd better have the acid for it." Vegan: "Acid that strong is dangerous. Look how many people are on tablets for it." Paleoanthropologist: "The only animal on earth that pays to switch its stomach off. You've spent sixty years pouring cereal onto a carcass digester and now you're medicating the digester for doing its job." Vegan: "So your argument is that we're vultures." Paleoanthropologist: "My argument is a number. Yours is a feeling about gorillas. The gorilla eats for most of the day and its gut is a fermentation tank. Yours is done in a few hours and runs on acid. One of you is designed for leaves." Moderator: "Thirty seconds." Paleoanthropologist: "She can keep them. I'm still waiting on the salad."

@NeumimTweetovat Ořízněte vrch fotky a bude to ideální profilovka.

@jura_haczek Cyril dělá ostudu svému příjmení .

@MercuryBarbora To je ale kokot.

@kmotra_liska Kouše mě nádobíčko jen při té představě .

Yesterday, President Trump said that the US will ask Europe to repay the money the US spent on Ukraine. My thoughts on that: First and foremost, the people of Ukraine are deeply grateful to the United States for all the assistance provided! Indeed, Ukraine has received real and massive military assistance from the United States - $67.8 billion in committed defense articles and services: over 10,000 Javelin systems, over 3,000 Stingers, dozens of HIMARS, Patriot, and NASAMS systems, Abrams tanks, Bradley and Stryker fighting vehicles, howitzers, and millions of artillery shells. Part of the U.S. assistance was provided as non-repayable grants. Aid to Ukraine also included U.S. defense spending and orders placed with American industry. The cost of aid to Ukraine and the economic and security benefits for the U.S. existed simultaneously. First, the U.S. did not transfer $195 billion to Ukraine. This figure represents the total budgetary framework of the U.S. response to the war, which includes not only weapons and financial aid to Ukraine, but also U.S. troops in Europe, the replenishment of U.S. military stockpiles, purchases from its own military-industrial complex, logistics, and agency operations. As of March 31, 2026, out of $195 billion, $177.8 billion had been obligated and $116 billion actually disbursed. Moreover, roughly $4.2 billion within this system already came from allies via the PURL, PURL, rather than from the American taxpayer. Second, nearly $50 billion of this amount was not aid to Ukraine at all - it was U.S. spending on its own troops in Europe. This includes EUCOM, the European Deterrence Initiative, troop deployments, transport, logistics, infrastructure, and sustaining the U.S. military presence. These were real U.S. budget expenditures caused by the war, but Ukraine never received these funds. Presenting them as an American "gift to Ukraine" that Europe must now compensate for is incorrect. Third, nearly $46 billion more was allocated to replenish the U.S.’s own arsenals. The U.S. provided weapons to Ukraine from its own stockpiles, after which the Pentagon received funds to replace them. In effect, Ukraine might have received an older system, while new budget funds went to American manufacturers to produce new weapons for the U.S. As a result, these expenditures simultaneously funded the rearmament of the U.S. military and the operations of American factories. In other words, tens of billions of dollars in military assistance did not go directly to Ukraine - they were converted into defense contracts inside the United States. Through USAI, new systems, ammunition, and military services for Ukraine are funded through manufacturers. Through replenishment, U.S. companies produce replacements for what the Pentagon transferred to Ukraine. The beneficiaries include Lockheed Martin, RTX, General Dynamics, Boeing, BAE Systems, Oshkosh, AM General, AeroVironment, L3Harris, and a large network of suppliers. Fourth, the United States gained just corporate revenue from this spending, but also new production capacity. Funds went toward expanding production of 155mm ammunition, PAC-3 MSE, GMLRS, Javelins, and other systems. The war exposed shortages in the U.S. military-industrial complex while at the same time providing the Pentagon with funding to address them. In other words, part of the assistance to Ukraine became an investment in America’s own defense industrial base. Fifth, direct transfers of money to the Ukrainian government were far smaller than the political claims about "hundreds of billions." The largest block of direct budget support amounted to around $30 billion and was provided mainly through the World Bank for civilian expenditures - salaries for Ukrainian teachers and medical workers, pensions, and social payments. There were also humanitarian, energy, and economic programs. This was real financial assistance to Ukraine. But that is precisely why it should be distinguished from the tens of billions spent by the Pentagon inside the United States. Sixth, the narrative that America was paying instead of Europe does not reflect the scale of European assistance. The EU and its member states estimate their total support for Ukraine and Ukrainians at more than €220 billion. According to U.S. accounting, the United States committed $67.8 billion in military assistance, while total security assistance from allies and partners amounted to around $130 billion. The accounting methodologies differ, so these figures should not be mechanically compared dollar for dollar. But they certainly do not show a situation in which America paid while Europe did not. Seventh, Europe is already financing American weapons for Ukraine. Through PURL, allies transfer funds to the United States for the supply of the American weapons to Ukraine and for the replenishment of American stockpiles. By March 2026, the figure was already approximately $4.2 billion. And in the first half of 2026, European donors purchased at least €3 billion worth of weapons for Ukraine from U.S. defense companies. In other words, part of the current system literally works in the opposite direction: European money → the U.S. military-industrial complex → weapons for Ukraine. Yes, the United States provided aid to Ukraine, but not as some enormous free transfer made in place of Europe. In reality, Ukraine received critically important assistance for which we will remain grateful, Europe spent vast sums of its own money, and a significant share of U.S. spending remained inside the United States itself - in the form of new weapons, replenished stockpiles, a strengthened military presence, and multibillion-dollar contracts for the U.S. military-industrial complex.

@ThomasSowell Sure. People are losing jobs because of AI in IT industry so salaries are going to hell. He can be right in the fact that it will create wealth to someone. That's for sure.

@Lunaglowblaze Ai

Chinese researchers have developed the best shortest-path algorithm in 41 years! Dijkstra’s Algorithm has been the undefeated king of the shortest path for over 40 years. Whether you’re using Google Maps, booking a flight, or routing internet packets, Dijkstra is the engine running in the background. Since 1984, textbooks have taught that its efficiency was hit by a "sorting barrier." To find the shortest path, you have to sort the points by distance. And sorting has a mathematical floor you can’t cross. Until now. A research team from Tsinghua University just published a paper that shatters the 41-year-old record. They proved that Dijkstra is not optimal. By combining the logic of the Bellman-Ford algorithm with a revolutionary "recursive partial ordering" method, they figured out how to find the path without fully sorting the nodes. The results are a massive shift in theoretical computer science: - The first deterministic improvement to the Single-Source Shortest Path (SSSP) problem since 1984. - A new time complexity of $ O(m \log^{2/3} n)$, officially beating the long-standing $ O(m + n \log n)$ limit. - On massive sparse graphs (like the web or global logistics), this means finding the best route significantly faster than previously thought possible. For four decades, the greatest minds in algorithms believed this limit was absolute. Last year, even the legendary Robert Tarjan won an award proving Dijkstra was "optimally efficient" at sorting distances. Tsinghua’s answer? Stop sorting. The world’s most settled problem is suddenly wide open again. If we can break a 40-year-old law in basic graph theory, what other "impossible" speed limits are waiting to be crushed?

Mám dvě otázky, paní ministryně @alenaschillerov: 1) Na běžný provoz si budeme muset půjčit dvakrát víc než letos.(Letos 47 mld, příští rok 99 mld). Proč dvojnásobnému tempu projídání říkáme “proinvestiční”? 2) Deficit veřejných financí bude 3,5% HDP. Vy ale uvádíte 2,8%, protože odečítáte únikovou doložku obranných výdajů, i když do deficitu patří. U okolních států, se kterými nás srovnáváte, ale tuto doložku neodečítáte. Sčítáte jablka a hrušky, dělíte švestkami. To se Vám zdá férové?

Alena Schillerová @alenaschillerov

2 months ago

Dnes představíme férový a proinvestiční rozpočet. Je symbolické, že ve stejný den vydává @NKU_CZ stanovisko k závěrečnému účtu za poslední rozpočet Fialovy vlády a upozorňuje na obří nesoulad rozpočtu s realitou. Připomeňme si některé účetní fauly roku 2025 ⤵️ S tím je konec!

126 15 101 130K 4

@ivan_pilip Odkud to je? To asi není z X.

@imatrix Má to tažný?