NEW: By a 6–3 vote, the Supreme Court allows Idaho to enforce its ban on gender-affirming care for minors, except to the specific plaintiffs who brought the case. The three liberals dissent. Much debate about national injunctions and the shadow docket. s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2454…
Justice Jackson's dissent is pretty shady, and this paragraph's final sentence will sting s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2454…
@mjs_DC So gender affirmation is affirming genitalia mutation?
We need to make the president aware of how we feel about this : user the contact form at whitehouse gov Dear Mr President I will keep this short. Sadly, the Supreme Court upheld yet another abusive law making it harder for parents of children with Gender incongruence to get care for their children. These are ugly laws written by well-funded special interests and supported by abusive State Governors like Brad Little; these kids mean nothing to him but Lobby money and votes. You claim you need our community support, and we and our companies are willing to support your re-election. But that will be hard to do if you keep ignoring laws that step on the rights of parents to decide the best medical care for their children. We ask you to do something, especially if you want our 100% commitment to your re-election. Sincerely
@mjs_DC Does this mean that EVERY PARENT OR GUARDIAN of a transitioning child in Idaho must file suit separately in order to obtain their child's medical treatment?
@mjs_DC why does nearly every person who doesn't support this decision look like they may fondle a kid or two...
@mjs_DC We must vote every one of them out of office, all Republicans