A bombshell new peer-reviewed study has provided conclusive scientific evidence proving that carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in Earth’s atmosphere cannot cause “global warming.” Dr. Jan Kubicki led a group of world-renowned Polish scientists to study the impact of increases in CO2 emissions on the Earth’s global temperatures. However, not only did they find that higher levels of CO2 made no difference, but they also proved that it simply isn’t possible for increases in carbon dioxide to cause temperatures to rise. Kubicki and his team recently published three papers which all conclude that Earth’s atmosphere is already “saturated” with carbon dioxide. This saturation means that, even at greatly increased levels of CO2, the “greenhouse gas” will not cause temperatures to rise. Kubicki et al. summarize their evidence by noting that as a result of saturation, “emitted CO2 does not directly cause an increase in global temperature.” Current levels of CO2 in the atmosphere are around 418 parts per million (ppm) but the scientists state that past 400 ppm, “the CO2 concentration can no longer cause any increase in temperature.” slaynews.com/news/top-study…
@newstart_2024 Dr Willie Soon debunked this totally flawed and cherry picked carbon theory of the WEF elites also and was character assassinated for his trouble. x.com/tuckercarlson/…
@newstart_2024 Dr Willie Soon debunked this totally flawed and cherry picked carbon theory of the WEF elites also and was character assassinated for his trouble. x.com/tuckercarlson/…
@newstart_2024 Here is the actual study from sciencedirect. slay is not known as a reputable news outlet, but sciencedirect is legit. Best to go read the paper and decide if they characterized it correctly: sciencedirect.com/science/articl… 🌡️
“Decoupling CO2 from Climate Change” published March 26, 2024, by Nelson et al, reviewed 500 million year, 50 million year, and 1 million year time periods. It showed that 42% of the time the CO2 and temperature travelled in opposite directions. And up to 40% of time the amount of change was either zero or near zero, negating a stimulus/response connection.
@newstart_2024 Well now what? Can we have all our money backs from these damn criminals now? 😡
Kubicki's study supports the Princeton findings William Happer, PhD, Professor Emeritus in the Department of Physics at Princeton University, at the Fifteenth International Conference on Climate Change, where he discusses the Schwarzschild equation and diagram – and the science of CO2 heating. youtu.be/svZqLy2jEQk?si… #CO2 #greenhousegas #GlobalWarming
@newstart_2024 @DavidBCollum So, it's a total con-job then?🤔
@newstart_2024 It's simple, as more co2 is in the atmosphere, trees grow bigger to compensate, since co2 is directly linked to food production in plants. (see "photosynthesis") It's an automatically adjusting system.
@newstart_2024 Net zero is a scam. It is nothing about carbon. It’s a leftist plot to reduce the average citizen to compliant serfdom status before the enriched socialist leadership.
@newstart_2024 Oh dear ... Sky News ... referencing a climate-denial blog ... it does not get more garbage than that ... but typical of climate deniers. Try credible sources. The evils of climate denial are exposed in the critically-acclaimed routledge.com/Climate-Denial… 🌏🔥 #ClimateBrawl 🔥🌏
@newstart_2024 This story has been done so many times it’s boring..