plaidslacks @plaidslacks

Joined August 2021

Tweets

1K
Followers

228
Following

1K
Likes

45K

plaidslacks @plaidslacks

4 years ago

@CraigJStrachan @DrJBhattacharya Bingo. This is the answer.

0 0 7 85 0

View Details

@moshuajoody1 @CricketsMatter @elonmusk @micsolana If goal is to remove the illicit market. But the goal should be safe communities, for which legalization has the exact opposite effect. Illicit sales is the Trojan horse here to sell people on a failed policy. Legal widespread open hard drug use destroys the social fabric.

0 0 1 36 0

View Details

plaidslacks @plaidslacks

4 years ago

@VP Unless you want to marry an unvaccinated foreign national (more than half the population of Earth). In that case, Americans are sol. Their partners can’t even enter the country. #facts

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

plaidslacks @plaidslacks

4 years ago

@EvaVlaar I have been trying to get this point across since the beginning! Absolutely correct. We need to be logical and consistent in our arguments that this is not just about efficacy, but about morality and more specifically, bodily autonomy.

0 0 7 0 0

View Details

plaidslacks @plaidslacks

4 years ago

@VogonPoetrySlam @TimRobbins1 Suggesting something is acceptable because it’s the same as something that exists is not logical. The point is it’s unethical for many reasons (that you might or might not agree with). For many people this is a body autonomy issue and t/f of foundational importance (me included).

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

plaidslacks @plaidslacks

4 years ago

@wildflowerluva @CanadianDis US cable news is an amazing narrative creation tool. Its basically 24/7 pablum and as a result the vast majority of Americans have no clue this issue exists and t/f no pressure to change it.

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

plaidslacks @plaidslacks

4 years ago

@TonyChiaroscuro @PaulMitchell_AB I basically agree with you, the JCCF have showed courage that other lawyers haven’t. But still, if they can’t eke out a win even in the most egregious, grotesque cases like this, I can’t help but wonder if they are simply not considered a credible firm by the bench.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

plaidslacks @plaidslacks

4 years ago

@JohnCunnington5 The Justice system has failed but so have the hundreds perhaps thousands of lawyers who fought against us, concocting depraved justifications for this foul overreach.

0 0 15 0 0

View Details

plaidslacks @plaidslacks

4 years ago

@DavidHamer_1951 @ReginaWatteel It’s interesting that you don’t have the foggiest clue that in fact it is you who is acting similar to a fascist by attempting to smear legitimate opposition with a pejorative label, which incidentally is a ludicrous misconception of reality. Lots of us have degrees by the way.

1 0 0 0 0

View Details

plaidslacks @plaidslacks

4 years ago

@canada2021dgopg @TrueNorthCentre @AndrewLawton At this point that ship has sailed. This type of legislation is more effective for two reasons. It makes it impossible to discriminate and reframes the issue as one of human rights, which forces supposedly “inclusive” organizations to get these segregation policies off the books.

2 0 0 0 0

View Details

plaidslacks @plaidslacks

4 years ago

@canmericanized Dems use the “border crisis” to rile conservatives up about border security. It’s why every comment from Americans about vax mandates is “just walk across the southern border”. With Reps screaming for “border security” there’s no political will to open the northern border either.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

plaidslacks @plaidslacks

4 years ago

@bruce_y_lee @Forbes Are you Canadian? Do you have any unvaccinated Canadian friends or family? If you don’t, and are not willing to interview some for your “article” you should take a seat or stay in your lane. You know nothing about the issue and this article is grossly one sided.

2 0 5 0 0

View Details

plaidslacks @plaidslacks

4 years ago

@KathleenGanley @JanisIrwin You seem to be struggling with the fact that it’s you that should be apologizing for supporting discrimination.

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

plaidslacks @plaidslacks

4 years ago

@Kyle_Itzy @Diorfoo @CTVNews Hey, real Canadian here. Danielle Smith is 100% correct in her statement and you can block and gaslight all you want. We will be fighting until vaccine segregation is acknowledged, apologized for and prevented from ever happening again. Basic human rights are non-negotiable.

3 1 1 0 0

View Details

plaidslacks @plaidslacks

4 years ago

@kwame_mckenzie @IrfanDhalla What evidence are you talking about? What other group has experienced more discrimination? I think you need to look at the evidence. It’s everywhere. Lost jobs. Lost opportunities. Refused service. Treated like second class citizens. Wake up. Try reading Juliette Ponesse.

1 0 6 0 0

View Details

plaidslacks @plaidslacks

4 years ago

@IrfanDhalla Soon, perhaps sooner than you think, the biographies of those you segregated and treated second class will be published. Social history will not be forgotten or wished away because you think you have the moral high ground. You don’t. You have participated in a massive injustice.

1 0 14 0 0

View Details

plaidslacks @plaidslacks

4 years ago

@peterbojensen @WashupCyclone @cspotweet *facie

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

plaidslacks @plaidslacks

4 years ago

@peterbojensen @WashupCyclone @cspotweet Huh? Not sure you have the intellect to understand but I’ll say it again. The person perpetrating discrimination bears the burden of proof. In this case that person is you, and you have not met your burden because vaccine segregation is prima facile indecent and immoral.