Sander Van de Cruys @sandervdc

Like most psychologists I like people, in theory. sandervandecruys.be Ramsel Joined June 2010

Tweets

195
Followers

463
Following

2K
Likes

651

Yi-Lun Jheng @yilunchengtw

5 months ago

📢New publication! Our research on strategies to correct vaccine misinformation on social media🧬📱is out now in @SciReports ! 🔗 nature.com/articles/s4159…

5 2 8 245 0

Yi-Lun Jheng @yilunchengtw

5 months ago

@SciReports 🙌Huge thanks to my supportive co-authors: @sandervdc , Larissa De Brabandere, @KirstenMaertens & @KPoels ! 🤗Please share with anyone interested in #HealthComm, #Misinformation, #ScienceCommunication, or #VaccineResearch!

0 2 5 106 0

How come grant funding decisions are so biased and random given that reviewers & panel are trying their best to do the right thing? There's just no signal to detect. You can't predict what science will be important without doing it. All you can get is noise and unconscious bias.

1 1 20 1K 0

Eiko Fried @EikoFried

a year ago

If you want to make a dent into rates of mental health problems, make sure people have a roof over their heads, health insurance coverage, enough food to eat. Let's start there. And let's not forget Kendler: "You would not explain hypertension at the level of quarks".

7 30 145 8K 13

Koenfucius 🔍 @koenfucius

a year ago

You’d think that conspiracy theorists are gullible, shallow thinkers. But you’d be wrong, argue @sjgadsby and @sandervdc—people who endorse and spread mad theories are intelligent, but they’re drawn (a bit too much) to the intoxicating lure of discovery: buff.ly/3Zwl5Yt

0 4 5 316 4

Download Image

Alberto Acerbi @acerbialberto

a year ago

I discuss (favourably) this hypothesis in my forthcoming book on digital technopanics.

0 2 7 1K 3

Download Image

Dan Williams @danwilliamsphil

a year ago

3 8 61 8K 9

Download Image

Rob Sica @robsica

a year ago

"A relevant distinction is between perspective-taking and perspective-getting – don’t just try to put yourself in someone else’s shoes (perspective-taking); genuinely enquire about how they see the world (perspective-getting)."

0 2 4 418 0

Stefan Schubert @StefanFSchubert

a year ago

Uncovering genuine secrets of nature and delusional conspiracy theories can subjectively feel the same (‘aha’).

3 3 18 2K 5

Navkuran Ghuman @it0from1bit

a year ago

Great piece by @sandervdc H/t @erikphoel for sharing it on their s'stack

0 2 3 886 1

Download Image

Tom Ringstrom 🦡 @no_reward_for_u

a year ago

RL researchers will never "solve" the intrinsic reward problem--high-dimensional rewards or value functions will never be tenable as a theory. You can only respond to how things in the world (externally, internally) impact the structure of what you are, which is high-dimensional.

Air Katakana @airkatakana

a year ago

312 196 3K 292K 636

1 2 11 1K 1

Ruxandra Teslo 🧬 @RuxandraTeslo

a year ago

“Any system that is not explicitly pro-Weird Nerd will turn anti-Weird Nerd pretty quickly.” My essay on why those looking to create/improve intellectual institutions need to take Rux's rule into account -- with loads of references to Katalin Kariko. writingruxandrabio.com/p/the-weird-ne……

43 189 999 525K 627

Andreas De Block @DeblockBlock

a year ago

Apparently, the secret to fair funding decisions is... skipping the proposals altogether. Who knew all that effort was optional? "We find that withholding proposal texts from panelists did not detectibly impact their proposal rankings." link.springer.com/article/10.100…