slow3000 @slow3000

@chanduuu_cs SVN (Subversion) before that, CVS (concurrent versioning system), before that, some used RCS (revision control system) The Microsoft world mainly worked with Visual Source Safe (or VSS).

0 0 0 35 0

View Details

@DigitalFleurie Sorry, but I think your husband is the outlier here. We went outside in the rain in raincoats and boots already as kids, and there is a reason that companies like Deuter, Vaude and Jack Wolfskin exist 😁. As my mom used to say, we’re not made out of sugar…

0 0 3 31 0

View Details

slow3000 @slow3000

3 days ago

@HankDesmondPhD If there were no cameras, how did you come across that picture? Also, which AI was used to generate it?

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

slow3000 @slow3000

3 days ago

@AlwaysBeThinkin @jacob_posel Not in Germany, Austria,, Poland, Denmark, Norway, Greece, Ukraine, Russia etc…, bud…

1 0 18 1K 0

View Details

How To Prompt @HowToPrompt__

5 days ago

Researchers mathematically proved that AI will cause something worse than mass unemployment. They call it “The Tragedy of the Cognitive Commons.” Every industry relies on a shared pool of deep professional expertise. This expertise doesn't just magically appear. It regenerates generation after generation. How? Through struggle. Junior employees do the hard, repetitive, frustrating work. In exchange, they slowly build what researchers call "Internalized Mastery." But right now, AI is completely annihilating junior-level work. Companies are celebrating massive productivity boosts by automating the entry-level grind. (Anthropic’s own data shows their technical junior hiring has plunged 33% as AI agents take over the pipeline). It looks like efficiency. But it is actually a time bomb. The researchers highlight a concept called the "Validation Tether." Effective human oversight of AI depends entirely on deep domain expertise. When an AI hallucinates or makes a critical error, a human expert catches it. The experts validating AI outputs today look competent because they spent a decade doing the grunt work before AI existed. The terrifying question the paper asks is this: Who comes after them? When the current generation of experts retires, there will be no one left with the Internalized Mastery required to spot when the machine is wrong. We are completely severing the pipeline that creates human competence. We are trading our long-term intellectual independence for short-term productivity boosts. Every time you let AI bypass the struggle, you are borrowing expertise from the future. And the interest rate is our ability to think for ourselves.

113 557 2K 196K 1K

View Details

slow3000 @slow3000

4 days ago

@DigitalFleurie @Marcel4EU Represent!

0 0 1 15 0

View Details

slow3000 @slow3000

4 days ago

@NaikeLeNormand 20… ich habe sogar einen Film bei Blockbuster ausgeliehen 😁

0 0 1 2 0

View Details

slow3000 @slow3000

5 days ago

@DigitalFleurie Apparently the IUD also cut her hair?

1 0 1 38 0

View Details

slow3000 @slow3000

5 days ago

@CryptoProfit777 @brookschaaf @nntaleb You are probably right, it’s just not yet clear which decade…

0 0 0 57 0

View Details

slow3000 @slow3000

6 days ago

@DigitalFleurie It‘s not because yo‘re not German I think, and it‘s usually not a negotiation, more like working through a check list set by the law to make sure no one is discriminated against during the hiring and maybe also that you‘re in the right salary bracket for the job.