小云的爱车小天地 @straight_bash

@YaBoyHasz 庆阳到西安这段高速大踏板能跑，风挡我1米78，骑起来胸口不怎么顶风；你多高？我可以按你的身高说说风挡够不够。

兰州这台SYM大踏板像会照顾人的成熟姐姐，坐姿宽松，风挡也实用。天水、白银、庆阳想看通勤和长途表现，主页继续。

@phuku88 老款确实偏硬，这台我觉得软了一点但不算特别塌，跑两小时屁股还行。你之前骑的是哪一年的款？

@sweetveeonia 不是光说外形啦，主要是坐姿和风挡那种顺手的感觉。减震和油耗我也在测，你有特别在意的点吗？

@cheriz_galz 我试了，全盔得斜着塞，正常尺寸能进但盖得勉强。你平时是全盔还是半盔通勤？

@giri182 对吧，我跑了两趟小长途腰真没怎么闹，坐垫支撑给得挺足。你要是常跑长途，改天再细说减震感受？

Some CLL treatments may have effects on the immune system that continue after treatment ends. Understanding these effects may be particularly important during flu season.

@mika_systems that colorway is too clean to ignore

@0xkerazcity those new balances actually go crazy on the toe

@xSmiley_ox 哈哈被你发现了，先攒着周边车源，熟路好跑。辽宁这边你熟哪块，有靠谱的车行或者车友可以给我引荐下？

沈阳今天碰到一台二手雅马哈仿赛，外壳有轻微使用痕迹，车架和动力却挺利落，像经历过一些事却没失掉脾气。大连、鞍山、抚顺，主页有后续。

@pbc_dez08 确实，花壳最怕是摔过补的，我趴下去看减震上盖和转向限位都还干净，车头没那种别扭的偏。你也看这台？要不我把细节图发你帮瞅瞅？

@immastar08 对，太亮反而不敢骑，有点痕迹才没心理负担。日常代步你更看重哪块？

@LMR236 确实，壳新不新都是钱堆出来的，车架手感骗不了人。你当时那台最后卖给懂行的没？

@wifey_type4 哈哈就是随口一写，实车比照片精神。你要真想看我可以把车行位置发你，不过得挑个白天去。

@migoooooo R15，轻痕基本在两侧整流罩和尾部，车架和发动机没动过。你要在沈阳的话可以约着一起去看？

@JojoBaybeee 是，我宁可壳花点也不想碰上焊过车架的。你挑二手是先试动力还是先看骨架？

@RabitManH 太对了，铁西那边摆得锃亮的一打火就哆嗦的也不少。你上个月那台最后拿下了吗？

@alnewnie 对，我也是先趴地上看焊点和链轮齿，外壳花不花倒是最后才看的。你平时看车会带个小手电不？

Anthropic's biology team wired their research model into Blender, and the lab stopped drawing diagrams entirely Most biology figures are illustrated after the fact, an artist reading a paper and guessing at the geometry, which means the picture can be wrong and nobody can tell. The model builds the figure from the data itself, so the scene is a claim you can check rather than a drawing you have to trust: > Ingest: it reads the structures, binding data and timing straight from the experiment > Construct: Blender assembles the molecules at real scale, nothing eyeballed > Animate: the interaction plays out on the timings the assay actually measured > Trace: every object links back to the dataset that placed it • Why generated figures beat illustrated ones > A wrong distance is visible, because the scale is real > New data re-renders the figure instead of commissioning a new one > A reviewer can click an object and see the measurement behind it • What the lab stopped paying for > The illustration contract on every paper > Weeks of back-and-forth describing geometry in words > Figures that quietly drift from the data they came from • What it changed in the science > Two proteins that looked compatible on paper visibly clashed at real scale > A timing the team assumed was simultaneous turned out to lag > Three figures got pulled before submission because the geometry disagreed One figure rebuilds from new data in under a minute. And the part that broke my brain: A scientific illustrator bills $1,200 and three weeks per figure. The model rebuilt the whole set overnight after one dataset changed. Same figure. One of them can be wrong without anyone noticing. The problem was never making the picture look good. It was making it accountable to the data ↓

Codio @0xCodio

2 weeks ago

x.com/i/article/2109…

18 30 504 755K 1K