Tim Sutherland @timdsutherland

@thegarybrecka Once. Just played a golf tourney today and they put on lunch.

@conservmillen or what if she used a gun?

@MattWalshBlog My last jury experience was an obvious guilty. We had one hold out who made no sense. What should have taken 10 minutes ended up being two hours until that person realized they were wrong. Person was low IQ and emotional.

@EthicalSkeptic @grok explain this like I'm 10 years old

@shipwreckedcrew give me $1400 for a new set and I will. Otherwise, this is all stupid and forgotten in two weeks.

@thegarybrecka Stopped 1:30 am snack after waking up to use the restroom. Now doing at least a 10 hour fast. Breathwork everyday.

@thegarybrecka 100% hours needed 91% consistency 92% efficiency

@thegarybrecka Breathwork

@thegarybrecka New to sardines. Wild caught exclusively?

@DefiantLs Celebrating a birthday after 21.

@tomselliott @FBIDirectorKash Why do you say that Tom?

I’m told @MattWalshBlog would say this is dog 💩

A man said "I accept Jesus Christ" on his deathbed. The church asked if he really meant it. I need to ask you something. When did we become the gatekeepers of grace? I've watched Christians dissect Scott Adams' final words like prosecutors. They parsed his phrases. They weighed his tone. They measured his faith against some invisible scale and found it wanting. "That doesn't sound like surrender," they said. "That sounds like a man hedging his bets." And I understand the instinct. I do. But there's a verse that haunts me. Not because it's obscure—because it's too simple. "Whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved." (Romans 10:13) Whosoever. Not "whosoever truly believes in their heart of hearts." Not "whosoever demonstrates sufficient sincerity." Not "whosoever calls early enough in life that we trust their motives." Whosoever. The moment we add prerequisites to that promise, we've traded the Gospel for religion. We've smuggled works back in through the side door labeled "authentic faith." I know what some of you are thinking. But he admitted he wasn't a believer. He talked about "risk and reward." He said he hoped he'd "qualify." Yes. He did. And those words make us uncomfortable. They don't sound like the confident declarations we want from converts. They sound uncertain. Calculating. Human. But here's what I need you to hear: The thief on the cross didn't have time to develop mature theology either. He was a criminal. Hours from death. He looked at Jesus and said, "Lord, remember me when you come into your kingdom." That's it. No profession of belief in the resurrection. No renunciation of his former life. No evidence of transformed character. Just a desperate man, reaching for a hand he wasn't sure would take his. And Jesus said, "Today you will be with me in paradise." We have a problem, and it's not Scott Adams. It's us. We've internalized a law that God never gave us. A natural sense of fairness that says late arrivals should get less. That deathbed conversions are suspicious. That the math should somehow work out—more faith, more years, more sacrifice equals more standing before God. Jesus told a parable about this. We skip over it because it offends us. A landowner hired workers throughout the day. Some came at dawn. Some at noon. Some showed up with one hour left. At the end, he paid them all the same. The early workers were furious. "These who were hired last worked only one hour, and you have made them equal to us who have borne the burden of the work and the heat of the day." (Matthew 20:12) And the landowner replied: "I am not being unfair to you, friend. Didn't you agree to work for a denarius? Don't I have the right to do what I want with my own money? Or are you envious because I am generous?" There it is. The scandal of grace is that it feels unfair. A man who mocked God for sixty years gets the same inheritance as the saint who served since childhood. A skeptic who hedged his bets at the last breath stands in the same kingdom as the martyr who gave everything. And something in us recoils. That's not grace rejecting us. That's us rejecting grace. Let me tell you what I see when Christians interrogate a dead man's faith. I see the older brother standing outside the party, refusing to go in. The prodigal came home reeking of pig filth and poor decisions. The father ran to him. Threw a robe on his back. Killed the fattened calf. And the older brother? "Look! All these years I've been slaving for you and never disobeyed your orders. Yet you never gave me even a young goat so I could celebrate with my friends. But when this son of yours who has squandered your property with prostitutes comes home, you kill the fattened calf for him!" (Luke 15:29-30) He couldn't celebrate the return because he was too busy auditing the journey. Sound familiar? Here's the truth we don't want to face: We can't see hearts. We can only see words. And the words Scott Adams spoke were: "I accept Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior." Were they perfect? No. Were they confident? No. Were they the words we would have scripted? No. But they were the words. And the God who receives those words is not checking for tone. He's not running sentiment analysis. He's not grading on a curve. He's looking for open hands. Paul wrote something that lands differently now: "Who are you to judge someone else's servant? To their own master, servants stand or fall. And they will stand, for the Lord is able to make them stand." (Romans 14:4) Scott Adams was not our servant to judge. He answered to his own Master. And the Lord is able—able—to make him stand. That's not my promise. That's Scripture's promise. The question is whether we'll submit to it. I know why we do this. I know why we parse and weigh and question. Because if grace is really this free, then we didn't earn our place either. If the deathbed convert gets in, then our decades of service weren't the price of admission. They were the privilege of knowing Him longer. And that reframes everything. It means the faith we've built isn't a resume. It's a relationship. It means our years weren't buying something. They were receiving something. It means we were never the workers earning a wage. We were always the prodigals coming home. So did Scott Adams get saved? I don't know. But I know what the Scripture says. Whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. I know what Jesus promised the thief who had nothing to offer but a desperate plea. I know what the father did when his son came crawling home with a rehearsed speech that never even got finished. And I know what the landowner said to the workers who were angry that grace didn't do math the way they wanted. "Are you envious because I am generous?" The gate is narrow, but it's not locked. The standard is high, but it's not ours to enforce. The Judge is holy, but He is also the one who ran to meet the prodigal while he was still a long way off. Stop auditing the dead. Start marveling at the grace that let you in. "Whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved." Whosoever. Even him. Even you. What saith the Scriptures? That's the only question that matters.

@thegarybrecka Sun. But I live in PNW and haven't seen it in months! Also, the ocean and sand. See above and I live inland. Grass to ground. It's frozen and stiff and wicked to stand on right now!!

Massive Democrat Money Laundering Discovered - Names include Gretchen Whitmer, Jon Ossoff and Cory Booker | Bob Cushman, The Gateway Pundit Once in a while, a reporter finds a story that challenges his or her ability to tell because it is so massive in terms of time and scope. He or she feels over-whelmed. This reporter feels that way, but let’s begin anyway. This story will attempt to show the reader the journey that this reporter has been on to discover what is most likely one of the largest money laundering evolutions in the history of this country. First Indications of Massive Money Laundering – 2019 Six years ago in October of 2019, I was downloading data from the FEC database, which by the way is quite easy to do. As I compiled the data I found that three Michigan Congresswomen had received about 75% of their total incoming campaign donations from out of the state of Michigan. At that time, this reporter was both amazed and confused. How could this possibly be? I decided to compile this information and wrote letters to William Barr (Attorney General), Christopher Wray (Director of FBI) and Matthew Schneider (US Attorney of SE Michigan). A copy of this letter which was sent to all three officials is as follows: In this letter I defined my purpose as: “The purpose of this letter is to request a thorough investigation into the legitimacy of campaign donations of three Michigan Congressional Districts, MI 8th, MI 11th and MI 13th. The extremely high “out of state” component of the individual donations and other factors strongly suggest a preponderance of “conduits” AKA straw donors which is a violation of Title 52, United States Code, Sections 30122 and 30109(a)(1)(A).” Unfortunately, I never received a substantive response from anyone. Amazing Increase in Money Flow to Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer Fast forward to November of 2023. I once again noticed something astonishing! While analyzing campaign contributions to Governor Whitmer, I was surprised to see the following: “After Whitmer contracted with the largest, most successful Democratic consultants known as GMMB her donation dollars increased by 100 fold and the number of donations per year increased by 265 fold!” How could this possibly happen? Is it possible that the payment to GMMB “facilitated” the increased flow of “Straw Donors” AKA “Smurfs”? Only an investigation that could produce subpoenas could find the truth! The details of my findings can be found here: Election Watch Press Release I then came across a Press release from Election Watch/ Peter Bernegger that stated: “A report by non-profit organizations, the Gibson Group of Maryland and Election Watch, has exposed a large-scale money laundering scheme in US political campaigns. This involves the use of “smurfs” – thousands of individuals who make numerous small donations to liberal PACs, committees or directly to candidates’ campaigns, in order to launder large sums of money. The report claims that over $200m has been laundered so far, with many of the smurfs being unaware their names and addresses are being used for donations. Investigation found that the smurfs tend to be primarily white, retired, liberal, and of middle to lower economic class.” Note: Peter Bernegger is, in my opinion the absolute authority on identifying “straw donors” AAK “smurfs”. I encourage readers to visit the following website: You will be amazed at the data that has been composed for your benefit! Peter is without question one of the leading Patriots in this country fighting for election integrity! Letter to James Comer: Fast forward to September of 2024. This author composed a letter to James Comer – Chair of the Congressional Oversight Committee. In this letter I stated the letter’s purpose as follows: “As a citizen journalist/investigative reporter, I have spent several hundred hours, in the past few years, researching and reporting on the subject matter of your investigation. I am responding to your announcement with some of my work in hopes that it may prove helpful to your investigation. The most important aspect of laundered money in the campaign finance sector is that our right to be represented by our elected officials has been stolen in large part by massive amounts of laundered money! This cannot be overstated! I believe there have been billions of dollars illegally laundered by ActBlue in the last two decades, and more recently and to a much lesser degree, by WinRed! I think it highly likely that the FEC is complicit or at the very least, guilty of malfeasance in this regard.” To view the letter to James Comer see the following: In my data research I discovered 20 smurfs that I labeled as the Corey Booker Smurfs. A summary of these smurfs is as follows: All of these so called donors are seniors with the average being 80 years old. Amazingly these 20 persons have been accused of donating over 2.6 million dollars in over 187,000 separate donations. It should be noted that conventional wisdom indicates that these elderly persons had their identities stolen and that they did not actually make anywhere close to this ridiculous amount of donations/money. Investigations by many, including James O Keefe, Peter Bernegger and myself have shown that most, if not all, of individuals similarly involved are actually “straw donors” AKA “smurfs”. Trump Orders DOJ to Investigate ActBlue! Fast forward to April of 2025 In April 2025, President Donald Trump ordered the Justice Department (DOJ) to investigate foreign money flowing through campaign funds, specifically targeting ActBlue, the Democrats’ main fundraising platform, citing “straw donor” schemes and illegal foreign contributions. Seditious Six – Recipients of Money Laundering Fast forward to December – 2025. After conducting many hours of “spreadsheet analysis” this author issued a report in which I state: “It now appears that the six lawmakers have been found to have been heavily involved in money laundering. Investigative Reporter/Citizen Journalist, Bob Cushman, has just released an FEC data analysis that strongly suggests that Mark Kelly, Elissa Slotkin, Jason Crow, Chris Deluzio, Chrissy Houlahan and Maggie Goodlander have been recipients of illegally laundered campaign funds. In the initial investigation, Cushman cites 22 Smurf examples that have “allegedly” contributed almost three million dollars in more than 95,000 separate donations to Democratic coffers. All six members of the Seditious Six have received funds from one or more of these “smurfs”.” This report can be viewed at: The data contained in this report is summarized in this following chart: In this analysis, I labeled the 22 smurfs the Mark Kelly Smurfs since he was the only one in this study that received donations from all 22 smurfs. Once again the average age of these smurfs is senior level 77 years of age. Does anyone really believe that these 22 seniors contributed almost three million dollars in 95,000 separate donations? It is inconceivable to me that the FEC was not aware of this treachery! Perhaps one day we will see what person or persons at the FEC are indicted for these crimes! Shocking Revelation by Jason Roe – Campaign Strategist In a very informative news discussion between Pulitzer Prize Winning Journalist Charlie LeDuff in a “No BS Newshour Episode #395” and campaign strategist Jason Roe (Fraudette Smurf – YouTube) it was stated that ActBlue has allegedly received over 16 billion dollars since 2004. It was also revealed that several senior members of ActBlue have abruptly resigned since allegations of fraud have come forward and several federal investigations have begun in 2025. Jason Roe stated that people working within political campaigns for many years have been aware of the money laundering that was enabled by ActBlue and that Charlie LeDuff had, within the first few minutes of Episode 395, done a far better job of explaining how ActBlue had laundered money than any mainstream media ever had! Jason Roe further states that: - This activity is fraud - This activity is money laundering - This activity is funneling money from outside the US - That Republicans are now outraising Democrats for the first time in a decade Jason Roe explains that easy to obtain “soft money” is converted into hard to obtain “hard money”, in part, because candidates can use their campaign “hard money” to make television advertising buys at 40% of the rate that soft money manipulators can. If you are a campaign, you would give your bottom dollar to be holding hard dollars when it comes to “winning”. According to Jason Roe’s own testimony, persons like himself that actually run campaigns, have been aware of the illegal conversion of “soft money” to “hard money” through the use of straw donors, also known as “smurfs” for many years! U.S. Senators are Guilty of Using (or Conducting) Massive Money Laundering! The following chart may be downloaded at the following link: As I was comparing the two groups of smurfs that I previously uncovered, I decided to see what other Senators that may be involved in this Massive Money Laundering scenario. Please note that this Summary is but my initial effort and is expected to be expanded as time allows. I believe the average viewer will be a surprised as I was at the magnitude of this revelation. Discussion Regarding Eight Senators’ “Contributions” from 42 Smurfs - Does anyone really believe that Michael Berger of Pennsylvania really donated $1,324,205 in 24,680 separate donations? - Does anyone really believe that Susan Law of Fishers, Indiana donated a total of $1045.83 in 73 separate donations that average $14.33 each? - Does anyone believe that Susan Law would actually donate to these entities and about 75 others? ABBY FOR IOWA, ALSOBROOKS FOR SENATE, BENNET FOR COLORADO, BLUEWAVEAMERICA LLC, BOB CASEY FOR SENATE INC, BOLLIER FOR KANSAS, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO FOR SENATE, CHC BOLD PAC, CHERI BEASLEY FOR NORTH CAROLINA, CHRISSY HOULAHAN FOR CONGRESS, CORY BOOKER FOR SENATE, DAGA PAC, DCCC, DEBBIE FOR FLORIDA, DEMOCRATIC ACTION, DNC SERVICES CORP / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, DSCC, ELLIOTT FOR WEST VIRGINIA, EQUALITY PAC, FETTERMAN FOR PA, FRIENDS OF KATRINA CHRISTIANSEN, FRIENDS OF SHERROD BROWN, GALLEGO FOR ARIZONA, GILLIBRAND FOR SENATE, HALEY STEVENS FOR CONGRESS, JAIME HARRISON FOR US SENATE, JON OSSOFF FOR SENATE, KLOBUCHAR FOR MINNESOTA, MARCUS FOR GEORGIA, MRVAN FOR CONGRESS, OCCUPY DEMOCRATS ELECTION FUND, PETERS FOR MICHIGAN, SARA GIDEON FOR MAINE, SCHIFF FOR SENATE? - Does anyone believe that Wendy Zorn of NJ would really donate over $8,000.00 in 1,335 separate donations that only average $6.36 each? - Does anyone believe that Wendy Zorn made over 390 donations that were less than $2.00 each? - Does anyone really believe that Dave Hutton of California actually made 14,000 separate donations that total over one third of a million dollars? Of course not! We could go on ad nauseum but any cognitive able person will see that these small donations were originally designed to “stay under the radar” of financial sleuths such as myself. Truth be told it worked for almost two decades! Alas, no more!!!!! Epilogue It now can be seen that Senators Cory Booker, Mark Kelly, Elissa Slotkin, Raphael Warnock, Adam Schiff, Jon Ossoff, Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar are heavily and possibly criminally involved as recipients of what is obviously a massive money laundering effort that probably spans the past two decades! This grouping of 42 seniors, AKA “smurfs” reveals the dedicated efforts of some very determined, corrupt individuals to launder money into the Democratic sphere of campaign finance. These 42 persons are “alleged” to have donated over 7.4 million dollars in over 32,000 separate donations. The ActBlue scheme of “Too Small, Too Many To Find” has been discovered! This current revelation is just a current snapshot of what will be an ongoing and probably ever growing investigatory effort. Stay Tuned Fellow Patriots and please share this as you are able! The Best (Or Worse) is Yet to Come! Bob Cushman – Investigative Reporter The Freedom Press michiganscorruption.com ... Notes: - Evidence is available at FEC.GOV as well as: and - 30 donations occurred after Linda Luna’s Death on May 5, 2024! - 785 Donations were made after Joan Wofford’s death on January 30, 2023! Read more: thegatewaypundit.com/2025/12/massiv…

@thegarybrecka I try to hold off an hour and half to extend my fast to 13 hours. Should I not?

@thegarybrecka Just got a Whoops to start tracking my sleep.

@elonmuskTN 10

@xomgclipz @grok what did she say to the lady that fell?

President Trump will receive late Prime Minister Abe's golf clubs, per Akie Abe's wishes. The bag is signed by golfer Hideki Matsuyama, and golf balls are adorned with golden leaves from Ishikawa Prefecture; home of the ancient Maeda clan. Japanese golf clubs are considered some of the best and most expensive in the world, from Honma to Mizuno.