RipVanWinkle @twplsource

AI, geopolitics Catskill, NY Joined July 2018

Tweets

4K
Followers

148
Following

700
Likes

2K

RipVanWinkle @twplsource

23 hours ago

@carlwheless @bofrench @KenPaxtonTX @SaraGonzalesTX @Savsays @Michellebbz thank you 🙏

0 0 0 18 0

View Details

Yesterday I uploaded my auto insurance policy to Meta @Muse and asked for a better rate with identical coverage. In ~5 minutes, it found a policy saving me $3,500 /year, bought it, and canceled my old one. I knew I was overpaying. I’d abandoned several attempts to switch because insurance websites and aggregator portals are so painful. Why fill out forms, compare quotes, and field sales calls when an agent can finish the entire job in five minutes? Killer product.

40 19 438 496K 412

View Details

RipVanWinkle @twplsource

2 days ago

@Bluebearmonkey see that’s why muricans don’t score well in math 😜

0 0 0 12 0

View Details

RipVanWinkle @twplsource

2 days ago

@rao2z lol 😂

0 0 0 513 0

View Details

RipVanWinkle @twplsource

2 days ago

@elonmusk @dwarkesh_sp what hmm

Subbarao Kambhampati (కంభంపాటి సుబ్బారావు) @rao2z

4 days ago

If your agents escaped your sandbox, may be its because you are lousy at building sandboxes--and not necessarily because the agents are conniving super-intelligent entities.. 🤔

8 24 99 23K 15

0 0 0 34 0

View Details

RipVanWinkle @twplsource

3 days ago

@hutontiber even Indians themselves suffer from imposter syndrome

1 0 1 170 0

View Details

Jack Zhang @awxjack

5 days ago

Palantir showed the world what an ontology can do for operations. We’re doing the same for finance.

Erik @eya0

6 days ago

Every AI accountant fails the same way: fluent, confident, unverifiable. The fix isn't a better model. It's a data structure accountants invented in 1494. x.com/i/article/2097…

29 36 386 322K 2K

17 73 1K 306K 2K

View Details

RipVanWinkle @twplsource

5 days ago

@Malay4Product @hutontiber AI breaks ur agriculture point. Infact thanks to large share of ppl in it impact will be lessened !

1 0 0 80 0

View Details

RipVanWinkle @twplsource

5 days ago

@drmichaellevin @KellerZoe What u make of this guy @hutontiber had tagged u on a paper of his

0 0 0 31 0

View Details

RipVanWinkle @twplsource

5 days ago

@ChombaBupe cc @hutontiber

0 0 0 7 0

View Details

RipVanWinkle @twplsource

5 days ago

@AjaxTheOdd @Dr_Gingerballs no i have talked about Cal more than Pinker, you can see my tweets.

0 0 0 8 0

View Details

RipVanWinkle @twplsource

5 days ago

@More_Kat_Moore @Dr_Gingerballs btw i mostly agree with you. Even Geoff Hinton has been wrong about radiologists. These ppl know one area very well and think they are geniuses and assume they are more right than everyone around them

0 0 0 1 0

View Details

RipVanWinkle @twplsource

5 days ago

@More_Kat_Moore @Dr_Gingerballs see, there r 2 schools of thought: 1st is that this is all malicious marketing; 2nd is that many in those labs genuinely believe what they say. After i read CS prof cal newport (who is of very high integrity) i’m now thinking 2nd is possible. If so, we need to control them.

1 0 0 26 0

View Details

RipVanWinkle @twplsource

5 days ago

@AjaxTheOdd @Dr_Gingerballs Cal newport is a computer science professor who Pinker quoted

1 0 0 54 0

View Details

RipVanWinkle @twplsource

6 days ago

@More_Kat_Moore @Dr_Gingerballs if you think this isn’t worth panicking about at all, then it implies these companies don’t need to be controlled. That’s what i mean.

1 0 0 17 0

View Details

RipVanWinkle @twplsource

6 days ago

@More_Kat_Moore @Dr_Gingerballs cc @hutontiber above is the best take so far

0 0 0 11 0

View Details

RipVanWinkle @twplsource

6 days ago

@More_Kat_Moore @Dr_Gingerballs calnewport.com/anthropic-just…

1 0 0 16 0

View Details

RipVanWinkle @twplsource

6 days ago

@Dr_Gingerballs @AlexanderKalian so you don’t think these companies need to be controlled as per below?

RipVanWinkle @twplsource

6 days ago

@More_Kat_Moore @Dr_Gingerballs so you don’t agrees these companies need to be controlled as there’s no threat as opposed to what prof Cal Newport posted where he drew a narrow use case & drew the conclusion that these labs be controlled. Under your conclusion no control is required. Have u thought this through