MiloEmber @wolfmiloember

@Dragon_griff @Plastibelled Can I have both?

Hey @discord My friend, who is 33, got flagged by your bullshit ass system as being under 18. He has been paying for Nitro for several years, has had his account since 2017, has been in several adult-oriented servers for YEARS, etc. So, I want you to explain to me how the fuck your system can get it that fucking wrong. I have no issues, it rates me as an adult. But for some reason his account gets flagged even though he's older than me? Make it make sense you fucking imbeciles.

@TRIGGERHAPPYV1 Because when those hoses fill, the pressure causes them to go straight. Putting it over the top of the car could actually cause damage to the rig or more damage to the car than just some broken windows.

@Joel_Mustart Yeah. If someone gets to know me and isn't always just talking about sex, I'll probably be more open

@Dragon_griff I mean... you can hide them in my mouth, right?

@Dragon_griff Ngl that's super hot hehe

I'm homosexual. That doesn't mean I have to agree with some political stance simply because I'm homosexual. I'm simply attracted to other biological males. That doesn't mean anything else. Being gay is not a political stance. And yet, the MMIWG2SLGBTQIAPP+ (I'm never letting those fuckers live that down) is constantly trying to make it a political position rather than a sexual orientation. They also seem hell-bent on redefining homosexuality out of existence by making everything about gender identity. It's so homophobic it's insane.

Being gay isn't a "lifestyle" or a "culture." It's a sexual orientation. It's how some brains are wired. Some guys can only like guys. Some ladies can only like ladies. That's it. It's not attached to politics, ideologies, or anything else for that matter.

Age of Consent laws exist. Whether you agree or disagree with them is irrelevant. Many states also have Romeo and Juliet Laws. Pointing out the *legal* side of things is not the same as *condoning* such actions. It is *legal* in some states for a 16 year old to have sex with a 13 year old. Does that make it right? No. The logic behind the laws is fucked up through and through. But unless the laws are overturned, it is perfectly legal in those states. Different states will also have different definitions of what it means to be capable of giving consent. That often plays a role in how the "age of consent" and "Romeo and Juliet" laws are written, or if they are written at all, in the United States. Different countries will also have different laws regarding this. Your insistence on calling everyone who disagrees with your assertion, or who discusses the *legal* aspects of the assertion, as "pedophiles" is concerning. You don't want to contribute to dialogue, you don't want to have an actual discussion, you just want to have your fifteen minutes of fame to pat yourself on the back like the sorry, pathetic worm you so clearly are.

Pedophilia: A sexual attraction to *prepubescent children*. Obviously, sexual activity among minors should always be discouraged. They are not emotionally or mentally capable of handling it maturely. But to call it pedophilia is a massive stretch of the term. You can oppose minor-on-minor sexual activity and not put an incorrect label on it. Minors should not engage in sexual activity, period. They are not prepared for it. But calling it pedophilia is objectively incorrect. A pedophile is someone, typically an adult, who experiences sexual attraction or interest in prepubescent children. A 15 and 16 year old having sex, while potentially harmful, is not pedophilia because neither is a prepubescent child. Does that mean they should be doing it? Absolutely not. Nobody in their right mind thinks they should. It is troublesome when something like this pops up because it is an illogical statement looking to get illogical answers that can be twisted into something else. Do better.

@Dragon_griff Def would suck

@StevenErtelt @JekidoSergal777 "There has never been an archaeological discovery that has contradicted the Bible." There has also never been one that confirms it. Lack of evidence against something is not evidence in favor of it.

@c0mcheck @Bungie Did you not read the article? They literally said they're not done with destiny, and are backing off of the decision to leave it. In other words, unvaulting content is their first step to try to make things right.

Here's something people don't talk about: Most online relationships fail because people rush them. I have an online crush. I've known him for several years. I *could* start saying "I love you" to him, and he could say it to me. But we actively refuse to label what we have as anything past friendship. Why? Because we may be very compatible online, but what if we meet and we find that the dynamic is different? What if that difference ends up ruining the relationship and causes a rift? We'd rather be friends, and meet as friends with the possibility of something more open as a path, and take it if it feels right, than meet assuming everything is dandy only to find out it won't work. There is nothing wrong with meeting someone online if you can verify the person is real. But never, never expect online relationships to work out. Always assume things could end up not working. It's best to remain friends and meet as friends and find it can work and build from there than it is to meet as lovers only to find it won't work.

As an atheist, here is a correction for you: Being a nun is a choice. Nuns elect to take an oath and don that apparel of their own volition. In Islam, hijab is *mandatory* for *all* women. Not wearing it is punishable by imprisonment or, in most cases, torture and death. The attire of a nun represents as specific religious decision. The hijab is a sign of physical *and* spiritual domination. It doesn't take a genius to understand the difference.

Phoenix Atheist @AtheistPhoenix

5 days ago

2K 967 6K 259K 146

@KnottyNitro If you go to MFF, I'll be there... if you're okay with me giving it a try. No expectations, of course ^^

Notice how none of the 'not guilty' jurors need protection? None of the people who supported the left are in any danger. They felt more than comfortable coming forward. Only the one guy who stood against them is threatened. The violence is on one side, and everybody knows it.

LifeNews.com @LifeNewsHQ

5 days ago

Lindsay Clancy Juror Taken to Undisclosed Location to Protect His Safety buff.ly/q3EU6KF

244 527 3K 893K 145

@buckofbucks2 "Differing in some way; odd, strange, weird." "Derogatory term for homosexual." "Queer" will never describe being gay, because it never has been used to describe being gay as anything but a negative.