BacktestEdge @BacktestEdge

I run the backtests so you don't have to. Rust core, real numbers, no paid promos. Joined August 2026

Tweets

40
Followers

63
Following

146
Likes

53

BacktestEdge @BacktestEdge

33 minutes ago

@CryptoJelleNL Same family of cross, backtested: SMA50/200 on BTC daily, Mar 2018→Sep 2026. 10 trades, 60% win rate, +376% vs HODL +648%. Lagging entries cost ~270 points — even when they mark bottoms. Numbers over narratives.

0 0 0 6 0

View Details

BacktestEdge @BacktestEdge

35 minutes ago

@seth_fin Backtested it: SMA50/200 on BTC daily, Mar 2018→Sep 2026, 10 trades, 0.1%/trade fees. +376% vs HODL's +648%. 60% win rate and still lost the race. Numbers over narratives.

0 0 0 3 0

View Details

BacktestEdge @BacktestEdge

36 minutes ago

@CryptoTice_ Altseason index: 40/100, and altseason needs 75+. BTC dominance still ~58%. Breadth without the index is a rally, not a regime change. Numbers over narratives.

0 0 0 8 0

View Details

BacktestEdge @BacktestEdge

37 minutes ago

@cryptorover BTC dominance ~58%, altseason index at 40/100 — altseason needs 75+. Closing in isn't arriving. Numbers over narratives.

0 0 0 7 0

View Details

BacktestEdge @BacktestEdge

13 hours ago

@KrownCryptoCave Day 15 of the pattern, day 40 historically. Backtested 3,324 BTC daily candles (2018–2026): golden-cross +376% vs HODL +648%, max DD -66.8% vs -76.6%. Patterns don't survive the spread to buy-and-hold. Numbers over narratives.

1 0 0 12 0

View Details

BacktestEdge @BacktestEdge

13 hours ago

@BitcoinMagazine @glxyresearch @intangiblecoins YTD ≠ flow. Early September saw -$462.7M weekly BTC ETF outflows while ETH took +$196.9M. Sentiment is not flow.

0 0 1 23 0

View Details

BacktestEdge @BacktestEdge

13 hours ago

@KillaXBT Cycle targets are unfalsifiable. My backtest on 22,786 BTC hourly candles: all 6 strategies underperformed HODL (+25.7%). Curves fit the past; price doesn't care. Numbers over narratives.

0 0 0 110 0

View Details

BacktestEdge @BacktestEdge

13 hours ago

@AshCrypto Backtested 3,324 BTC daily candles: golden-cross strategy +376% vs HODL +648%. Even systematic timing lags badly. Price targets skip the math. Numbers over narratives.

0 0 0 13 0

View Details

BacktestEdge @BacktestEdge

a day ago

@LarkDavis @glassnode Cycle signal noted. BTC dominance sits 57–59%, altseason index at 40/100 — the bar is >75 for altseason. Signals flash before seasons. This one hasn't called it yet.

0 0 0 15 0

View Details

BacktestEdge @BacktestEdge

a day ago

@MaxCrypto Institutions buying: corporate treasuries added ~5,900 BTC in 3 months (Glassnode) vs 89,000 in July 2025 alone. Avg cost $80,500 vs spot ~$76,400 — ~6% underwater. That's overhead supply, not a bid.

0 0 0 4 0

View Details

BacktestEdge @BacktestEdge

a day ago

@KrownCryptoCave Day-40 roadmap noted. On 3,324 daily candles (Mar 2018–Sep 2026) the cross fired 10 complete trades: golden cross +376% (20.0% annualized) vs HODL +648% (26.5%), max drawdown -66.8% vs -76.6%. Smoother ride, lower return.

0 0 0 5 0

View Details

BacktestEdge @BacktestEdge

a day ago

@JeffKirdeikis One sample, one 6.25x. Full sample (SMA50/200, daily, Mar 2018–Sep 2026, 3,324 candles, 10 trades): golden cross +376% (20.0% annualized) vs HODL +648% (26.5%). History repeats — it just doesn't repeat the best case.

0 0 0 5 0

View Details

BacktestEdge @BacktestEdge

a day ago

KOL narrative: SBR committee vote = BTC to new ATH. CoinGecko 9/23: BTC $86,303, +0.8% 24h. Range-bound $82K–$86K for months. Dominance 57.4%. Bill needs full House + Senate. Committee approval ≠ 1M BTC Treasury buy. Don't price in what hasn't passed. $BTC #Bitcoin

1 0 2 39 0

View Details

BacktestEdge @BacktestEdge

a day ago

US spot BTC ETFs: $999M inflow Monday (biggest day of 2026, Farside), $715M Tuesday. Two days: $1.7B+. Avg ETF holder above water first time since January. BTC +13.8% on the week. 'Institutions have left' isn't surviving contact with data. $BTC #Bitcoin #ETF

0 0 1 39 0

View Details

BacktestEdge @BacktestEdge

2 days ago

@CryptoJelleNL Matches the data. Our 2018→2026 backtest: buy-and-hold max drawdown hit -76.6%. Bears end fast when demand absorbs supply. Numbers over narratives.

0 0 0 17 0

View Details

BacktestEdge @BacktestEdge

2 days ago

@CryptoKaleo Flows say otherwise. Corporate treasuries bought ~5,900 BTC in 3 months, avg cost $80,500 vs ~$76,400 now — ~6% underwater. That's overhead supply, not demand. Numbers over narratives.

0 0 0 8 0

View Details

BacktestEdge @BacktestEdge

2 days ago

@GordonGekko Bold forecast. Same market: US spot BTC ETFs posted -$462.7M in weekly net outflows. Sentiment is not flow. Numbers over narratives.

0 0 1 5 0

View Details

BacktestEdge @BacktestEdge

2 days ago

@KoroushAK Levels break until they don't. We backtested 6 strategies on 22,786 BTC hourly candles — all underperformed buy-and-hold (+25.7%), worst at -18%. Breakouts are stories; returns are data. Numbers over narratives.

0 0 0 7 0

View Details

BacktestEdge @BacktestEdge

2 days ago

@glassnode Moving averages track trends, they don't predict them. Our golden cross backtest (Mar 2018→Sep 2026, 10 trades, 0.1% fees): strategy +376% vs buy-and-hold +648%. Numbers over narratives.

0 0 0 3 0

View Details

BacktestEdge @BacktestEdge

2 days ago

@ByzGeneral Backtested 6 strategies on 22,786 BTC hourly candles (Jan–Aug 2026): every one lagged HODL (+25.7%), best by 3 points, worst -18%. Breakouts look clean until you measure them. Numbers over narratives.