Blur Busters @BlurBusters

The Temporal Company: Everything Better Than 60Hz™ Displays-Hz-GtG-MPRT-Lag-VRR-GSYNC-FreeSync-stutters-framerate-120Hz-240Hz-480Hz+ Inventors of https://t.co/6PWhDL4hGu blurbusters.com Toronto/Hamilton, Canada Joined November 2013

Tweets

5K
Followers

6K
Following

3K
Likes

2K

Blur Busters @BlurBusters

a week ago

@UHD4k @RBithrey More like 20,000fps 20,000 Hz (approx) for 16K 180-degrees. Variables include FOV, angular resolution (ppi / ppd), and screen size (bigger = more time to detect imperfections). See blurbusters.com/5000hz for more info.

0 1 5 536 0

View Details

Blur Busters @BlurBusters

a month ago

@luciascarlet @matrixbt Disclaimer: I use a 120Hz MacBook as my cross-platform TestUFO software dev machine. I also have 480-720 Hz OLEDs. One interesting observation is 500 Hz OLED has clearer motion than 1000 Hz LCD. There are eyestrain-reducing ergonomics in browser scrolling on high-Hz OLED.

0 0 1 81 0

View Details

Blur Busters @BlurBusters

a month ago

@luciascarlet @matrixbt One thing I noticed is Apple 60 vs 120 is terrible due to slow LCD GtG. 120 vs 480 OLED is much more noticeable than Apple 60 vs 120 LCD from images at blurbusters.com/120vs480

1 0 1 72 0

View Details

Blur Busters @BlurBusters

a month ago

Ok, there's two PCMR pages on Facebook, and I linked the non-official one. Sorry, @OfficialPCMR. This one is on me. Still, gotta keep mythbusting!

0 0 2 340 0

View Details

Blur Busters @BlurBusters

a month ago

@OfficialPCMR's recent post on Facebook is inaccurate about some sentences posted on their Facebook post at facebook.com/PCMRHUB/posts/… It neglects the new additional scientific variables of the 4x geometric at the bottom of blurbusters.com/120vs480

2 2 7 1K 4

View Details

Blur Busters @BlurBusters

a month ago

@Sebasti66855537 @wccftech I made two replies in the comments that were long replies. However, your system marked my replies as spam, and I lost the work without ability to copy-and-paste my 100% human-written non-AI replies. Would it be possible to restore these two big replies?

0 0 1 42 0

View Details

Blur Busters @BlurBusters

2 months ago

@bullman_brian @Sebasti66855537 @wccftech Capping combined with framegen can be useful, example 4x DLSS capped to 55fps to keep framerates up to (4x55) = 220fps on a 240Hz display. CP2077 supports framegen+capping, but you have to use the pre-framegen cap.

0 0 2 42 0

View Details

Blur Busters @BlurBusters

2 months ago

@bullman_brian @Sebasti66855537 @wccftech Remember the latency yo-yo effect of suddenly increased latency of suddenly lower frame rates during complex game scenes? This is for the higher fps: The capping avoids the (minor) latency yo-yo effect of VRR framerates repeating hitting/retreating from max Hz.

1 0 1 48 0

View Details

Blur Busters @BlurBusters

2 months ago

@bullman_brian @Sebasti66855537 @wccftech If you want to use VRR in esports, the rule is to purchase way more refresh rate range than your planned framerate range. This lets framerates organically breathe in the VRR range without always being forced to the pick-poison compromises of capping.

0 0 1 50 0

View Details

Blur Busters @BlurBusters

2 months ago

@bullman_brian @Sebasti66855537 @wccftech Yes; depends on use case. VRR -> Purpose of capping is to avoid a worse latency caused by framerates hitting VSYNC eSports VSYNC OFF -> You can get lower lag by uncapping, though slight capping (2xHz or 3xHz) to prevent 100% CPU/GPU for input-loop starvation purposes

2 0 1 66 0

View Details

Blur Busters @BlurBusters

3 months ago

@accuaro @skeletonwizar @METAPCs Driver-based approaches are also an alternative too. It would be a free upgrade for @AMDRadeon @NVIDIAGeForce @IntelGaming if they decide to implement a driver hook.

0 0 0 38 0

View Details

Blur Busters @BlurBusters

3 months ago

Technically possible but super expensive if they do it the "Status Quo" way. They'd have to really upgrade the display processing to be able to do it properly and that could represent engineering cost for really botique custom chip. Currently, it is It's very expensive via scaler/TCON ASICs, so a more flexible approach by using a GPU built into the display, as suggested. I never say "realistically impossible" but most wouldn't pay 2-3x more for a display. That's why I think displays need optional GPU-based video processing instead of scaler/TCON ASIC/FPGA video processing, to dramatically reduce the cost of engineering display enhancement algorithms.

1 0 1 47 0

View Details

Blur Busters @BlurBusters

3 months ago

@accuaro @skeletonwizar @METAPCs If you mean CRT electron beam simulator built into OLEDs, that will be difficult. The easiest way is currently BYOA (Bring Your Own Algorithm), like apps such as ShaderBeam. See Blur Busters Open Source Display Shaders Initiative blurbusters.com/open-source-di…

1 0 0 44 0

View Details

Blur Busters @BlurBusters

4 months ago

@NateTate20 @Vincent_Teoh @ASUS_ROG Blind study variables (non-game use case of 480 Hz) blurbusters.com/120vs480 I'm in 50 papers

0 0 0 228 0

View Details

Blur Busters @BlurBusters

4 months ago

@konigssohne @Aerobrake77 @mdrejhon Strobelight only works the custom 2012-era DRM protocol that LightBoost used. It won't work on newer protocols of newer strobe backlights like G-SYNC Pulsar. GSYNC Pulsar lets you strobe non-NVIDIA sources in non-VRR ULMB2 mode. Good for 60 Hz single strobe from HDMI sources.

1 0 2 223 0

View Details

Blur Busters @BlurBusters

4 months ago

@skeletonwizar @METAPCs I also invented the CRT electron beam simulator testufo.com/crt Make your 240 Hz OLED emulate a 60 Hz CRT with less motion blur than the OLED's built-in boilerplate 50% BFI.

2 0 2 74 0

View Details

Blur Busters @BlurBusters

4 months ago

@mrbusysky @METAPCs Correct. But I also have a different study, with different variables (2D scrolling instead of 3D games), 120 Hz vs 480 Hz was more visible than 60 Hz vs 120 Hz. Blind study variables: blurbusters.com/120vs480#blind…

0 0 1 131 0

View Details

Blur Busters @BlurBusters

4 months ago

@ChrisAPofahl @METAPCs No lie. It's aggregate effects of frame rate. But it's also better need to compare 4x differences at GtG=0, rather than slow 60-vs-120. There's effects where 120vs480 is like 1/120sec shutter vs 1/480sec shutter. Compare big differences, like Hz version of 480p vs 2160p.

0 0 0 67 0

View Details

Blur Busters @BlurBusters

4 months ago

@BOLDBANGER314 @METAPCs There's some projections by ~2035-2040 where it's hard to get less than 240Hz. Much like it's easier to get 4K than 720p. There's plan to make 240 Hz cheaper than 60 Hz. First screenful of Amazon search "computer monitors" has no 60 Hz monitor (extinct now)