miseRy @CSafetyfirst

respect. use your cortex. and fkn embrace good solutions. Joined April 2021

Tweets

315
Followers

29
Following

458
Likes

785

miseRy @CSafetyfirst

2 years ago

@blockrotator Seriously? This is nothing to take pride of or make sound like an achievement.

0 0 0 14 0

View Details

miseRy @CSafetyfirst

2 years ago

@LieroPepega @blockrotator Make that 3 years

0 0 0 33 0

View Details

Manifold Finance @foldfinance

2 years ago

Splitting the Block presentation at #Ethcc2024 docs.xga.com

1 8 40 3K 5

View Details

miseRy @CSafetyfirst

2 years ago

@__lostin__ @edison0xyz @coingecko Yeah but what's the return?

0 0 0 12 0

View Details

miseRy @CSafetyfirst

2 years ago

@Crypto_Sydney @edison0xyz @coingecko lol what return are you even talking about? :D

0 0 0 3 0

View Details

miseRy @CSafetyfirst

2 years ago

@foldfinance When we partition blocks, we split them in alpha and beta segments.

0 0 1 136 0

View Details

hildobby @hildobby

2 years ago

interesting stuff @foldfinance src: ethresear.ch/t/preconfirmat…

1 15 43 11K 11

1 2 13 786 0

View Details

No, searcher reliance on builder integration is the problem: give searchers the ability to include their bundles and you get a more competitive market. docs.xga.com not only enables searcher to do this it lets them use contract based bidding eliminating latency wars

Jon Charbonneau 🇺🇸 @jon_charb

2 years ago

This is the current reality: - Validator centralization is NOT a problem - Relay/builder centralization IS a problem We keep doing things in service of the former, at expense of latter This is detrimental when the former is unable to enforce CR & it’s unclear if/when they will

9 12 120 22K 46

0 2 10 847 0

View Details

block rotator @blockrotator

2 years ago

@AFDudley0 @lobstermindset Pre confirmation is not my choice of semantics. However Forward Contract with Embedded Volumetric Optionality doesn’t quite roll off the tongue

1 1 8 203 0

View Details

miseRy @CSafetyfirst

2 years ago

@fabgenovese @phildaian My point but with more clarity. Thanks

0 0 1 50 0

View Details

miseRy @CSafetyfirst

2 years ago

@CryptoGrills Just mind though that the system can't cater to your path by design and it's not for many. So don't hold it against them. They did what they understood and also what they are required to do to make the majority function.

0 0 1 28 0

View Details

miseRy @CSafetyfirst

2 years ago

@phildaian @_charlienoyes Agreed. And therefore we should look at smarter solutions that keep the Alpha Block available for realtime auctions and split off the Beta Block for preconfs and forward contracts. Get the best of both worlds without the misery. XGA is worth a look.

0 0 1 177 0

View Details

miseRy @CSafetyfirst

2 years ago

@0x94305 This way MEV can stay based on realtime auctions but you get all the benefits of physical preconfs for builders / non-searchers.

0 0 1 18 0

View Details

miseRy @CSafetyfirst

2 years ago

@0x94305 And this is why future blockspace markets make sense only if you are auctioning off part of the block and not the whole one. Check XGA.com

1 0 3 101 0

View Details

miseRy @CSafetyfirst

2 years ago

@_charlienoyes @0x94305 You are spot on with your thoughts. And it's important to create awareness for this risk, so thanks for beating the drum. Mind the basic assumption is that entire blocks need to be auctioned off for preconfs. But there are smarter approaches out there.

0 0 1 96 0

View Details

miseRy @CSafetyfirst

2 years ago

@_charlienoyes You will not have multi block MEV if you avoid entire-block-auctions. Instead only auction the (mostly) app/builder part (beta) and leave the top for searchers. It's possible and even live on ETH mainnet right now. Check docs.xga.com

0 3 17 207 0

View Details

miseRy @CSafetyfirst

2 years ago

@_charlienoyes @_charlienoyes you can solve the L1 app hospitality with pre-confirmations without negative/extra Multi-Block MEV implications by not auctioning the entire block but splitting it and only auctioning the alpha part. Check docs.xga.com - a lightweight low risk solution

0 2 16 89 0

View Details

miseRy @CSafetyfirst

2 years ago

@HighRiskSzn @Hirnschluckauf Nicht dafür 😀

0 0 0 50 0

View Details

miseRy @CSafetyfirst

2 years ago

@HighRiskSzn @Hirnschluckauf Die ist klar, dass du eine plausible Erklärung bekommen würdest, wenn du dir die Mühe machen würdest zu recherchieren, right? Schätze aber die Entscheidung stattdessen ein Aluhut Wutbürger zu sein ist besse für die Komfortzone.