☕️ @coffee

:) Joined March 2007

Tweets

6K
Followers

4K
Following

3K
Likes

193K

☕️ @coffee

3 hours ago

@lonnyk @GergelyOrosz drive more impact faster

0 0 0 3 0

View Details

@LightsSpace @TheCoinCollect8 @jakemintz @Suhail another researcher at a big three lab reporting for duty I’m gonna go ahead and say the quiet part out loud here - it’s actually a million times worse. get your affairs in order, trust me

1 0 27 889 2

View Details

Helion @Helion_Energy

6 hours ago

How do semiconductors power fusion? Director of Engineering Manav Singh explains how Helion is reengineering SCRs (thyristors) to shape, compress, and recover energy from fusion plasmas.

4 16 93 5K 18

View Details

☕️ @coffee

2 days ago

@hoshizorarock it's just a basic water substitute, nothing more, nothing less both I and (apparently) my plants have a taste for it - it gets the job done!

0 0 2 95 0

View Details

Autism Capital 🧩 @AutismCapital

2 days ago

Apparently there’s a patch for the critical PHP vulnerabilities but a few things that are alarming. 1) Many websites that use php with sensitive information are simply abandoned. There will be no upgrade. That means they’re going to get pwned and leaked. That’s a LOT of the internet 2) This requires active participants to upgrade their sites that even know about this vulnerability. If you’re on X you’re at the tip of the tip of the spear. Most people don’t know about this. 3) Anthropic says that this is ONE of SEVERAL critical vulnerabilities that they have found. Which means there’s more chaos coming. TLDR: A large portion of the unmaintained internet is about to be pwned and god help us all or something like that.

OpenAI @OpenAI

2 days ago

OpenAI models helped researchers—operating as part of our Patch the Planet initiative—discover critical security flaws in PHP, an open-source programming language used to run an estimated 70% of websites. Over the past two months, we led a coalition of maintainers, researchers,

615 3K 14K 5.8M 4K

99 285 3K 491K 816

View Details

☕️ @coffee

4 days ago

@vanillaopinions he barely won

5 0 317 13K 2

View Details

☕️ @coffee

4 days ago

@hauntedbottom that isn’t a real person

1 0 4 106 0

View Details

☕️ @coffee

a week ago

@stillman_steve u

0 0 5 353 0

View Details

☕️ @coffee

a week ago

no one: absolutely no one: mkbhd: I can’t wait to do this in a school zone

0 0 8 378 0

View Details

☕️ @coffee

a week ago

first date idea

Sam D'Amico @sdamico

a week ago

tl;dr: looks like an off the shelf ESP32 module w/ microphone add-on board, plugged in over USB to the back of a conference room TV

9 4 115 7K 14

0 0 1 226 0

View Details

☕️ @coffee

2 weeks ago

punted my best pool of the weekend

0 0 3 190 0

View Details

☕️ @coffee

2 weeks ago

@TheElliottSmith @TheStalwart perhaps even empowered by poetic technology

1 0 1 57 0

View Details

wukko @uwukko

2 weeks ago

LE CHATON FAT IS REAL

Mistral AI @MistralAI

2 weeks ago

Meet Mistral Large 4, aka Le Chonk. • 1T parameters, natively multimodal. 49B active. It is the best open weights model from US or Europe on aggregated benchmarks. • State-of-the-art on critical workloads, including cyber defense, manufacturing and finance and it surpasses

2K 5K 41K 5.7M 7K

14 34 2K 40K 85

View Details

☕️ @coffee

3 weeks ago

@SaffronOlive I think you have to take a long-term view. Sometimes you’re dealt AA and sometimes you’re dealt 72o, but no one would argue that NLH isn’t extremely skill intensive or rewarding for skilled players. That the pairs extend the range of pools for this format is a fair observation.

0 0 1 1K 0

View Details

☕️ @coffee

3 weeks ago

@Chord_O_Calls stock up ➡️ food replenishment x.com/yuyan_mtg/stat…

Yuya Hosokawa @yuyan_mtg

3 weeks ago

今のスタンダードなので相手のデッキがタブレット系の啓示コントロールのミラーと仮定します。 2枚あるなら打ち消した方が良いです。 1枚なら通します。ただし自分の手札に食糧補充などがあって次のターンにカウンターが構えられないのなら、1枚しかなくても消してしまいます。以下軽い解説。

1 18 99 28K 31

0 0 3 1K 0

View Details

☕️ @coffee

3 weeks ago

@MoscatoAdriano you people are sick

0 0 1 349 0

View Details

☕️ @coffee

4 weeks ago

@nxd1979 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classic_b…

0 0 0 391 1

View Details

Christianity On The Spectrum @ChristianityOn

4 weeks ago

Finally some fresh takes I've never seen before

✝️🇺🇸 The Intern 🌐🔆 @EiratheIntern

4 weeks ago

I think I changed my mind on homosexuality (and all sexuality) being a sin. I think *only* bisexuality is a sin. A homosexual does not "lie with a man *as with* a woman." Notably, marital bisexuality is functionally (ergo by nature) monosexual.

120 149 3K 1.6M 898

42 2K 36K 1.2M 2K

View Details

Daniel Rosiak @DanRosiak

4 weeks ago

No, but listen, you know this "put the fries in the bag, Terence Tao"'--*sniff, sniff*--already the usual replies concede too much. "If Tao is serving fries, YOU will be in the lithium mines." My God! This is our defense of human dignity? Don’t worry, the correct people will get the terrible jobs! *Pulls at shirt* You see, everything is up for radical transformation, human intelligence, consciousness, and so on and so on--except that somebody must still have a shitty afternoon so I can enjoy my lunch. But to say "these people are envious", this is too easy. It allows us, "the educated ones," our own little fantasy: we are disliked only because we are so wonderful. You know, the more interesting thing is this *sniff* peculiar identification with the machine. When the mathematician discovers something, apparently this was HIS achievement, his privilege, his little secret. When the machine discovers something, suddenly it's "Look what WE can do!" The achievement has become collective precisely at the moment when no human being can claim credit. See how this "we" functions. For the achievement, I identify with the machine. For the consequences, I identify YOU with the human. "We have surpassed you." Who are we? Well, myself and the thing that has also surpassed me. There is something almost touching here, really. To escape the humiliation of somebody absorbed in something opaque to you, you appeal to something which knows incomparably more than either of you. And this is supposed to settle the matter in YOUR favor. You know the old example of canned laughter. Here we have a similar arrangement. The machine achieves something on my behalf. The mathematician suffers the loss of human significance on my behalf. Somebody to be brilliant for me and somebody to be obsolete for me, without me having to be either, so I can remain as I was. But *pulls on shirt* there is this little difficulty that hides the essential thing: you still need a response from Tao! A correct proof, this Lean slop and so on, is not enough. You need him to certify his own defeat. You need him to say "By god, this is extraordinary! Yes, this is correct, but also this is interesting." Which means--and here comes Hegel--the person you are reducing to an obedient instrument must remain more than an obedient instrument. You need recognition from someone whose authority you are abolishing. "Your so-called expertise is worthless. Now tell me, in your expert opinion, that I, qua machine representative, was right." *Touches nose* But I would go a step further. What does this math person actually do to provoke you? In the fantasy, I mean. He need not insult you. He can be generous, mild-mannered, whatever. Something remains irritating: there is something over there which occupies him, which matters to him, and your opinion does not settle what it is worth. Perhaps he is not even looking down on you. This is the really intolerable possibility. This, you see, is closer to the Lacanian problem of the Other's desire. Not simply "What does he have that I don't?" but "What the hell is going on with him?" Perhaps the answer is: he is thinking about something else. The fries solve this beautifully. Now you know what you are for him. He needs the money. Your presence creates an obligation. And this, at last, also explains why the machine can be less threatening than the mathematician. The machine's intelligence may exceed yours unimaginably, but you imagine it arrives in response to your prompt. You can complain about the tone. You have the privileges of an angry customer and so on and so on. The human has this irritating possibility of being interested in something you did not request and cannot order. And please, this includes the person already serving the fries! *Pulls at shirt* I am almost tempted to say: the dream of unlimited intelligence conceals just this: a the wish that nobody should be doing anything you cannot immediately understand as a service.