Raj Interlink @Rajinterlink

Bang.......hi scammer gand.....u

Arif Ahmed Core Ambassador | Interlink Labs @ArifAhmedITL

16 hours ago

🚀 A NEW CHAPTER FOR INTERLINK IS APPROACHING! 🌐💜 Exciting times are ahead for the entire InterLink community! 🔥 The upcoming major event is expected to bring two important milestones: the opening of KYC for the ITLG Mainnet and the celebration of InterLink’s new office in

3 4 29 541 0

She is the number 1 harami Ye din mai kuch or hai or raat mai kuch or @Aruna201206 @reina_itl @kv_interlinkITL @JTodupunuri @rahulsai_k @MaddiSwath12192 @DhirajK26126238 @thesachinbhatt @interlinklabsas @MaheshMagnus1

Am I looking good ? @Aruna201206 @kv_interlink @bhanupr29988340 @JTodupunuri

Hi kv's do.....g

Theo2Pi @theo2pi

a month ago

First 10M Linkers, head to the app now and claim your exciting rewards from InterLink!🎁 #InterLink #ITL #ITLG #WeAreTheFirst10M celebrate10musers.interlinklabs.ai

1 0 0 157 0

Look at his fuc......g face Chusa hua aam

Arif Ahmed Core Ambassador | Interlink Labs @ArifAhmedITL

16 hours ago

🚀 A NEW CHAPTER FOR INTERLINK IS APPROACHING! 🌐💜 Exciting times are ahead for the entire InterLink community! 🔥 The upcoming major event is expected to bring two important milestones: the opening of KYC for the ITLG Mainnet and the celebration of InterLink’s new office in

3 4 29 541 0

@ArifAhmedITL @kv_interlink Ready to suck his dic....k

This guy is so dumb I don't know how he even a core ambassador Anyway he is ambassador in bunch of other projects also .He is a piece of shi...t for sure. Maybe once he have a baby he will tell his wife that is @Digitalgold1979 son @kv_interlink

Arif Ahmed Core Ambassador | Interlink Labs @ArifAhmedITL

13 hours ago

@theo2pi @0Linker @inter_link @ANetworkLLC @kv_interlink Max Stone That guy is Digital gold from A Network He is A Network CEO and this idiot don't have brain

5 0 1 123 0

@ArifAhmedITL @theo2pi @0Linker @inter_link @ANetworkLLC @kv_interlink Dala bharwa harami chootiya

@theo2pi @Ex3trim @VyxCrypto629 This guy is a waste a trash can He been wasting his time

@theo2pi @VyxCrypto629 It is a waste of time project the SCAMMER have move on to another project x.com/_dellaayunda/s…

𝐑𝐀 𝐃𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐚 𝐀𝐲𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐚 @_dellaayunda

a day ago

⚠️WARNING Interlink Labs Dan Sible Network Kedua proyek ini dimiliki @kv_interlink dan dia sedang mencoba menjauh dari @inter_link dan membuat orang-orang bergabung dengan @SibleNetworkAI sehingga mereka bisa terus memanen iklan dan menipu komunitas polos ini. 🚨

44 23 128 8K 10

@theo2pi @0Linker @inter_link @ANetworkLLC @kv_interlink Yes mot.....fuc.....er French onion Kv's son shut up

@ArifAhmedITL @theo2pi @0Linker @inter_link @ANetworkLLC @kv_interlink Madar ch.....d gand,,,,u shool Gaya WhatsApp mai bheek mangta tha apney baap se Kal Tera bacha bhi paida ho ga tu boley ga ye Digital Gold ka Hai Hara.....mi chusey huey aam

@theo2pi @ArifAhmedITL @0Linker @inter_link @ANetworkLLC @kv_interlink Fu.... u stinky French onion Don't forget to tell us got scammed in itl group

Linkers are blaming me but interlink’s own ambassadors are posting against @inter_link . It’s not my fault and under his post other ambassador is begging to delete it . He is saying over 1.5 Trillion $ITLG are mined so far . @Crypto_A_A @web3scraphunt

Hello 👋 How many of you think that these 4 pictures are of the same guy 😂 😂 😂 No Ai used 😂 😂 😂 CEO of @SibleNetworkAI @chrisP_sible In fact the guy on left is Dr Chris Mullen chrismullen.org

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

🚨 YOU WANT FACTS? LET’S TALK FACTS. Nobody needs an X location label to question InterLink. You wrote an entire essay defending a location label while completely ignoring the questions that actually matter. Let me make this simple. Where is InterLink’s publicly verifiable blockchain? Where is the block explorer showing the $ITLG people have supposedly mined? Can users independently verify their mining rewards and transactions on-chain? How much $ITLG has been distributed so far, and where is the verifiable record? Who controls the token supply, and how can the community independently audit it? Where is the independently verifiable evidence supporting the project’s claims? You say, “Let the work speak for itself.” EXACTLY. Then show us the work. A mobile application is not proof of a functioning blockchain. A mining counter is not proof of on-chain assets. Millions of registered users are not proof of decentralization. And calling people “bad eggs” doesn’t answer a single technical question. I don’t care whether a project operates from America, Vietnam, India, or anywhere else. BLOCKCHAIN DOESN’T HAVE A NATIONALITY. IT HAS VERIFIABLE RECORDS. If InterLink is building something legitimate, answering these questions with evidence should strengthen its credibility. Stop defending personalities. Start demanding transparency. DON’T TRUST ME. DON’T TRUST KV. VERIFY. #InterLink #ITLG #Blockchain #Crypto

Digital Striver @Digital_Striver

3 days ago

🚨 “InterLink Is a Scam!” ❌ 🚨 “Stop Mining $ITLG!” ❌ 🚨 “You Are Wasting Your Time!” ❌ This is what some shallow-minded individuals are saying simply because X now shows @inter_link's account location as Southeast Asia instead of the United States. First and foremost,

61 18 126 16K 7

INTERLINK NETWORK — 100 QUESTIONS THAT DESERVE ANSWERS MILLIONS OF USERS. BILLIONS OF TOKENS. 100 QUESTIONS. InterLink has attracted millions of participants who have invested their time mining $ITLG, completing tasks, inviting friends, and building communities. Some have spent months participating. Others have invested more than a year of their time. These people deserve transparency. I am an independent researcher. I do not own InterLink, and I am not here to attack its community or accuse its leadership of wrongdoing. I believe that when a project reaches millions of users, the standard of accountability must rise alongside its growth. These questions are intended to establish facts, clarify public claims, and identify independently verifiable evidence. 100 QUESTIONS. NO PERSONAL ATTACKS. JUST ACCOUNTABILITY. ⸻ PART 1 — BLOCKCHAIN & INFRASTRUCTURE 1. Where is InterLink’s public blockchain? 2. Is InterLink operating its own Layer 1 blockchain, using another blockchain, or maintaining user balances in a centralized database? 3. Where is the official blockchain explorer? 4. What is the chain ID, and where can users verify it? 5. Can users independently verify their mined $ITLG on-chain? 6. Can InterLink publish a verifiable transaction showing $ITLG being mined, distributed, or transferred? 7. Who operates the network’s validator nodes? 8. How many active validators does InterLink currently have? 9. Is the blockchain independently operational, or does it depend entirely on infrastructure controlled by the InterLink team? 10. Has InterLink’s blockchain infrastructure undergone an independent security audit? PART 2 — $ITLG SUPPLY & MINING 11. How many $ITLG tokens have been mined since the project started? 12. How many $ITLG tokens are currently recorded in users’ accounts? 13. How many $ITLG tokens have actually been minted on-chain? 14. What is the difference between $ITLG displayed inside the application and tokens existing on a blockchain? 15. With millions of participants mining daily, what is the estimated total $ITLG accumulated across the entire community? 16. How many $ITLG tokens have been migrated, and how many remain unmigrated? 17. What independently verifiable records support InterLink’s published user and mining statistics? 18. Can InterLink publish a complete supply breakdown covering mined, migrated, burned, locked, and circulating $ITLG? 19. If mining rewards are recorded in a centralized system, when and how will those balances become independently verifiable? PART 3 — $ITL TOKENOMICS & DISTRIBUTION 20. What is the exact relationship between $ITLG and $ITL? 21. How many $ITL tokens have been created? 22. How many $ITL tokens have already been distributed? 23. Which blockchain wallet addresses are responsible for distributing $ITL? 24. Can the community independently verify all $ITL distribution transactions? 25. What percentage of $ITL is allocated to the team, investors, ecosystem, community, and treasury? 26. What are the vesting schedules and unlock conditions for team and investor allocations? 27. Who controls the wallets holding undistributed $ITL? 28. Can InterLink publish an independently verifiable circulating-supply report? PART 4 — BURNING, MIGRATION & CONVERSION 29. InterLink has discussed token burning. Where are the verifiable burning transactions? 30. How many $ITLG or $ITL tokens have actually been burned? 31. Were these tokens permanently destroyed on-chain, or were balances simply adjusted in an internal system? 32. What determines the conversion ratio between $ITLG and $ITL? 33. Can InterLink publish the exact mathematical formula used to calculate conversions? 34. Who has authority to modify conversion rates, migration rules, or token allocations? 35. Can the team demonstrate that migrated balances reconcile with the original mining records? 36. Has an independent third party audited the migration and conversion process? PART 5 — KYC, BIOMETRICS & USER DATA 37. Why does InterLink require multiple stages of KYC? 38. If one KYC stage is sufficient for $ITLG, why are additional verification stages required for $ITL? 39. What specific purpose does each KYC stage serve? 40. Which company processes users’ biometric and facial-recognition information? 41. Where is biometric information stored, and which jurisdictions govern that storage? 42. Does InterLink retain facial images, biometric templates, or both? 43. Can users permanently delete their biometric data, and how is deletion verified? 44. Has InterLink completed independent privacy and security assessments of its identity-verification system? 45. Is biometric data shared with any third parties, and can users review those disclosures? PART 6 — GOOGLE, OKX & PARTNERSHIP CLAIMS 46. Has Google or any Google-affiliated investment entity made a direct financial investment in InterLink? 47. If such an investment exists, can InterLink provide an official announcement or other verifiable evidence? 48. Does InterLink’s relationship with Google involve investment, cloud infrastructure, developer services, or another arrangement? 49. What exactly did the publicly discussed OKX handshake represent? 50. Was it an exchange-listing agreement, formal partnership, business meeting, or informal introduction? 51. Has OKX independently confirmed the nature of its relationship with InterLink? 52. Can InterLink clearly distinguish confirmed commercial partnerships from technical integrations, applications, meetings, and promotional appearances? PART 7 — COMPANY, OWNERSHIP & LEADERSHIP 53. What is the complete legal name of the company operating InterLink? 54. In which country is the company incorporated, and what is its official registration number? 55. Who are the ultimate beneficial owners of the company? 56. Where are InterLink’s registered and operational offices in the United States, Singapore, Vietnam, and Hong Kong, where applicable? 57. Who has legal authority over the project’s treasury, token contracts, and infrastructure? 58. What are the official roles, responsibilities, and compensation arrangements of the project’s senior leadership? PART 8 — FINANCIAL TRANSPARENCY & ACCOUNTABILITY 59. How is InterLink financing its operations, development, infrastructure, and marketing? 60. Has InterLink raised outside capital, and if so, what funding amounts and investors can be publicly verified? 61. Has the project undergone an independent financial, smart-contract, or token-reserve audit, and where are the reports? 62. What specific deliverables, timelines, and measurable conditions must be met before users can independently hold, transfer, or trade their tokens? 63. Will InterLink publish the documents, wallet addresses, blockchain records, audit reports, and official confirmations necessary for its community to verify these claims independently? PART 9 — BITFLIP, BITCOIN PRICE PREDICTIONS & GAMBLING REGULATIONS BITFLIP: A BITCOIN PREDICTION GAME, A BETTING PLATFORM, OR A REGULATED FINANCIAL PRODUCT? 64. What is the exact legal structure under which InterLink operates BitFlip, the Bitcoin price-prediction game involving $ITL tokens? 65. Is BitFlip legally classified as a skill-based prediction game, chance-based game, gambling product, financial derivative, or another type of regulated activity? 66. When users predict whether Bitcoin’s price will rise or fall, are they risking or staking $ITL tokens, and can they lose those tokens if their predictions are incorrect? 67. If users can win additional $ITL through successful Bitcoin price predictions, has InterLink obtained legal opinions addressing gambling, betting, financial derivatives, and applicable cryptocurrency regulations? 68. Which registered legal entity owns and operates BitFlip, and in which jurisdiction is that entity incorporated? 69. Does BitFlip require gambling, betting, gaming, financial-services, or derivatives-related licenses in any country where it is accessible? 70. Has InterLink obtained jurisdiction-specific legal reviews for countries such as India, Indonesia, Vietnam, South Korea, and the United States, where regulations on cryptocurrency wagering and prediction products may differ? 71. Are users required to meet minimum-age and jurisdictional eligibility requirements before participating in BitFlip, and what verification safeguards are implemented? 72. Which Bitcoin price feed determines whether a prediction wins or loses, who controls the settlement mechanism, and are outcomes and $ITL payouts independently auditable? 73. If users risk $ITL to predict Bitcoin price movements and receive token rewards for correct predictions, what measures ensure BitFlip complies with applicable gambling laws, financial regulations, consumer-protection requirements, and app-store policies? PART 10 — AMBASSADORS, INDEPENDENT APPS & ACCOUNTABILITY WHO IS REALLY OPERATING THE INTERLINK ECOSYSTEM? 74. Are InterLink ambassadors officially authorized to develop, publish, or operate applications using the InterLink name or ecosystem? 75. Which applications are owned by InterLink itself, and which are independently owned by ambassadors or third-party developers? 76. Can InterLink publish a verified list of officially approved applications, their operators, and their legal entities? 77. Do ambassadors running applications have written commercial agreements, licenses, or revenue-sharing arrangements with InterLink? 78. Are ambassadors allowed to collect user information, wallet details, biometric information, or other personal data through their applications? 79. Who is legally responsible if an ambassador-operated application experiences a data breach, financial loss, or security incident? 80. Are ambassador-operated applications subject to independent security audits and privacy reviews before being promoted to the community? 81. Can ambassadors independently introduce paid features, advertisements, token rewards, or financial incentives using InterLink branding? 82. What oversight mechanisms prevent conflicts of interest when ambassadors simultaneously promote InterLink and operate applications that generate revenue or rewards? 83. If an ambassador-operated application violates local laws, app-store policies, or consumer-protection requirements, what responsibility does InterLink accept, and what enforcement procedures are in place? PART 11 — KV’S ROLE, AUTHORITY, COMPENSATION & TOKEN DISTRIBUTION CONTROL KV, IF YOU ARE NOT THE OWNER, WHAT EXACTLY IS YOUR OFFICIAL POSITION? These questions concern the authority exercised by people representing InterLink to its community. They seek clarification of roles and financial interests, not disclosure of private contractual terms or wallet credentials. 84. KV, you have stated that you are not the owner of InterLink. What exactly is your official position — community manager, core team member, ambassador, employee, contractor, or something else? 85. Which legally registered InterLink entity appointed you to that position, and who authorized your appointment? 86. Do you have a signed employment agreement, consulting contract, ambassador agreement, or another formal document defining your responsibilities? 87. Can InterLink publicly confirm your appointment and disclose a redacted document or official statement establishing your authority? 88. If you are helping manage a community reported to have approximately 10 million users, what decisions are you authorized to make independently, and which require approval from company leadership? 89. Are you compensated through a salary, consulting fees, performance bonuses, token rewards, or a combination of these? Can InterLink disclose the compensation structure and relevant aggregate figures? 90. How many $ITLG and $ITL tokens have been allocated to you, directly or through any entity you control, for your official InterLink responsibilities? 91. Are those token allocations subject to vesting, lockups, transfer restrictions, or performance conditions, and can those terms be independently verified? 92. Do you have any financial interest in applications, gaming products, referral programs, or other services promoted to the InterLink community? 93. Who officially supervises your work, evaluates your performance, and holds you accountable for statements or decisions made on behalf of InterLink? 94. Who controls the main $ITL distribution wallets, and which legal entity has ultimate authority over those assets? 95. Who controls the main $ITLG distribution wallets or internal distribution systems, and who can authorize the creation, adjustment, migration, or release of user balances? 96. Are $ITL and $ITLG distribution wallets protected by multisignature authorization, independent oversight, or other documented security controls? How many authorized signers are required? 97. Can InterLink publish the official public addresses of its treasury, distribution, reserve, and token-burning wallets, together with a description of their functions, without exposing private keys or security-sensitive information? 98. What independent audit trails, approval records, and reconciliation procedures exist to ensure that no individual — including KV, founders, administrators, or other core team members — can secretly alter allocations or distribute tokens outside approved rules? PART 12 — THREE MONTHS WITHOUT TOKEN BURNING? WHAT HAPPENED TO THE BURNING MECHANISM? 99. Community members have raised concerns that InterLink’s token-burning mechanism has not been functioning for approximately three months. Can InterLink confirm whether burning was suspended, explain the exact date and reason, identify who authorized any suspension, and publish records showing the last successful burn? 100. If token burning was interrupted for approximately three months, how many $ITLG or $ITL tokens should have been burned during that period, what happened to those tokens instead, and will InterLink publish a complete reconciliation and a verified plan for addressing any outstanding burns? ⸻ MY FINAL MESSAGE Millions of people may have invested something more valuable than money. Their time. Some have spent months mining. Some have invited their families and friends. Some have built entire communities. Some genuinely believe this project could change their financial future. And that is precisely why transparency matters. I am not claiming InterLink is fraudulent. I am not claiming its leadership has done anything illegal. I am asking for evidence. A screenshot is not a blockchain explorer. A handshake is not automatically a partnership. Using Google’s technology is not the same as receiving Google’s investment. An application balance is not automatically an on-chain asset. And a promise is not the same as a completed transaction. A Bitcoin price-prediction game involving tokens that may carry monetary value deserves a clear explanation of its legal classification. That does not automatically make it gambling or illegal. An ambassador operating a third-party application should be transparent about ownership, authorization, and responsibility for users. And someone exercising authority over a community of millions should be able to explain their official role, who appointed them, and the boundaries of their responsibilities. If the infrastructure exists, show it. If the tokens were distributed, show the transactions. If tokens were burned, show the burn records. If investments were made, show the evidence. If partnerships were signed, clarify their actual scope. If BitFlip operates legally, explain its regulatory framework and settlement mechanisms. If ambassadors operate independent applications, disclose who owns and controls them. If someone represents InterLink in an official capacity, confirm their authority and disclose relevant financial conflicts. If distribution wallets hold community assets, identify their public addresses and explain the controls protecting them. If the burning mechanism has been inactive for three months, explain why and account for the tokens affected. A legitimate project should welcome reasonable questions and provide verifiable answers wherever possible. 100 QUESTIONS. MILLIONS OF USERS. BILLIONS OF TOKENS. THE COMMUNITY DESERVES ANSWERS. The questions are public. The responsibility to substantiate public claims belongs to those making them. This investigation is about transparency, accountability, and the time millions of people have invested. @Crypto_A_A @web3scraphunt #InterLink #ITLG #ITL #BitFlip #Blockchain #CryptoTransparency #CryptoResearch @Crypto_A_A @web3scraphunt

KV @kv_interlink

4 days ago

For nearly the past year, a lot of false information has been spread about InterLink by people from other smaller projects or those who want to gain engagement by constantly linking InterLink’s name to negative matters and manipulating the community through negative narratives

1K 1K 3K 108K 188

🚨 DID GOOGLE REALLY INVEST $1 MILLION IN INTERLINK? GOOGLE CLOUD CREDITS? CASH INVESTMENT? OR SOMETHING ELSE? InterLink has publicly promoted Google for Startups as an investor. But does that mean Google actually invested $1 MILLION in cash? Let’s examine the evidence. A research thread. 🧵👇 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 1/ WHAT DOES GOOGLE ACTUALLY OFFER STARTUPS? Google for Startups Cloud Program offers qualifying companies: ☁️ Up to $200,000 in Google Cloud credits. 🤖 Up to $350,000 in credits for eligible AI startups. These are infrastructure credits. They are NOT cash investments. Official Google sources: cloud.google.com/startup cloud.google.com/startup/ai cloud.google.com/startup/benefi… ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 2/ DOES GOOGLE INVEST REAL MONEY? YES. Google has supported startups through separate funding initiatives. Google for Startups Founders Funds have provided cash awards to selected founders. However, these programs are separate from Google Cloud credits. Receiving startup benefits does not automatically mean Google purchased equity in your company. Official source: startup.google.com/programs/found… ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 3/ CAN GOOGLE INVEST $1 MILLION OR MORE? YES. Google and its investment entities can invest millions of dollars in companies. But Google’s standard startup cloud credits program is NOT a $1 million cash investment program. An actual investment would involve a separate financing arrangement. Official Google FAQ: cloud.google.com/startup/faq ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 4/ NOW LET’S TALK ABOUT INTERLINK. On June 15, 2025, InterLink published an announcement claiming a strategic investment from Google for Startups. However, the announcement did not disclose the exact investment amount. Read the announcement: accessnewswire.com/newsroom/en/pu… MY QUESTION: HOW MUCH DID GOOGLE ACTUALLY INVEST? ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 5/ INTERLINK’S OWN WEBSITE MAKES ANOTHER CLAIM. InterLink has described Google for Startups as an investor and referred to Google as its lead investor. Source: interlinklabs.ai/interlink-blog… But a company’s own announcement does not independently verify the exact amount or nature of an investment. Was it cash? Was it cloud credits? Was it both? ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 6/ WHAT ABOUT THE REPORTED $20 MILLION? Another article on InterLink’s website discusses reports of approximately $20 million in seed funding. It also references Google Cloud credits. Source: interlinklabs.ai/interlink-blog… Now we have several different figures being discussed: 💰 An alleged $1 million Google investment. 💰 Approximately $20 million in reported seed funding. ☁️ Up to $200,000 in Google Cloud credits. These are different financial claims. They should not be presented as interchangeable. WHERE IS THE BREAKDOWN? ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 7/ WHAT DOES INTERLINK’S OFFICIAL WEBSITE SAY? InterLink publicly promotes its relationship with Google for Startups. Official website: interlinklabs.ai Its Google Play listing also references participation in Google for Startups and startup funding. Google Play: play.google.com/store/apps/det… However, participating in a startup program does not, by itself, establish that Google made a cash investment. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8/ HERE ARE MY QUESTIONS FOR INTERLINK. I am not accusing anyone of fraud. I am asking for TRANSPARENCY. 1. Did Google invest $1 million in cash? 2. Which Google legal entity invested? 3. Was it an equity investment, grant, or cloud credits? 4. What was the actual seed funding amount? 5. Is there an official statement from Google confirming the investment? 6. Can InterLink distinguish cash funding from infrastructure credits? 7. If Google is an investor, what exactly is the nature of that investment? These are reasonable questions for a project publicly promoting Google as an investor. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 9/ WHAT CAN WE ACTUALLY VERIFY? Google offers substantial cloud credits to qualifying startups. Google has also supported selected startups through separate cash-funding initiatives. InterLink has publicly claimed an investment relationship with Google for Startups. But the publicly available information discussed here does not independently establish that Google transferred $1 million in cash to InterLink. That does not prove the claim is false. It means the amount and nature of the alleged investment remain unverified. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 10/ FINAL THOUGHT. There is nothing wrong with receiving Google Cloud credits. There is nothing wrong with participating in Google for Startups. And there is nothing wrong with receiving genuine investment. But communities deserve to know the difference. IF GOOGLE INVESTED $1 MILLION, SHOW THE CONFIRMATION. IF GOOGLE PROVIDED CLOUD CREDITS, CALL THEM CLOUD CREDITS. IF BOTH HAPPENED, EXPLAIN BOTH. This is not about attacking a project. This is about accountability and transparency. DON’T TRUST HEADLINES. DON’T TRUST ME EITHER. CHECK THE SOURCES. VERIFY THE CLAIMS. #InterLink #GoogleForStartups #CryptoResearch #Blockchain #Web3 @Crypto_A_A @web3scraphunt @SibleNetworkAI

Interlink labs Big Scam Revealed @inter_link and @SibleNetworkAI @chrisP_sible @kv_interlink @reina_itl They both owned by kv and their ambassadors are eye witness They are making money and now want to run away and leave people with nothing . Be careful guys they registered with agent in USA 🇺🇸 so no one can see their names . @Crypto_A_A @web3scraphunt @inter_link

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next