Refinee AI @RefineeAI

Your merge gate says a second person approved it. It was your coding agent, logged in as you. A fintech startup audited its agent-driven merges before SOC 2. Every merge into main passed the two-person gate. 27% rested only on an approval an agent submitted as the lead. 🧵

Your SOC 2 report covers a window that closed months ago. Since then: new engineers, a new cloud region, two vendors swapped, an AI tool wired into support. None of that is in the report your customer just accepted. Which of those changes would you be comfortable walking them

A vendor security questionnaire does not enforce a single access boundary. Procurement can document controls, but live integrations change. The more consequential question is whether security teams can see what a supplier account actually does after approval. In practical

a 300-question security questionnaire cost my startup two deals. fake startup. played founder mode: b2b saas, bengaluru, ₹15 l savings in. co-founder walked in month 16. still got acquired at month 36. game says my product quality was 38/100. fair. which month killed you?

@eaescob Feels like most TPRM still runs on a questionnaire somebody filled out once a year. Then a vuln drops and nobody can say which vendors actually run the affected thing. If you could start over what would you replace it with?

When attackers can send swarms to test your systems, an annual security questionnaire starts to look like checking the locks once every New Year's Eve. The speed mismatch is the story.

Hot take or inevitable? In 10 years, vendor questionnaires won’t just ask “Are you SOC 2 compliant?” They’ll ask “Which parts of your stack are formally verified?” CompCert and seL4 proved it’s possible. AI might make it affordable.

AI Security Budget: $9M CISO: We need to assess every AI vendor before deployment. CFO: That will slow down innovation. Why not assess only the biggest vendors? CISO: Because the smallest vendor could have access to our most sensitive data. CFO: But they’re just providing an

Fed, FDIC and OCC's 2023 interagency rule ditched fixed checklists for principles — three years on, examiners want banks to justify vendor-risk judgement calls, not just show paperwork. compliancehub.wiki/us-banking-reg…

Day 20 of #CyberMonth2026 🔗 "A completed questionnaire is not the same as assurance." From a @WiCySorg webinar with @Cisco on third-party risk: 📡 Monitor vendors continuously 🔗 Watch fourth-party risk 🧠 Pair automation with human judgment #TPRM #GRC

Your security questionnaire is not a personality test. Stop guessing, answer from evidence you actually have, and close the deal before procurement invents new hobbies. brindleproof-3.polsia.app

You don't need a $200K in-house CISO to pass SOC 2. Seed to Series C companies need security leadership, not necessarily full-time. A fractional CISO builds your program, gets you audit-ready and answers questionnaires from $1,500/month. dlvr.​it/TW0ks1 #vCISO #SOC2

Fine Print #2 Your vendor's SOC 2 might be a template. AICPA peer reviewers now compare a firm's SOC 2 reports side by side when risk looks high. Identical risk assessments, sample sizes and tests = "nonconforming." A badge proves a report exists. Not that an audit happened.

AI Data Leaks And Data Loss Dangers AI can accelerate your business — but it can also accelerate data exposure. When employees use generative AI to analyze documents, summarize information, or automate workflows, sensitive data can cross boundaries that security teams may not

Prediction: within a year, a model list (name, version, host, data flow) becomes a standard line in enterprise security questionnaires, next to your SBOM. Write yours now. It's an afternoon's work today and a deal-blocker later.

SaaS vendors that handle PHI such as telehealth platforms, EHR integrations, diagnostic tools tell customers: "Store your data in your own S3 bucket for HIPAA compliance." This is architecturally sound. The vendor avoids storing PHI. The customer controls their own data. But it

How I'd judge if an enterprise AI product is ready to sell: skip the demo, read its security questionnaire answers. Where does data go? Who does the agent act as? What gets logged? How fast can access be revoked? Those answers decide the deal long before the demo does.

A 104-question security questionnaire came in with some answers already filled. I tried to prove each one from code and infrastructure definitions. Data region, WAF, MFA, encryption and segregation were wrong.