Joe R @RunJoeIT

It wasn’t just “if you like your doctor you can keep your doctor” that was a lie. Just about everything that Obama promised about Obamacare turned out to be a lie.

In Michigan, Barack Obama campaigned for Abdul El-Sayed by denouncing Donald Trump for "deciding to start an unnecessary war that nobody asked for and nobody voted for." I am confused. In 2011, I represented members of Congress who opposed Obama attacking Libya without authorization... jonathanturley.org/2011/06/15/mem…

The biggest tell for me that the election will be secure, is that the Dems are panicking and have been seeding the narrative that Trump is going to steal the election. If the Dems were confident they were going to win, they would currently all be demanding Trump to confirm that he will “accept the results of the upcoming election”. That’s what they did in 2020 when they knew they had their full array of fraud and mass mail-in ballots. However, in 2026, the Dems have not been doing that. They’ve been doing the exact opposite. The Dems have been focusing their messaging on the Trump administration interfering with the results, crying about the potential of federal agents at polling sites, crying about the seizure of ballots and tabulation machines, crying about Trump using foreign interference as a pretext for Executive intervention, etc. The Dems are behaving as if they believe they are going to lose the election. They have already been laying the groundwork to launch the “Trump stole the election” narrative for a while now. That’s why they are so focused on their fake polls, so when they lose, they can say Trump cheated. The Dems are bracing for defeat. Everyone get out and vote, and let’s ensure their defeat is definitive.

Obama, 24 Oct: people "in the highest offices in the land think it's okay to lie and cheat and bully." Obama's own CIA director, John Brennan: "I'm the sole target of these two investigations down in Florida." Obama is describing himself. Lying, cheating and bullying is exactly what his people did to Donald Trump, from 2016 right up to the Mar-a-Lago raid. I have the documents. THE GRAND CONSPIRACY 👉 grandconspiracybook.com

@ElissaSlotkin You're helping to get more voters to vote red.

🚨 JUST IN: In a bombshell statement, Brazil's President of the Superior Electoral Court Justice Kassio Nunes Marques just SOUNDED THE ALARM that there was absolutely NO RULE that allowed the voting to continue an extra +2 hours — an unprecedented order from Lula's Supreme Court flunky that helped his regions "The preliminary decision given after the voting closing time generated DIFFICULTIES in the electoral process...there [were] no regulations authorizing any extension." 🤯 "Never, in the history of the TSE, has there been ANY extension." "It would not be possible, in a few hours, to form a judgment with certainty that no side effects — especially in the technological aspect — arising from a court decision would significantly impact the vote count!" He also pointedly reminded the Supreme Court that the Electoral Justice system is "the institution to which our Constitution attributed the exclusive competence to manage the electoral process" Lula's handpicked justice bypassed the TSE after 5PM and ordered it anyway! EVERYONE SAW THIS and even LULA knows he stole it. This judge is spot-on. Sadly, Brazil is run by socialists and tyrants. The ONLY hope now appears to be annulling the results No more shenanigans. Pray for the success of Bolsonaro and by extension the people of Brazil! 🇧🇷

.@POTUS: "When I see Obama talking about the JCPOA — that may have been the worst and dumbest deal I've ever seen. He gave them billions and billions of cash... He tried to buy his way out of it and they used it to try and create nuclear weapons."

Remember Black America, if you don't vote Democrat, you are either not really Black or sexist, or both.

Dems placing a second Dan Sullivan on the ballot in Alaska (a fake candidate designed to conceal who is the actual US Senator running for re-election) is one of the most egregious attacks we have seen on the integrity of American elections. It reveals pure contempt for voters.

Why are Democrats going after Elon Musk with everything they have? It's not because he's a billionaire in politics. They've been perfectly comfortable with billionaires in politics for decades. They're going after him because he's the first one playing against them. Look at the numbers. Soros's Democracy PAC had put over $100 million into this midterm cycle before the summer was even over. Only a tiny fraction of it shows up under his own name. Then add the advocacy arm of his foundations, which doesn't have to disclose all of its political spending. And that's just the visible part. Over 40 years, tens of billions have gone into NGOs, universities, legal networks and media projects that shape what counts as an "acceptable" opinion. That's the real game. Billionaires have been buying politicians for decades, on every side. But the smartest ones figured something out: you don't buy a candidate, you buy the ecosystem. Universities, foundations, newsrooms, NGOs, regulators, courts. Once you control who writes the reports, who trains the lawyers and who decides what counts as "misinformation", elections become a detail. For 30 years that ecosystem leaned one way. Nobody called it oligarchy. They called it "civil society." Then Musk showed up. He bought the main public square, took the filters off, and started spending in the open, under his own name. Yes, he's the biggest donor of these midterms. Everyone can see exactly how much he gave and to whom. That's the difference. One plays in daylight, the other plays through a maze of structures. And suddenly, billionaire money in politics became a threat to democracy. This isn't really about left versus right. It's about an ideology that captured these institutions and leads straight into a wall. More regulation, less building. More process, less progress. Countries shutting down working nuclear plants. A decade to approve a power line. A system whose default answer to any ambition is "no." Musk is the opposite. Reusable rockets. Mass-market EVs. Satellite internet for the whole planet. Brain-computer interfaces. A serious plan to make humanity multiplanetary. You can hate his tweets. You can't deny that no one in the last 20 years has pushed the frontier of what humanity can build further than he has. That's why they need to break him. Not because of his money. Because he proves the system can be bypassed. If we leave the system as it is, we don't get a catastrophe. We get something worse: slow, comfortable stagnation. A civilization that manages its own decline instead of building its future.

Brivael Le Pogam @brivael

24 hours ago

Everyone in Europe argues about the symptoms. Almost nobody looks at the plumbing: who funds the people who write the norms, litigate before the courts and set the boundaries of the debate. Take the best-documented case: the Open Society Foundations, created by George Soros.

65 794 2K 69K 350

The media wants to pretend it is just a coincidence, but the optics from Detroit are absolutely glaring. You have Barack Obama—a man who spent his entire presidency appeasing global Islamic interests—rushing to Michigan to rally for Abdul El-Sayed. El-Sayed is the radical progressive candidate fighting to become the first Muslim in the US Senate. This is the same candidate who has called for an end to all US military aid to Israel. And who does the Democrat establishment call in to rescue his floundering campaign? Barack Obama. During his speech in Detroit, Obama literally told the crowd, "We have seen this movie before. I starred in it". He is openly telling you exactly what this is. It is entirely typical. Obama’s legacy is built on completely abandoning traditional American alliances while empowering radical Middle Eastern regimes with pallets of cash. Now he is desperate to install a senator who openly calls Israel’s self-defense a "genocide". They are showing you exactly who they are and what their priorities are. They despise American sovereignty and traditional Western alliances, and they will always flock together to ensure those institutions are dismantled from the inside out. Michigan is the frontline, and Trump is exactly right to call this out.

Same issue everywhere: if you object to mass illegal immigration, you are branded as racist. While your country if being conquered & your way of life decimated. That does not happen by accident - it happens by design. The question is what are you prepared to risk to address this before all the good options are gone? If they were coming with tanks & bombs, this would be a very different conversation. We would not be arguing, people would just act. But this is warfare of a very different nature & so most people do not recognize it. Unfortunately the goals are the same - whether we recognize it or not, people are still being used as a weapon of invasion & conquest all over the west. So why only the west?

Josef Bosch @realjosefbosch

2 days ago

It’s so anachronistic to hear a random woman—let alone a French one—speak like this. I can’t remember the last time I heard a white woman of any national origin speak this defiantly and bravely. Major blancpill.

573 4K 20K 641K 4K

Regardez bien ce qui s'est passé au Brésil dimanche. Les bureaux de vote ferment. Le dépouillement commence. Et là, un seul juge de la Cour suprême décide de prolonger le vote de deux heures, dans tout le pays. Le tribunal électoral suspend le comptage en urgence. Selon la presse brésilienne, ses propres membres étaient contre. Résultat : pour la première fois depuis le retour de la démocratie au Brésil, le candidat battu au premier tour remporte le second. Peut-être que tout est propre. Mais quand les règles d'un scrutin changent pendant le scrutin, sur décision d'un homme que personne n'a élu, la confiance meurt. Et une démocratie sans confiance n'est plus qu'un décor de théâtre. Maintenant, regardez qui applaudit. Alex Soros : « Félicitations au Brésil pour avoir, une fois de plus, tenu tête à l'autoritarisme. » Ursula von der Leyen : « La démocratie et le multilatéralisme ont gagné. » Pedro Sánchez, à un mois de ses propres élections, annonce que « la remontée mondiale du progressisme » va arriver en Espagne. Ils ne se cachent même plus. L'autoritarisme, c'est un peuple qui vote mal. La démocratie, c'est un juge qui garde les urnes ouvertes jusqu'à ce que le résultat soit le bon. Ils ont compris une chose : le réel est contre eux. L'immigration, l'insécurité, le déclassement, la dette. Le réel est trop fort, trop violent, et sur le terrain des idées, ils ne gagnent plus. Alors le combat se déplace : les tribunaux, les procédures, les horaires, les inéligibilités. En France, on connaît déjà la musique. On a déjà vu des juges décider de qui a le droit de se présenter. Le Brésil n'est pas une exception. C'est un prototype. Il y a de fortes chances que ce scénario se rejoue partout en Occident, dans chaque pays où ils n'ont pas encore perdu. Alors préparez-vous. Pas seulement à faire campagne : à protéger le scrutin. Des assesseurs dans chaque bureau. Des avocats prêts le soir même. Chaque règle connue par cœur. Chaque procès-verbal photographié. Gagner ne suffira pas. Il faudra gagner avec une marge qu'aucun juge ne pourra effacer, et surveiller chaque urne jusqu'au dernier bulletin. Le réel est de notre côté. Encore faut-il qu'on nous laisse le compter.

Guillaume Herblot 🎖️ @Guigz75116

14 hours ago

Bukele l’a dit clairement : « Si vous n’impeachez pas les juges corrompus, vous NE POUVEZ PAS réformer le pays. Ils formeront un cartel (une dictature judiciaire) et bloqueront toutes les réformes. » Le Brésil vient de le montrer en direct. La France le pratique depuis des

78 2K 6K 349K 312

Kamala attempts to articulate the value of talking to children. It doesn't go well: "I mean, if you have the chance in whatever your, you know, your circle of life to just, you know, talk to like an eight year old, that's one of the best things, you know, someone who just has that twinkle." "It hasn't been, you know, they haven't they they have the twinkle. They believe in, in all. And they're curious and - Oh, that gives me joy just because, you know, there is something I think about, looking at children to remind us of our natural nature, who we actually it is our nature, our - There is something about that." This was said at a 'reproductive rights' event. The irony here is next level. She somehow keeps managing to get worse at this.

For anyone confused about what happened in Brazil… Imagine if the Kamala Harris campaign, after losing the first round of voting by over two MILLION votes and watching her trail all month, spent Election Day not counting voters but counting buses, and when the courts refused to arrest a city official over a bus spreadsheet, they didn't take no for an answer, they went around the election court entirely, straight to a Supreme Court justice who just happened to be the Democratic president's former personal lawyer, the same president who put him on the bench, and that justice just happened to rule three minutes before polls closed, so late that many machines were already shut and sealed, and then, instead of fixing it, he quietly rewrote his own order so that only the stations still open could keep voting, and nobody, not the press, not the election officials, not anyone, can tell you how many stayed open, or where they were, or why that list hasn't been released, or whether it just happened to line up with the exact neighborhoods the Democrats had spent all day naming, while Republican voters in flooded, blacked-out towns who had begged for extra time were told the doors were locked and to go home, and then the vote count itself was frozen for two full hours in the dark, and when the lights came back on the Democrat had pulled off the first runoff comeback in the nation's history, and the same people who spent four years saying trust the institutions announced the institutions had worked perfectly, that asking which polls stayed open was an attack on democracy, that the list of open polls was classified for the good of democracy which is roughly where Brazil is tonight.

🚨🚨THE DEMOCRACY FILES / ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK, PART 9: THE BIG PICTURE 🚨 Sunday is a day of rest. Today I took a step back and asked, "where is all this money coming from?" I'm too tired to type an actual summary. TL;DR: billions have been invested in restructuring American governance since Trump was elected. Many have warned of a color revolution because they saw the civil society apparatus (aka, having millions of people on standby to break stuff) being built in real time. What makes 2026 different is that it's the first time we know of that we found an operational, short-term plan to actually do a coup. Everything we've covered has been from the R2T NGO, which serves as a recording/coordinating platform of sorts for several key NGOs including the one consisting of 300 ex-USAID employees, RAD. It's well documented in several previous drops that RAD has a tight relationship with the "Blocking" lane, now unified under the United Democracy Alliance (UDA) umbrella led by Horizons Project. I researched the "big picture" of how UDA relates to bigger players, so to speak. This sets up the stage for later, much more consequential drops. I think the video covers it pretty well...

Hello Alex Alex Alex, Let me summarize the book UNELECTED in a nutshell. The Industrial Revolution created a class of private citizens with unimaginable wealth. Many were reviled as robber barons (e.g., Rockefeller of Standard Oil). Others had a better image, like Andrew Carnegie. These new rich decided because they had money, they had a responsibility to do good by the world. So they started building global philanthropic networks that could go into every country. In order to do so, they hired Department of State and Department of War and other state officials. They quickly took over the country's education system starting in the 1920s to train them in the "international mind." When the intelligence community truly sprang up in World War II, the IC hired from ... these same shadowy philanthropic networks. And after WWII, they all coalesced on the same goal: the best chance at achieving a human utopia is to bring the entire world to "democracy." Except it turns out converting countries to democracy isn't so simple as just financing CIA coups. Did all those NGOs question their own assumption might be flawed - that not every peoples, not every culture and religion is compatible with "democracy"? No. Instead, the Trilateral Commission in the 1970s concluded that a more technocratic route was necessary. And over many iterations - the Balkans and African adventures of the 90s, the Iraq & Afghanistan ventures, Arab Spring and color revolutions ... every failed iteration of "democracy" always resulted in the same conclusion: the people are dumb, we have to try harder, put more pressure on them, tighten the screws. And now you have become fully self-referential. Anyone who disagrees with you is "authoritarian." Anyone who agrees with you is "our democracy." Voting methods doesn't matter. That the judiciary system blatantly stole the election doesn't matter. And nowhere this is more obvious in your 30th anniversary publication. In your 30th anniversary publication, you had an article from your longtime head of Open Society Fund-Serbia, Sonja Licht. She also happens to be one of the most decorated civilians in Europe and widely considered an expert in "democracy:" 🔹 Pro Merit Medal of the Council of Europe 🔹 Star of Italian Solidarity 🔹 French Legion of Honour Her solution: "I believe the time has come for a responsible, courageous elite, those who care far more about addressing the genuine social problems than about election results. Only a political elite with vision, prudence and a focus on the general good—to whom the electorate, with their active involvement in public life, can cede part of their sovereignty in the elections... spearhead... our struggle to survive." Read that again. The idea of democracy as pushed by the head of one of your foundations is to literally stop "election results" and to have the public cede their trust to a technocratic elite. End democracy to save democracy itself. This is the final form of a project that started a hundred years ago to spread free markets and create global peace and instill self-governance throughout the world. This is your legacy, Alex Soros. Your father spent his life fighting Communism. You, as his protege, will spend your life perfecting Communism. In the name of "democracy."

🔥 LMFAO! President Trump just gave a shoutout to NICKI MINAJ'S ASS at his Michigan rally "By the way, I looked at one HELL of a BEAUTIFUL ASS before — NICKI MINAJ! That's HARD to miss!" "STAND UP! That's hard to MISS!" I did NOT see this coming, despite her being in the audience 🤣

Hey @IlhanMN, why did you delete this?

I called it from day 1. Obama is a POS. He campaigned for Muslim Brotherhood candidate Abdul El Sayed tonight- no doubt handpicked by Valerie Jarrett of Iran...Obama says "he will finish job we started." Really? Need more proof I was right from day 1? Obama just outed himself as Muslim Brotherhood, Sharia Law, radical communist "Manchurian Candidate." Finish what he startted? What? Making USA into a communist Muslim Sharia Law country? PS Dems love gays & transgenders. But last I checked Muslims throw gays & transgenders off roofs of 6 story buildings. This will be interesting. thegatewaypundit.com/2026/10/awkwar…