Validating Lightning Signer @VLSProject

Lightning security that scales. Transform key management from liability to competitive edge. Non-custodial by design, enterprise-grade by default. https://t.co/uyM2m1tBs7 gitlab.com/lightning-sign… Joined September 2020

Tweets

342
Followers

1K
Following

49
Likes

174

Validating Lightning Signer @VLSProject

7 hours ago

Security isn’t just defense , it’s what allows companies to confidently scale their channel balances from thousands to millions without fear of hacks.

0 0 0 58 0

Validating Lightning Signer @VLSProject

a day ago

Security doesn’t slow you down. It removes fear. The more secure your Lightning stack, the faster you can expand liquidity and serve new clients.

0 1 2 116 0

Validating Lightning Signer @VLSProject

a day ago

A custodial Lightning service is just another bank with faster rails. A self-custodial one is Bitcoin, extended.

3 3 9 1K 0

Validating Lightning Signer @VLSProject

2 days ago

Lightning adoption will stall if companies keep insisting on custody. Users didn’t come to Bitcoin to hand their funds back to intermediaries.

0 1 3 178 0

Validating Lightning Signer @VLSProject

2 days ago

A validating signer turns a catastrophic breach into a survivable event. Even if the Lightning node is fully compromised, funds remain safe. Try getting that level of security from a blind signer.

0 1 5 165 0

Validating Lightning Signer @VLSProject

3 days ago

Custody = liability on your balance sheet. Every sat you hold is risk. With VLS, the keys and the control of funds stay with your users, and the liability stays off your books.

0 1 3 123 0

Validating Lightning Signer @VLSProject

3 days ago

Security is adoption. Without it, businesses cap their channel size to avoid risk. With VLS, they can scale liquidity without fear of total loss.

0 0 0 67 0

Validating Lightning Signer @VLSProject

4 days ago

Custody looks easy until the first audit. Then you realize every market entry costs millions in paperwork. Non-custody is cheaper, safer, faster.

0 0 0 85 0

Validating Lightning Signer @VLSProject

4 days ago

Lightning nodes are complex software stacks. Bugs are inevitable. A validating signer is your last line of defense when the node misbehaves.

0 0 0 44 0

Validating Lightning Signer @VLSProject

5 days ago

The Lightning protocol has dozens of edge cases: revoked transactions, HTLC expiry races, incorrect closes. VLS enforces policy so those mistakes can’t cost you funds.

0 0 0 84 0

Validating Lightning Signer @VLSProject

5 days ago

When a company says “we don’t hold your funds,” users lean in. When they say “trust us with custody,” users lean out.

0 0 0 71 0

Validating Lightning Signer @VLSProject

6 days ago

Fill in the blank: Lightning is not non-custodial unless __________.

0 0 1 101 0

Validating Lightning Signer @VLSProject

6 days ago

“Not your keys, not your coins.” Shouldn’t Lightning live up to that too? Yes or no?

0 1 4 154 0

Validating Lightning Signer @VLSProject

6 days ago

A hardware wallet that blindly signs any request without checking if it is legitimate would be laughed out of Bitcoin. Yet that’s how most "non-custodial" / "self-custodial" Lightning setups work today. VLS fixes this.

0 3 9 523 0

Validating Lightning Signer @VLSProject

7 days ago

“Non-custodial” isn’t just a legal position. It’s a growth strategy. It means fewer regulators in your way, more trust from users, and easier adoption worldwide.