Karla Santos @Wingles

Why is it that I had to give my 2 FREAKING YEAR NOTICE. Lol. I'm not even sure and am still hesitant because I want to bake my cake and eat it too. ... Yes, my next 2 years are already planned.

0 0 0 20 0

View Details

Karla Santos @Wingles

5 months ago

Still so competitive....

0 0 0 9 0

View Details

Karla Santos @Wingles

5 months ago

David Tennant can do no wrong. Just finished binge watching BroadChurch and it's amazing. And of course, Olivia Coleman.

0 0 1 81 0

View Details

Karla Santos @Wingles

5 months ago

I've named our next dog, which we have no plans of getting. Name: Butter 😅😅😅

0 0 0 12 0

View Details

Karla Santos @Wingles

5 months ago

@risahontiveros Queen na, mother pa!!!!! Please stay strong. 🔥🔥🔥

0 0 0 25 0

View Details

Inside, I'm roar-ing and crying. I do not want to accept my minor-ish injury but しょうがない. I just wish I were in more pain so I know viscerally that I'm out for the count. As it is, I feel like I can pin everyone .

0 0 0 10 0

View Details

Kiko Pangilinan @kikopangilinan

5 months ago

JOINT STATEMENT ON THE SENATE MINORITY WALKOUT We strongly condemn what appears to be an attempt to rush a major change in the Senate Rules, especially when several members of the minority still wanted to speak and raise serious questions on the floor. Bakit kailangang madaliin? Bakit kailangang pigilan ang mga gustong magsalita? Bakit kailangang i-divide ang house kung marami pang senador ang nagtatanong tungkol sa proseso? Minamadali ba ang rule change na ito dahil gusto nilang maka boto si Senator Bato? At ngayong may mga ulat na may mga majority senators na maaaring arestuhin? We walked out because what happened on the floor looked less like orderly deliberation. The proposed rule change affects how senators may attend sessions, participate in proceedings and exercise their mandate through remote means, and such a measure should be opened to healthy public debate instead of being rushed by the tyranny of the majority. We have always welcomed healthy discussions on the floor, but this should mean allowing all members to be heard, not forcing the chamber to move at the speed preferred by the majority. At the time the motion was taken up, there was no duly constituted Committee on Rules and there was not even an elected Majority Leader who could properly guide a rules amendment through the regular process. How could there have been any action or discussion before the Committee on Rules when no Committee on Rules has been organized to date? With due respect, the answer that no Senate rule had been violated does not settle the matter, because the rules cannot be treated as a matter of convenience when the very process for amending them is under serious question. The timing raises a question that the public deserves to hear debated openly. Kaya pinili naming tumayo at iwan ang majority sa plenary. Kaya kami nagdesisyon to question the quorum and call for adjournment. If the proposal is truly defensible, then let it pass through the proper route. We owe it to the people who voted for us to do our mandate. This is why we want more time to discuss this further.