Grayson Hawk @graybasedtheory

Science & History Communicator- I debate pseudoscience on YouTube m.youtube.com/channel/UCki3H… Joined March 2023

Tweets

640
Followers

68
Following

90
Likes

714

Grayson Hawk @graybasedtheory

a month ago

@PRabbitholes Imagine if this was your last tweet before you die and this is all people had to remember you

0 0 0 3 0

View Details

kalasevsky @kalasevsky

6 months ago

No, it’s fine, I just didn’t expect Liet-Kynes to be Chinese

China has invented a process that can turn desert sand into fertile soil in less than a year. They use lab-grown microbes to bind sand together and create firm ground, allowing plants to grow in areas that were uninhabitable.

90 761 7K 1.7M 958

26 902 14K 334K 648

View Details

Grayson Hawk @graybasedtheory

7 months ago

God this fucking country is stupid

Navroop Singh @TheNavroopSingh

7 months ago

“According to multiple insider claims, parts of the Pentagon are pushing back against full declassification of UFO files amid fears that the phenomenon may have 'demonic' or even 'interdimensional' implications. The result is a tense stand off that could shape how much the public

17 35 189 11K 28

0 0 1 46 1

View Details

Grayson Hawk @graybasedtheory

7 months ago

@Leophilius Why didn’t you provide the source and/or th context for the pic? What am I looking at? Is this a survey of philosophers?

1 0 0 34 0

View Details

Grayson Hawk @graybasedtheory

7 months ago

@neutrinomoon @cookiebotmonstr This isn’t Filmore, Grok is a dumbass. This is Van Buren

1 0 1 58 0

View Details

Grayson Hawk @graybasedtheory

9 months ago

@TAndersen_nSCIr @martinmbauer Are you saying in 1995 that dark matter was explained by the standard model? Or that dark matter was unknown at the time? Your statement is confusing

0 0 0 41 0

View Details

Grayson Hawk @graybasedtheory

10 months ago

@SerpenIllus My favorite moment that caught me by surprise was when the lions got chased off by a pack of giant otters! And the hilarious slow-mo chase with the kangaroos and koala lions lol. The Glyptodont design was stellar!

0 0 1 88 0

View Details

Grayson Hawk @graybasedtheory

10 months ago

@SpeedWatkins But that’s why I already said we have evolution to explain that. I was really hoping you were going to provide a non-biological (and non-fine-tuning) example. Because this just sounds like intelligent design talking points now, sadly

0 0 0 41 0

View Details

Grayson Hawk @graybasedtheory

10 months ago

@SpeedWatkins Can you provide an example? Because I don’t share your intuition and have no idea what aspect of the universe you’re looking at that strikes you as the result of design

1 0 0 59 0

View Details

Grayson Hawk @graybasedtheory

10 months ago

@SpeedWatkins Design as S? That confuses me, since know of several naturalistic processes that create the appearance of design, such as evolution

1 0 0 101 0

View Details

Grayson Hawk @graybasedtheory

10 months ago

@PAHoyeck Have you seen The Holdovers? One of the best recent Christmas movies for sure

1 0 1 29 0

View Details

Grayson Hawk @graybasedtheory

10 months ago

@PAHoyeck @Leophilius If there is no objective morality then Thor Love and Thunder isn’t a bad movie, thanks Frank

0 0 2 24 0

View Details

Grayson Hawk @graybasedtheory

11 months ago

@PAHoyeck Yeah sorry I’m bad at using twitter. My point is that someone who answers “no” to the question shouldn’t be in the same category as someone who answers “I don’t know” because imo they hold meaningfully different positions. There’s 3 categories but only 2 labels

0 0 0 26 0

View Details

Grayson Hawk @graybasedtheory

11 months ago

@PAHoyeck And yes I do think that most people would answer “I don’t know” if they didn’t know what time the library closed, and no one would say “no” to such a question typically if they weren’t sure

1 0 0 35 0

View Details

Grayson Hawk @graybasedtheory

11 months ago

@PAHoyeck Having a positive belief otherwise. It seems to me that we need two terms to label these two meaningfully different subcategories of atheist. Hard or soft atheism, maybe. And FYI I am in your category but consider myself an atheist not an agnostic /2

0 0 0 14 0

View Details

Grayson Hawk @graybasedtheory

11 months ago

@PAHoyeck It seems to me there’s 3 separate categories and only two labels. Someone who answers “I don’t know” is definitely an agnostic, and I don’t think someone who answers “no” should be grouped in the same category. But I agree that “no” can mean either lacking belief or 1/

0 0 0 18 0

View Details

Grayson Hawk @graybasedtheory

11 months ago

@PAHoyeck To me that just sounds like you’re an atheist, in the colloquial sense understood by most people. If your answer to “Do you believe in God?” Is “No.” then I think most people would consider you an atheist. You’re not unsure whether you believe, like an agnostic

1 0 0 83 0

View Details

Grayson Hawk @graybasedtheory

11 months ago

@StartsWithABang The universe looks like it will keep expanding forever? Doesn’t the new DESI result indicate that eventually the expansion will slow down and gravity will cause a Big Crunch?