Nathan Mess @mess66830

It genuinely amused me that people think replacing Starmer will make things better. From Boris Johnson's election onwards, we've been shuffling the bollards on the Titanic. You have to actually change direction if you want to avoid crashing into the iceberg: - End Net Zero - Make business viable again - Get welfare under control - Fund defence - Ensure equality under the law - Arrest criminals and keep them in jail - Deport illegal immigrants and close the border - Bring the civil service to heel Burnham will become as unpopular as Starmer within months since he isn't going to do any of that.

1/ Adolescence. A Netflix drama with a fictional white boy. Parliament debated it. Into every school within weeks. To teach boys about misogyny. That was fiction. 🧵

@Keir_Starmer Labour were bystanders.

Last year, a video went viral of a scared, 12 year old girl in Dundee. She was waving weapons, shouting at a migrant to leave her alone. Almost immediately, many on the left were calling this girl a liar (and worse). They were saying the “far-right” were whipping up ‘anti-migrant hate’. People like @HumzaYousaf & many more called it ‘bullsh*t’. Many, including people like @jdpoc while calling her a liar & talking about her ‘hatred’, showed pictures of the little girl. Just to make sure everyone knew who the ‘liar’ they were talking about, was. A fundraiser for the girl was mocked, suggesting she’d use the money to buy “machetes and IronBru” She was a child. Their posts were seen by hundreds of thousands of people. She wasn’t ‘hate-filled’, she was scared. Yesterday, her version of events was proven to be true. She was sexually harassed by a migrant and another child physically assaulted too. The man and his sister were prosecuted. How shameful that children need to arm themselves for protection. How shameful that adults will deny their reality. How shameful that some people are so desperate to defend migration into this country, that they will literally mock children who are victims of their crimes. Shame on you all. I’ll be fascinated to see how many of you publicly apologise to the girl, in the same public way that you called her a liar. I won’t hold my breath… I hope this girl is ok. belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/uk/bulgar…

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

@Keir_Starmer All of a sudden we can decide who gets to enter Britain? Deport the third world rapists, conmen and sex pests before Kanye sodding West.

@MattWalshBlog I will pay for the defense of anyone who speaks the truth about this and is sued for doing so

A Jewish lawyer has been arrested for wearing a Star of David on a London street. Not for assault. Not for provocation. For wearing a 2cm symbol of his faith – because an officer decided it might "antagonise" pro-Palestine protesters. The man was handcuffed, held for ten hours, questioned about his "political beliefs," and told that his necklace could offend. There it is: the quiet death of equal citizenship. The symbol that once marked Jews for persecution in Europe now marks them for arrest in England. The police call it "keeping the peace." In truth, it's cowardice turned into policy. It's what happens when the state becomes more afraid of offending the offender than protecting the victim. "Antagonising" has become a crime. Translation: if a mob hates you enough, you lose your rights. We've seen this drift before. The modern officer speaks the language of HR, not justice. "Tensions are high," "communities are sensitive," "we must be proportionate." All these phrases mean the same thing: the law no longer applies equally. Protesters can chant "From the river to the sea," wave Hamas flags, and scream "Globalise the Intifada" without consequence. But a Jew wearing a small star is branded a threat to public order. This lawyer was no agitator. He was an independent legal observer, documenting hate speech. Yet the police accused him of "getting too close" to the protesters, as though proximity to hatred makes you guilty of it. A detective even questioned whether his Star of David might have "antagonised" the crowd – as if the problem were not the mob's hatred, but the Jew's visibility. The logic is medieval: cover your faith or invite danger. The police might as well have told him to remove it for his own safety – a phrase every Jew in history knows too well. This arrest doesn't stand alone. It sits squarely in the new two-tier policing of Britain – one standard for those who threaten disorder, another for those who don't. The mob rules by emotional blackmail, and the state plays along. It's the same moral rot we've seen from Birmingham to Manchester: Islamists and Leftists marching under the same banners, denouncing Israel while making Jews afraid to show their faces. The same logic that banned Israeli football fans in Birmingham now criminalises the Star of David in Kensington. The Leftist–Islamist alliance has found its instrument – not the crowd, but the police themselves. And Parliament, packed with MPs who mistake cowardice for tolerance, lets it happen. We've reached the point where a man wearing a symbol of Judaism is treated as a potential provocateur, while those chanting for the destruction of the Jewish state are treated as "community voices." This isn't neutrality. It's inversion. The British police force now treats feelings as facts and law as optional. If a group claims "offence," it wins by default. If you resist, you are labelled the aggressor. This is the bureaucratic form of mob rule – polite, procedural, and deadly to principle. And at its core lies the same alliance corroding our politics: a Left that sees Jews as colonialists, and Islamists who see them as infidels. Together they've built a climate where antisemitism parades as virtue – and the state, desperate not to be called racist, acts as their shield. The issue is not one Jewish lawyer or one small star. It's the precedent: that British law now bends to those who hate Jews more than to those who are Jewish. Once a country accepts that logic, it has already traded freedom for fear. And history shows that trade never stops at the synagogue door. The police say they were preventing "provocation." But when did the presence of a Jew become provocation? When did the Star of David – symbol of faith, memory, and survival – become a public order offence? The answer is when Britain forgot who it was. "A Jewish lawyer has been arrested for wearing a Star of David on a London street."

🚨BREAKING: Councillor reported to the Police for saying she was 'born and bred' in Falkirk I wish I was joking We live in a police state TWENTY TWO PAGE POLICE DOSSIER FILED FOR 'OFFENSIVE REMARKS' She will now be questioned by Police Read the full complaint below ⬇️

A man called Jihad has gone on murder spree on a synagogue and two "respected", "neutral" and "balanced" recent BBC stalwarts would like you to believe the problem is... right wing journalists. You really, really, really don't hate the media enough.

If you were one of those doubtless well meaning middle class white people wearing a keffiyeh and chanting "Globalise the intifada" you really should know what happened in Manchester today is what you were calling for. That's EXACTLY what it involves.

Do Labour really think Reform is leading the polls because Farage hasn't been called "racist" enough? Whatever your view of Reform, you can't possibly be deluded enough to think that people support them because they are unaware of Reform's views on immigration. The reality is the exact opposite: people support them BECAUSE of their views on immigration. So every time a Labour MP calls Reform racist, all they're doing is calling Reform supporters racist. Who came up with this genius strategy? At a time when their leader is one of the most unpopular PMs in modern British history they can't possibly think this will work, can they? To say nothing of the fake patriotism. Do they really think the British people don't remember Gordon Brown calling a pensioner bigoted for being concerned about immigration? Emily Thornberry posting a photo of an England flag and a white van with a sneering comment? A full decade of anyone who expressed any sort of pro-Britain sentiment being smeared? My sense is they're doing this because the few of them that are in some contact with reality understand what they need to do to beat Reform and know they can't do it. They can't make the economy grow because, for political reasons, they can't abandon Net Zero and, for political reasons, they can't cut welfare spending and, for political reasons, they can't stimulate business growth by cutting taxes. They can't stop illegal immigration because, for political reasons, they won't leave the ECHR and deport the 500k-1 mil illegal immigrants. So all they are left with is calling Reform racist while stealing their policies 🤣

Digital ID has nothing to do with immigration, just think critically for 3 seconds. Britain currently has up to 1 million illegal immigrants. Many, if not most, are known to the authorities. And yet they're still here. The reason they're here is NOT that we can't identify them (the problem Digital ID is supposed to solve), the problem is that we won't deport them even when we know who they are. This is not about immigration, it's about building CONTROL INFRASTRUCTURE. It's why Blair tried and failed to push them through 20 years ago. Imagine that governments which routinely arrest people for jokes and memes, locked people in their homes during COVID and think half the country is "far right" have these tools at its disposal. And, some of you are convinced half the country really is "far right" and are about to elect that evil fascist Herr Farage. You want him to have this control infrastructure at his disposal? This needs to be opposed by everyone across the political spectrum. It has nothing to do with what you're being told: Starmer is lying to you and so are his media lackeys.

babylonbee.com/news/quiz-can-…

"If you're a criminal, you'll be deported." — Barack Obama, November 20, 2014 This is exactly what President Trump is doing right now, but Democrats still pretend to be outraged.

The cheap green lie You are told that solar and wind are cheap But cramming in more solar and wind just makes power more and more costly because solar and wind are worthless when not sunny and windy iea.org/data-and-stati… WSJ: archive.ph/lZKbb x.com/i/web/status/1…

The petition to abolish Orwellian 'non-crimes' has just passed 7,000 signatures! Help push this to 10,000 so the government has to respond. Let’s keep the momentum going — sign here. petition.parliament.uk/petitions/7010… Together, we can defend fairness, accountability, and free expression.

This is seriously messed up

End Wokeness @EndWokeness

2 years ago

LAFD Assistant Chief Kristine Larson: "Am I able to carry your husband out of a fire? He got himself in the wrong place."

15K 15K 79K 86.0M 15K

Back in 2019, I posted about how one of my main fears about left-wing identity politics (i.e., CRT) was how it would foster a dangerous form of white identity politics on the right. This, in turn, would be viewed by the woke left as proof that their moral panic over "white supremacy" was right all along, even though they had essentially created it. We're seeing this materialize right now in the woke/identitarian/new/retarded/(insert your preferred term here) right. It was a predictable outcome, but not one we should welcome. It must be opposed as strongly as we opposed left-wing woke identity politics. Failing to respond forcefully will be the end of the coalition we've built of Americans who understand that individual merit, rather than group identity, must reign supreme. As @ConceptualJames has said, there's nothing the woke left is better at than defeating white identitarianism. The woke left want this, because they know it will herald their return to power. We cannot afford to let that happen.