Zdenek Slavik @needcompute

@EMizzle202 @rezoundous In this field you always need more then you have.

@giadotai It's pointless. The orange head can rename it whatever he wants, and even most of his own voters will call it bullshit. I'll keep using AI. And if I hear someone say "SI," he won't need to flash the Illuminati pyramid sign. I'll know he's a moron right away.

@TruthTrumpPost Fun fact: without EU-based ASML and Taiwan's TSMC, there's no "American AI leadership." The most advanced chips on the planet depend on a European machine and a small island living under constant pressure from China. Nobody leads this alone, so maybe stop insulting your allies.

@realDonaldTrump This will be a LOSS like the world has never seen before. Many people are saying it. Tremendous loss. The biggest!

@DeRonin_ Have you lost your mind? If one moron calls bullshit a beautiful cake, and another moron agrees it's a beautiful cake, are you going to eat it?

@tradesoftoday @gaius1337 ok moron

@minchoi Normal people still call this place Twitter, and they'll keep calling AI just AI.

@tradesoftoday @gaius1337 only morons will call it SI.

@gaius1337 100% same. If I said "X," half the people would think I'm talking about a porn site.

@elonmusk How about this?x.com/needcompute/st…

Zdenek Slavik @needcompute

3 weeks ago

Not joining the .si hype. The people who actually built this field named it Artificial Intelligence back in 1956 at Dartmouth. Seventy years of research, and the name held. No marketing bullcrap like "SI." Now the enlightened orange head decided, like a dog marking yet another

1 1 3 780 0

@FiveTimesAugust Now waiting for my ban from Mr. "No Censorship" himself. x.com/needcompute/st…

Zdenek Slavik @needcompute

3 weeks ago

Not joining the .si hype. The people who actually built this field named it Artificial Intelligence back in 1956 at Dartmouth. Seventy years of research, and the name held. No marketing bullcrap like "SI." Now the enlightened orange head decided, like a dog marking yet another

1 1 3 780 0

@YammerTime01 This is how it is x.com/needcompute/st…

Zdenek Slavik @needcompute

3 weeks ago

Not joining the .si hype. The people who actually built this field named it Artificial Intelligence back in 1956 at Dartmouth. Seventy years of research, and the name held. No marketing bullcrap like "SI." Now the enlightened orange head decided, like a dog marking yet another

1 1 3 780 0

@WhiteHouse how about this? x.com/needcompute/st…

Zdenek Slavik @needcompute

3 weeks ago

Not joining the .si hype. The people who actually built this field named it Artificial Intelligence back in 1956 at Dartmouth. Seventy years of research, and the name held. No marketing bullcrap like "SI." Now the enlightened orange head decided, like a dog marking yet another

1 1 3 780 0

@poordart x.com/needcompute/st…

Zdenek Slavik @needcompute

3 weeks ago

Not joining the .si hype. The people who actually built this field named it Artificial Intelligence back in 1956 at Dartmouth. Seventy years of research, and the name held. No marketing bullcrap like "SI." Now the enlightened orange head decided, like a dog marking yet another

1 1 3 780 0

@claudiamiclea agree x.com/needcompute/st…

Zdenek Slavik @needcompute

3 weeks ago

Not joining the .si hype. The people who actually built this field named it Artificial Intelligence back in 1956 at Dartmouth. Seventy years of research, and the name held. No marketing bullcrap like "SI." Now the enlightened orange head decided, like a dog marking yet another

1 1 3 780 0

Not joining the .si hype. The people who actually built this field named it Artificial Intelligence back in 1956 at Dartmouth. Seventy years of research, and the name held. No marketing bullcrap like "SI." Now the enlightened orange head decided, like a dog marking yet another post, to rename something again. And suddenly the tech leaders are racing to see who can crawl furthest up his ass, rebranding product pages and keynotes overnight. Renaming it doesn't make the models smarter. It doesn't lower prices, it doesn't fix usage limits, and it doesn't make anything "super." It's just a new label on the same thing. Mark my words: two years from now they'll all quietly rebrand back to AI, because it's complete bullshit.

@CodexResets1 Give it about two years and they'll rebrand back to "AI." We all know the only true superintelligence is under the orange hair.

The weirdest part: after I complained, an OpenAI employee asked for my email to check my subscription. Since then, that account's usage moves slowly, while my other account, which I never mentioned, drains much faster. So do they quietly give better coefficients to people who complain, and keep everyone else quiet with 62,500 credits? Possible. I honestly have no idea if it's true.

Good question. I really tried to figure it out, but honestly it's a mess. Every reset could change the coefficients, wipe or change the cache, speed up the models, or swap in better quants. Too many moving parts, so I've stopped trying to understand what my usage meter is actually doing. x.com/needcompute/st…

Zdenek Slavik @needcompute

3 weeks ago

@thsottiaux My usage seems to be draining much faster than yesterday. Since the weekly reset (less than 10 hours ago), I've already used 70%. Yesterday I went from 40% to 30% over the whole day. How can I verify I'm still on the old 20x quota I was promised? Any ideas?x.com/needcompute/st…

28 0 33 21K 0