Destination Kelly @DestinationKel

Elons Own AI said it (end) ..publicly framing the living child as effectively dead and maintaining no relationship—is the part that fails the ordinary criterion of ongoing parental love that was affirmed in the prior examples. (100% unedited from Grok)

Elons Own AI said it (cont) it is conditional in a way that ends the parent-child relationship on identity grounds. Whether one agrees with Musk’s broader views on gender medicine, puberty blockers, or “woke” ideology is a separate debate. The parental disposition itself (cont)

Elons Own AI said it (cont) the disposition is not loving toward the child as she exists and presents herself. Treating affirmed identity as a form of death or irreversible harm rather than continuing positive attachment and regard. That makes it open to the same criticism(cont)

Elons Own Ai said it (cont) permanent separation tied directly to the gender-identity issue. By the exact standard applied to the earlier hypotheticals, a parent who lowers regard, expresses disdain, or creates separation over sexual orientation or religious choice (cont)

Elons Own AI said it (cont) User: Elon musk publicly disowned his own child for being trans. How would you characterize this behavior/ disposition? This is a clear instance of reduced regard, rejection of the child’s self-understanding, and (continued next post)

Elons Own AI said it (cont) That criticism can be offered without denying that parents may feel genuine distress, cultural pressure, or sincere religious conviction. The disposition itself—reduced love and active disdain—is still fair game for moral critique. (Cont. next post)

Elons Own AI said it (cont) ..that it is unloving, conditional in a way that harms the parent-child relationship, and often rooted in prejudice rather than concern for the child’s actual well-being. (Continued next post)

Elons Own AI said it (cont) ..especially once the child is old enough to form their own convictions. The earlier examples established that maintaining regard and love in those cases is loving; the converse is therefore open to the criticism (cont)

Elons Own AI said it (cont) ..Withdrawing regard, expressing disdain, or creating separation solely because a child is gay or has adopted a different religion fails the ordinary standard of parental love that most people (across many ethical and consider appropriate (cont)

Elons Own AI said it (cont) User: Would they deserve criticism for this disposition? In your opinion? Grok: Yes, in my view they would deserve criticism for that disposition. (Continued next post)

Elons own AI said it (cont) Love, in the sense used in the previous examples, involves continued positive attachment and regard that is not withdrawn or diminished on those grounds. The disposition you describe is the opposite of that. User: (cont. next post)

Elons own AI said it (cont) Grok: No. Expressing lower regard or love, along with disdain or separation, toward a child because the child is gay or has chosen a different religion is not loving behavior by ordinary standards. (Continued next post)

Elons own AI said it (cont) User: if a parent took the converse disposition and expressed a lower regard and/ or love, as well as disdain or separation, for either of these examples, would you still describe them as loving? Grok: No (continued)

Elons own AI said it (cont) ..The absence of reduced attachment or conditional withdrawal based on the child’s religious choice is a clear marker of love. (Continued)

Elons own AI said it (cont) Grok: Yes. A parent who continues to hold the same regard and love for an adult or near-adult child after that child adopts a different religion is, by ordinary standards, acting in a loving way. (Cont)

Elons own AI said it (cont) User: If someone’s child chose to worship a different religion than their parents, and their parents expressed the fact that they had no less regard or love for that child (hypothetically old enough to hold religious philosophies), as loving? (Cont.)

Elons own AI said it (cont) The actions and the explicit affirmation both track the child’s well-being and the parent’s continued attachment without condition on sexual orientation. That is loving. (Continued next post)

Elons own AI said it (cont) Grok: Yes. A parent who actively defends their gay child’s rights and states that their regard and love remain undiminished is behaving in a way that meets ordinary, ordinary-language criteria for being loving. (Continued next post)

Elons own AI Said it: User: Would you describe a parent who defends the rights of their gay child and expresses the fact that they have no less regard or love for them due to their being gay, as loving? Grok: Yes (continued next post)

Fuck this platform, fuck elon musk, this pestilent child has programmed filters, blocks, and algorithms to prohibit any accounts did he personally wouldn’t like so he can go fuck himself and fuck this fucking platform. Drop dead motherfucker.