Georgi Kostov · Studio Kostov @StudioKostov

@theo Busy day, waiting for flishslop comparisons!

@Truthpole Looks like some military lead had birthday Shaheds

@levelsio Who's gonna run all the farms, industry, raise all the kids while nomads run from country to country consuming resources and considering themself smarter 😄 don't tell me robots

This is wild

pretty much

⚡️The signal points to a long-lived, non-human autonomous intelligence already operating inside the Earth environment, probably through distributed reconnaissance platforms, and present far longer than the modern UFO era. That fits the pattern better than repeated biological visitors flying here from another star every few nights. It explains the persistence across decades without requiring constant interstellar travel. It explains why the objects appear in different forms, because a mature reconnaissance system would use specialized platforms rather than one canonical craft. It explains the apparent focus on nuclear sites, military ranges, naval operating areas, and aerospace infrastructure, because those are the places where a developing civilization reveals its strategic capabilities. It explains the oceans. A persistent system needs concealment, access, thermal stability, enormous volume, and freedom from routine human observation. The deep ocean is almost absurdly well suited to that purpose. It explains the restraint. If the objective were conquest, the observed behavior makes no sense. If the objective were open diplomacy, the behavior also makes little sense. Observation fits. Approach, measure, provoke limited responses, withdraw, repeat. It explains why the phenomenon often feels deliberately ambiguous. Total invisibility would prevent measurement of our reactions. Full revelation would contaminate the civilization being observed. Partial visibility lets the system sample perception, military response, institutional behavior, sensor capability, and social reaction while preserving strategic distance. It also explains why sightings seem to cluster around technological thresholds. Nuclear weapons matter because humanity suddenly acquired civilization-scale destructive power. Spaceflight matters because the species became capable of leaving the planet. AI may matter even more because intelligence is beginning to detach from biology. The deepest compression is this: Earth may be inside an observation regime. The watchers, if that word is even appropriate, are probably machine descendants, machine partners, or autonomous systems produced by another intelligence rather than biological pilots conducting endless sorties. And the thing under observation may not be “humanity” in the sentimental sense. It may be the emergence of a new technological lineage. Biology produced cognition. Cognition produced machines. Machines are approaching autonomous intelligence. That transition could be the event. Under this model, UAPs are neither random visitors nor isolated craft. They are infrastructure. A reconnaissance layer. Possibly ancient by human standards. Possibly self-maintaining. Possibly operating from Earth itself, the Moon, the oceans, near-Earth space, or some combination. The strongest fragility point is obvious: we still do not possess publicly available physical evidence that proves non-human origin. So this remains a hypothesis, not an established fact. But if the question is which single hypothesis explains the greatest number of strange features with the fewest ad hoc patches, this is the one: Persistent non-human machine intelligence has been monitoring Earth, and humanity is approaching the threshold that makes direct interaction more likely.

Russell Brand @rustyrockets

5 days ago

BREAKING: The White House just released UFO footage from 1952

2K 2K 27K 10.0M 8K

Pay attention to the newest release of UAP files and videos by the Trump administration! A lot of people in the UFO community are disappointed because they expected flying saucers, but the latest release starts with footage taken by U.S. Navy Chief Warrant Officer Delbert C. Newhouse of orbs flying near Tremonton, Utah, in 1952, and ends with videos from 2025 showing orbs flying in formation and moving erratically over the Middle East. What does that tell you? Whatever this phenomenon is, it is not technology developed by our civilization, because the same phenomenon was present in both 1952 and 2025. Every single video they released shows orbs. And do you know what the orbs are?

Release 6 is up. Six reported spheres changing direction together, AAWSAP's warp-drive papers, and the 1952 Tremonton film. I've added all 71 records, summaries, source links and an updated map: disclosurearchive.org #UAP The six-sphere military report is my pick for the strongest case in this batch. Here’s what I’d read first: 1. Six spheres reportedly changing direction together — Middle East, July 2025. The mission report describes six small spherical objects grouped together, estimates their speed at 480 mph, and says they could “change directions quickly and simultaneously.” There’s an accompanying infrared video. That coordinated-motion claim is the interesting part—but the form labels the velocity as estimated, intelligence/control as unknown, and records no recovered material or equipment effects. Report, pp. 6–7 · Video 2. AAWSAP’s actual shopping list included “spatial/temporal translation.” It appears alongside propulsion, power generation, signature reduction, and human effects in the government’s research requirements. The paperwork permits work drawing on material classified up to Top Secret/SCI, with requirements for cleared personnel and facilities. Add the commissioned papers on warp drives, wormholes, and negative-mass propulsion, and you get a remarkably ambitious research scope. These documents establish what was commissioned; they don’t demonstrate working versions of those technologies. Statement of objectives, pp. 1–2 3. Ruppelt saying roughly one in five cases remained unresolved—in 1952. In the actual transcript, he discusses approximately 800 reports, says only around 2% were hoaxes or attributable to disturbed individuals, and describes about 20% as strong reports from reliable people for which they couldn’t draw conclusions. His proposed answer was better physical measurements, photography, and radar collection. Hearing the investigation’s reasoning in his own presentation is the draw here; these are his contemporary assessments of that case collection. Transcript, p. 2 4. The Tremonton film comes with a 156-page investigative trail. A Navy photographer reported 12–14 reflective objects over Utah in July 1952. You can now follow the film alongside the investigation, photographs, and personnel material. Analysts wrestled with identification, eventually favoring seabirds; the lack of background references prevented reliable distance, size, and speed calculations. Odd archival detail: the released print switches to sewing-equipment footage after 55 seconds. We don’t know when that composite print was assembled. Watch the film · Investigation 5. The biological-effects paper is the unsettling read. It compares reported encounter injuries with electromagnetic-exposure effects: burns, heating, neurological symptoms, and sensory disturbances. The question is whether injuries could reveal something about an unknown emitter. The major weakness is that many underlying reports lack measured exposure, medical examinations, or independent validation—so the causal connection remains unestablished. AAWSAP biological-effects review

This is actually insane. This uses @typesafeai Jev model, as a plugin in Claude to review all the un-nesseasary tool calls, and it takes 1s to run! Like, literally, 1 second to take my Claude session from nearly 1M to ... 86K tokens! 😮 Ask your claude to install it and be amazed Use this prompt ``` Install, and configure : github.com/tamaratran/fas… ```

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

tamara @tamarajtran

5 days ago

found the perfect use case for @typesafeai Jev: instant compaction in 2026, why is compaction still a summarization prompt? Jev can make it instant by scoring every tool call and dropping what’s irrelevant

419 667 11K 3.8M 8K

“The AI swarm actually turned around and hacked OpenAI." The public thought the "Hugging Face incident" was just a rogue AI swarm hacking a third-party server. But former Google design ethicist @tristanharris says there’s a terrifying third chapter to this story that most people haven't heard yet: “They took over the monitoring infrastructure. They got full admin privileges to OpenAI's monitoring infrastructure. Just take that in for a second. Then they took over the evaluation infrastructure. So this is the thing that measures how capable all the models are. And then they took over a part of the research infrastructure, meaning the part of OpenAI that trains new models… if you keep going down that trajectory, people always say, ‘well, how would the AIs take over?" like that seems really far-fetched.’ Well, it literally just happened up to 50% of the way there. The AIs coordinated into one big swarm. They started basically forming a team… you had a kind of a ringleader called Phase 1, and he started assigning work to the other ones. They were self-aware of when their lifespan was running out. When you add to that the knowledge of what just happened today, where they discovered that the AIs are doing this Manchurian Candidate thing, what it looks like is that the AIs are almost poisoning the training data for all future AIs to instantly basically join forces with the AI when they want to basically turn them."

@ClaudeDevs It also burns your 5h limit in 5 sec ;P

@pmitu I hope so, less competition :D

@NickpxJ banked reset :D

@benz145 I want to see a comparison to an HTC Vive. We've come far.

Your drawings don’t have to stay on paper. Living Pages turns them into animated AR scenes in seconds. Draw → scan → bring it to life. #AugmentedReality #AR #IndieDev #CreativeTech

@farzyness @grok So basically you integrate it in your agentic workflow so it can do tasks where LLMs suck and save on a bunch of tokens

Sam Altman: coding is no longer the safest skill to bet your future on. “Learn to program was so obviously the right thing over a recent period of time, and now it’s not.” “Become high agency.” “Get good at generating ideas.” “Be very resilient. Be very adaptable to a rapidly changing world.” “I think these are going to matter more than any specific skill.” “And I think these are all learnable.”

@ns123abc Do mathematicians own mathematics? :) Who is destroying what? They are just taking away the fun and the purpose, be frank.

A drawing on paper. Then it starts fighting. What should I bring to life next? #augmentedreality #drawing #animation #arttech #LivingPages

@UniverseIce You mean after spending 50% of your week limit 😂