ThisOtherGuyTox @ToxThis

Moderator on Out of Cards. Proud dane and card creation fanatic. Joined January 2019

Tweets

21
Followers

2
Following

42
Likes

9

ThisOtherGuyTox @ToxThis

7 years ago

@R_R_Rye @SenSanders You don't seem to understand how debt works. Looking at the Net international investment position for Denmark, you would see that other countries actually owe more to Denmark, than they have in debt. And this number is rising each year.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

ThisOtherGuyTox @ToxThis

7 years ago

@hardunkichud_d @SenSanders Tax Rate for a 22 Dollar an hour paying job is not 55.8%. The 55,8% tax-rate is applied on each Dollar above 77.170 dollars earned a year. Depending on the amount you work, you may actually have to pay down towards 8,5% until you've earned about 6.000 dollars.

0 0 3 0 0

View Details

ThisOtherGuyTox @ToxThis

7 years ago

@Lennartson_K @SenSanders Could you clarify where this data comes from? According to data from Dansk Statistik, there has actually been more Americans moving to Denmark than the other way around for the past several years. This could obviously be wrong, but i see nothing that suggests the opposite.

0 0 2 0 0

View Details

ThisOtherGuyTox @ToxThis

7 years ago

@PlayHearthstone It would be great if the playful sprites would actually let me enter the game.

0 0 3 0 0

View Details

ThisOtherGuyTox @ToxThis

7 years ago

@bmkibler The real question is what voting 'Results' will result in.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

ThisOtherGuyTox @ToxThis

7 years ago

@DeyanBB @Alliestrasza We didn't know back when i wrote this. It seemt like a general trend, since each of the other "hero classes" had recieved one of the four non-corrupted dragon aspects.

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

ThisOtherGuyTox @ToxThis

7 years ago

@DisguisedToast Just get good genetics

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

ThisOtherGuyTox @ToxThis

7 years ago

@G2Rdu @spect8com Why would i enter a competition to fight you, when you're like every third person i face on legend ladder? <3

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

ThisOtherGuyTox @ToxThis

7 years ago

@StormFeverHS It would be like if they reintroduced a new keyword named Overkill, and it triggers when the minion itself takes excess damage. It would be the same name, but a completely different effect.

1 0 0 0 0

View Details

ThisOtherGuyTox @ToxThis

7 years ago

@StormFeverHS I explained it to you before, but I can do it again. This card tells an effect, which is untrue to what it actually does. The player has an expectation of what will happen, based on previous cards. With Zephrys, you have nothing to relate it to, so the player can't relate to it.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

ThisOtherGuyTox @ToxThis

7 years ago

@StormFeverHS When you see the same wording, you expect the same result to occur. Noone is misunderstanding what the new Hunter cards does, just because they don't use Inspire however. On the other hand, practically everyone expects this to work like Glimmeroot.

1 0 1 0 0

View Details

ThisOtherGuyTox @ToxThis

7 years ago

@StormFeverHS Double negative. It reuses the wording of Unstable Evolution, which existed before Echo. Second on all, that would be creating a new way to describe the same effect. This on the other hand is using the exact same wording to describe a different effect.

1 0 1 0 0

View Details

ThisOtherGuyTox @ToxThis

7 years ago

@StormFeverHS Glimmeroot exists. And like it or not, thats what its compared to. It would be different if it didnt exist, but it does. There is nothing to suggest that wordings in wild doesnt matter.

1 0 1 0 0

View Details

ThisOtherGuyTox @ToxThis

7 years ago

@StormFeverHS But with a dream card there is nothing to relate it to. It pretty much asks the person to try and figure it. Imagine that they release a new Dream card generator, but the average quality of the dream cards are suddenly that of Spare Parts. And the majority of people doesnt know.

1 0 0 0 0

View Details

ThisOtherGuyTox @ToxThis

7 years ago

@StormFeverHS @CrochetMezi In a game, where the dust for an epic can be several days of playing Hearthstone, it needs to be realistic to understand a card, that utilizes previous wordings. If you're not able to do that, without making the text too long, then the card probably shouldn't exist.

1 0 1 0 0

View Details

ThisOtherGuyTox @ToxThis

7 years ago

@StormFeverHS @CrochetMezi I don't think you get the issue. The card straight up does something else than the text conveys. People will craft this day 1 and think it works like Glimmeroot, which would make it a strong card. But the card is significantly weaker than what the text describes.

1 1 1 0 0

View Details

ThisOtherGuyTox @ToxThis

7 years ago

@StormFeverHS @CrochetMezi But Glimmeroot is the only comparison. The biggest problem is not that it uses the Glimmeroot wording, but that it doesnt tell how the card actually picks.

1 0 0 0 0

View Details

ThisOtherGuyTox @ToxThis

7 years ago

@puffinplays @StormFeverHS That seems very counterintuative. The wording mirrors that of Glimmeroot, while the pool of cards it can pick from are a completely different sort. The card doesnt give any indication that it looks at cards that started in the deck! Furtheremore. It kills the skill of Glimmeroot.