Christos Iliopoulos @chrisilion

This is f*king insane. SpaceXAI engineer Nick Miller, ex-Cursor: "99% of people open one Grok Bot and call it automation I run 20+ bots with a Chief of Staff, a PM, QA, and 15+ workers" In this 30-minute demo, he shows how to turn a single bot into a coordinated team Grok Bot → Chief of Staff → PM → QA → Workers Adding bots doesn't create a team. Clear handoffs and verification do Worth more than most $1,000 agent engineering courses Bookmark and watch it today Then read the full article below ↓

tsukiema @tsukiema_

3 days ago

Andrej Karpathy’s LLM Wiki + Grok Bot A Second Brain that turns your knowledge into finished work Put your notes on a night shift before another week slips away The complete setup and prompts below ↓ x.com/i/article/2112…

11 7 66 129K 171

Elon has done it. Grok Bot is officially the best AI agent on the planet. Half of these Bots would have taken a full engineering team months ago. 🧵: 10 insane Grok Bot use cases (tag your @bot to install these).👇

holy f*ck, elon musk's team at spacexai just released 146 grok bots - all of them completely free they manage your inbox, chase down invoices, call customers, and one controls your vacuum right from chat. every bot installs in one click. 56 job-ready bots on the use cases page 90 bots available in the marketplace bots like these typically cost $50-200 each. here you pay nothing. how to get started: 1. head to the use cases page or the marketplace 2. pick a bot based on the job you need done 3. tap add - it appears in your grok bot instantly 4. send it your first task in chat use cases: x.ai/bot/use-cases marketplace: x.ai/bot/marketplace

Iron Giant @irongiantXBT

2 weeks ago

x.com/i/article/2109…

46 57 415 643K 2K

This is f*cking insane. SpaceXAI engineer (ex-Cursor): "A year ago I was one more engineer at Cursor, writing code 12 hours a day Now 20+ GrokBot agents do that work, and SpaceXAI pays me $650K a year to run them" This 1-hour workshop shows exactly how to build that GrokBot team from scratch Chat → Copilot → GrokBot → Bot Teams → Self-Improving Systems The engineers who run agent teams are the ones getting the $500K+ offers This workshop is worth more than most $2,000 AI career bootcamps Skip Netflix today and watch this Then read the harness engineering guide below and build your first agent team ↓

rari🈀 @0xwhrrari

2 months ago

x.com/i/article/2093…

77 326 2K 5.6M 7K

HOLY SH*T, ELON MUSK PUT SPACEXAI'S BEST ENGINEERS ON A LIVE STREAM TO SHOW EXACTLY HOW TO BUILD A COMPANY WITH GROK BOTS they start from an empty github org and zero bots. 72 hours, live. how to use grok bot, from their demo: step 1: make one bot per job, not one chat per task step 2: tell it the result you want, voice works too step 3: set approval rules, e.g. ask me before sending any email step 4: show it a task once on screen, it saves it as a skill step 5: add a routine, e.g. every morning at 9 it sends you a summary step 6: if it refuses or asks questions, teach it, it keeps that in memory the parts worth watching: 11:29 - the first hires: which bots they pick 20:23 - building a bot from scratch with one voice prompt 22:54 - teaching a bot a task by doing it once 25:21 - setting up a 9 am routine save this and study the article below, it has ready-made grok bot configs you can copy ↓

unicode @unicodef1wn

4 days ago

I put together one guide for anyone who wants a workflow like the SpaceXSI team's. One message builds your whole Grok Bot setup. Plus the team's rules, prompt habits, routines and permissions. Every setup is a block you paste. 16-min read. Save it ↓ x.com/i/article/2112…

55 60 495 871K 1K

subjects to learn to expand your mind: 1 - metacognition 2 - bilingual cognitive processing 3 - pattern recognition 4 - neuroplasticity 5 - game theory 6 - subconscious reprogramming 7 - quantum mechanics 8 - mathematics 9 - psychology 10 - architectural semiotics 11 - closed loop resource systems 12 - ontological design 13 - delusional optimism

This is f*king insane. SpaceXAI engineer Nick Miller, ex-Cursor: "99% of people open one Grok Bot and call it automation I run 20+ bots with a Chief of Staff, a PM, QA, and 15+ workers" In this 30-minute demo, he shows how to turn a single bot into a coordinated team Grok Bot → Chief of Staff → PM → QA → Workers Adding bots doesn't create a team. Clear handoffs and verification do Worth more than most $1,000 agent engineering courses Bookmark and watch it today Then read the full article below ↓

rari🈀 @0xwhrrari

2 months ago

x.com/i/article/2093…

77 326 2K 5.6M 7K

🚨: Red light therapy for 12 minutes, 2x weekly, reversed all signs of aging and disease in a clinical study using a 620 nm red light.

3 supplements shown to increase libido: - Maca, tongkat ali (longjack) and tribulus all have peer-reviewed research behind them - Maca: 2-3 grams per day, sold as a powder or capsule - Take it early in the day - it acts as a stimulant and can interfere with sleep - Studies ran 8-12 weeks, in men and women, athletes and non-athletes - Maca raised subjective sexual desire independent of hormones - no change in testosterone or estrogen - None of these are required, and check with your physician first @hubermanlab

SUPPLEMENT CHEAT SHEET MAGNESIUM = 10/10 VITAMIN D3/K2 = 9/10 CREATINE = 9/10 COLLAGEN = 9/10 CoQ10 = 9/10 GLYCINE = 9/10 INOSITOL = 8/10 TAURINE = 8/10 ASTAXANTHIN = 8/10 LUTEIN/ZEAXANTHIN = 8/10 OMEGA-3s = 7/10 BETA-ALANINE = 7/10

The longer you’ve known someone, the more likely you’ve hurt them without realizing it. With family, partners, and close colleagues, you need to elevate your empathy. You don’t have to abandon it, just recognize that the longer you’ve been around, the higher their expectations of you.

How intermittent fasting. dietary restriction (DR) and chemical mimetics might protect against neurodegeneration 🧠 Involvement of NAD/SIRT1, mTOR, and AMPK - favorites of longevity research 🧵

"Try to be predictable to your friends and unpredictable to your enemies, rather than the opposite." - @nntaleb

A Giant Korean Study of 15 Million People Just Blew a Hole in the “Lower LDL Is Always Better” Story Imagine tracking almost 15 million adults for nearly nine years and counting every death from heart disease and stroke. That’s exactly what Korean researchers did with 14.9 million people who weren’t even taking cholesterol drugs. What they found doesn’t match the simple message that “the lower your LDL, the safer you are.” Instead, the risk formed a U-shape. People with very low LDL died more often from cardiovascular causes, people with very high LDL also died more often, and the sweet spot sat right in the middle. For overall cardiovascular death the lowest risk landed between about 90 and 149 mg/dL. Below that range or well above it, deaths went up. The pattern changed depending on the exact problem. For heart attacks and blocked arteries the best zone was lower (around 70–114 mg/dL). For some types of brain bleeds the risk kept falling only when LDL stayed higher. In plain terms, driving LDL as low as possible protected against one kind of death while raising the risk of others. When the scientists looked only at the higher range (100 to 300 mg/dL) they still saw a clear rise in heart-attack deaths as LDL climbed. Each jump of about 40 mg/dL raised the chance of dying from ischemic heart disease by roughly 26 percent. But that rise was weaker in women and in older adults than in younger men. Even people in their late 70s and early 80s still showed some extra risk from higher LDL for heart attacks and ischemic strokes, yet the overall picture never became “lower is always safer.” The study is huge, it followed real people instead of just guessing from lab tests, and it only looked at folks who were not already on statins. That makes the U-shape harder to wave away. Doctors still treat high LDL when people already have heart disease or several risk factors, because the top end of the curve is real. But the data also show that pushing every healthy adult toward rock-bottom LDL numbers is not free. Too low carried its own price in this massive population. The takeaway is simple and uncomfortable: LDL cholesterol is not a one-way street. In nearly 15 million Koreans the safest zone for dying of cardiovascular disease was not the lowest number on the lab report. Both extremes cost lives. That single finding from one of the largest studies ever done keeps forcing the same awkward question—how low is actually low enough, and for whom?

@NightSkyToday Entropy

If you weren’t capable of it, the desire wouldn’t exist in you to begin with. ​Take neuroplasticity seriously. Your brain cannot tell the difference between vivid rehearsal and reality. What you obsess over mentally, you wire physically. Act like the person you are becoming until your nervous system catches up.

2 weeks of glycine + NAC restored signs of aging back to youthful levels. Older adults (60-75) vs younger adults (30-40). The older group had: ◈ ~46% lower glutathione ◈ ~68% slower glutathione production ◈ ~55% less glycine and ~24% less cysteine, the building blocks ◈ Significantly higher oxidative damage markers After 14 days on a megadose of glycine+NAC (100 mg/kg glycine + 133 mg/kg NAC), the older folks saw: ◈ Glutathione nearly doubled (+95%) ◈ Glutathione production more than tripled (+231%) ◈ Oxidative stress + damage markers dropped to the same levels as the young group ◈ Trend towards reduced blood sugar (improved insulin resistance) They were indistinguishable from people 30 years younger on every one of these measures. Oxidative stress and insulin resistance are core drivers of all aging processes. This simple combo can combat it.

Dalton (Analyze & Optimize) @Outdoctrination

a year ago

One of the most impressive studies in recent memory showed that 2 cheap, over the counter supplements reversed nearly every sign of aging measured. (🧵1/8)

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

88 634 5K 1.6M 9K

@hubermanlab Thats f@cking good

"𝘼𝙢𝙗𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙖𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣, 𝙗𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙭𝙞𝙚𝙩𝙮. 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙖𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙖𝙢𝙗𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣, 𝙗𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙨𝙡𝙖𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮." - 𝙈𝙖𝙧𝙘𝙪𝙨 𝘼𝙪𝙧𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙪𝙨

Imagine following nearly 13 million real people for more than 10 years just to see what cholesterol level helps them live the longest. That is exactly what Korean scientists did in a giant 2019 study. They tracked 12.8 million adults who had check-ups between 2001 and 2004, and they kept watching until 2013. More than 694,000 people died during that long stretch. The results were clear and surprising. Cholesterol and death formed a U-shape. Very low cholesterol was linked to higher death rates. So was very high cholesterol. The sweet spot for the longest life was 210 to 249 mg/dL for most adults. That is higher than many doctors call “ideal.” Younger people had a slightly lower best range, but still not the super-low numbers often pushed today. Because the study lasted so many years, reverse causality is less likely to explain the low-cholesterol danger. Reverse causality means a hidden illness might lower your cholesterol right before it kills you. With more than a decade of follow-up, early sickness cannot easily account for the extra deaths seen in people who started with low cholesterol. The pattern held across ages and for both men and women. The huge number of people—almost the entire adult population of a country—makes the findings hard to ignore. Smaller studies can be wrong by chance. This one is massive. It shows that moderately higher total cholesterol, not the lowest possible number, went with the best chance of living longer in this large group. In short, the biggest study of its kind found that cholesterol levels in the low-to-mid 200s were tied to the longest lives, and the long tracking time makes it tougher to blame the higher death rates at low levels on reverse causality alone.